Capital Punishment is awful and inhumane. The Death Penalty is not only unconstitutional, but it is taking away a human life. It is not right to punish criminals by doing to them exactly what they did to their victim. “The penalty for rape cannot be rape. Those who steal are not punished by being stolen from.
Capital Punishment Murder is the unlawful killing of one human by another, especially with premeditated malice. This country believes killings someone under certain circumstances is acceptable; this should not be the case. Capital punishment, the death penalty, is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill another human being. It is one of the most controversial topics in America today. Capital punishment is still murder, simple as that.
Mandery, Evan. Capital Punishment in America: A Balanced Examination. New York: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2011. Neumayer, Eric. “Death Penalty Abolition and the Ratiﬁcation of the Second Optional Protocol.” The International Journal of Human Rights 12.1 (2008): 3–21.
There is also a lack of evidence on the deterrent effect that retribution and the death penalty has on would-be murderers. The criminal justice system is not perfect and is bound to make mistakes. Innocent beings have been placed on death row later being exonerated, some even after execution. States should abolish capital punishment and replace it with a life sentence without the possibility for parole and include restitution. Expense States should turn to alternative forms of maximum punishment because of how costly it is to carry out the Death Penalty.
The death penalty is not the most effective form of punishment for criminals. The death penalty is hypocritical; it condemns killing by killing people. Many supporters of capital punishment cite retribution as being a justification for the death penalty; however, no matter what the circumstance, murder is never justified. Ghandi once said “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” Two wrongs can never make a right. Capital punishment should be abolished because while even though many supporters of the death penalty claim that it prevents crime, there is no evidence that it has been proven to do so.
However, a growing number of the public is wondering whether it is a worthwhile way to teach a lesson. Although capital punishment is a widely used method of reprimanding national offenders, many individuals question whether it is an effective way to deter future criminals. (http://karisable.com/crpundeath.htm) Introduction to Capital Punishment Capital punishment, also known as a death penalty, is often characterized as the execution of a person who is convicted of committing a crime or a serious offense by the court of law. Historically, capital punishment was primarily introduced in the early 18th Century in Hammurabi’s Code of Laws in Babylon. This Code gave strict disciplinary measures for punishing people.
True Justice Through Application of the Death Penalty The death penalty, as administered by states based on their individual laws, is considered capital punishment, the purpose of which is to penalize criminals convicted of murder or other heinous crimes (Fabian). The death penalty issue has been the focus of much controversy in recent years, even though capital punishment has been a part of our country's history since the beginning. Crimes in colonial times, such as murder and theft of livestock were dealt with swiftly and decisively ("The Death Penalty..."). Criminals were hanged shortly after their trial, in public executions. This practice was then considered just punishment for those crimes.
Who has the right to take away someone’s life? No one really, but the bitter truth is that the government does. The way they see it is an eye for an eye. Protecting the rest of the world from what is considered to be a monstrous human being filled with only hatred and violence, with no chance of changing or improving their horrific behaviors. The death penalty is racially and economically biased, rarely reversed for the wrongly accused, and the government should not have that power.
5. Therefore, because killing is wrong, killing by capital punishment is also wrong under every circumstance. My first premise states that killing is wrong because it deprives the victim of his or her future. Just as Marquis argues that abortion is wrong because it is killing an individual and depriving him or her of a valuable future, I argue that capital punishment is wrong because it too involves killing and depriving an individual of a valuable future. Marquis states, “When I am killed, I am deprived both of what I now value which would have been part of my future personal life, but also what I would come to value” (322).
What kind of crime could a person commit that there punishment is nonetheless the death sentence? Some of the crimes like rape, murder, pretty much any criminal acts should be considered before taking the individuals life. Capital punishment is considered morally wrong, because it is taking an individual’s life in a very cruel and unusual manor. Some people disagree with this because of the saying “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth” but, in the legal sense of it all it is wrong to give the criminal an easy way out (Williams 22). Do you not believe that if we kill the criminal who committed the crimes, we are not letting them reach the consequence that most criminals fear a life sentence in prison?