Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
reducing human impact on climate change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: reducing human impact on climate change
As cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead once said “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; Indeed it’s the only thing that ever has.” In an excerpt from an essay published in the New York Times Magazine, American public intellectual Michael Pollan reveals his goal to convince the ordinary of citizens America that they are capable of saving the world from climate change and to answer the unappeasable question of “Why bother?”. This inquiry stems from the belief that one person is not capable of making a difference in relation to the larger spectrum of Americans who continue to emit a large amount of C02, increasing the effects of climate change, and destroying the environment. Through the exploration of behavior change, and other personal alternatives aimed to reduce America 's carbon footprint, Pollan aspires to have …show more content…
Pollan recalls that the “really dark moment [of the lecture] came during the closing credits , we [they] were asked to...change [their] light bulbs.” He remarks that this minute gesture seemed punitive in comparison to the “magnitude of the problem Gore had described” stating that it is “drop-in-the-bucket” issues like this that cause people to ask the question “why bother?” Kentucky farmer and writer Wendell Berry also influenced Pollan’s thoughts on climate change when he wrote an analysis describing global warming as a “crisis of character” meaning that the everyday acts of humans- such as using computers and other forms of technology- have “real-world consequences” that aid in the destruction of the environment. The analyses of these two environmental specialists are what taught Pollan the importance of beginning the fight against climate change at
Michael Crichton was an amazing novelist who penned numerous literary works that has impacted today’s societies. In his book, State of Fear, an eBook extra presents a speech given by him called, Why Speculate? Aspects of this speech show the reader that he disapproves of the ways that the media speculates and creates a public that is misinformed about the events of the world. Upon further elaboration, the reader can become aware that Michael Crichton is a critic of global warming, and believes it is nothing more than media speculation. The key idea of the book was the debate of global warming and bioterrorism. Global warming and the emission of greenhouse gases is a concept heavily found in the curriculum, as a student analyzes how different
Humans are damaging the planet to live comfortably, we must change the way food is distributed worldwide, support local farmers and switch to a healthier diet in order to stop global warming. The current global has been getting better for us humans over the years, from eating bread and eggs 3 times a day in the XV century, now we can eat better than the kings of those times, however the much of the food in not healthy and the global food system still fails in getting food to every individual in the planet and in addition it contributes to the destruction of our world. Ms. Anna Lappe explains how the food system contributes to around 1/3 of the global warming issue in her essay “The Climate Crisis at the End of Our Fork”, while a group of Plos one explains the issues about the export and import of food growth over the last 50 years in the
According to the World Bank’s report, climatologists predict greenhouse gases will cause temperatures to rise 7.2 degrees before the next century (par. 8). While the rise in temperature might seem trivial, Scranton elaborates on the detrimental effects this change would cause by quoting James Clapper. Mr. Clapper, the director of national intelligence, argues that extreme weather disasters will “increasingly disrupt food and energy markets, exacerbating state weakness, forcing human migrations, and triggering riots, civil disobedience, and vandalism” (par. 7). Dr. Scranton mentions these sources in order to convince the audience that an increase of only a few degrees can have a devastating impact that will inevitably leave the planet radically different during this epoch; the current epoch we live in, named the Anthropocene, is a term invented by geologist and scientists for the epoch that is “characterized by the arrival of the human species as a geological force” (par. 10). The name of the epoch inspired Scranton to title the article “Learning How to Die in the Anthropocene” since it reaffirms his claim that we must accept that the future will not be the same as the present. Furthermore, Scranton includes a book in his article written by geophysicist David Archer incase readers remain skeptical of the scientific evidence with
Michael Pollan, on his essay “Why Bother” published in the New York Times in 2008 recounts his concern on the lately increased of global warming. He begins contrasting Gore’s writing about changing a light bulb as a perfect way to make a change in the environment. This upset him, because he thinks that such things are not enough that
In the article “Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math”, written by Bill Mckibben, he firstly opens up by saying that back in 2012, according to the statistics, we surpassed the global record high for climate temperature in our nation, destroying other previous records. Despite the research and the displaying of data, nobody is doing anything to adress the following issue. Mckibben outlines three distinctive numbers that outline the following issue., 2 degrees celsius, 565 gigations, and 2795 gigtons, which he uses to validitate and support his argument. Firstly, the ongoing problem of climate change in society is fundamentally a matter of individual moral responsibility that is inspired by the insight individuals are intentionally harming the environment. Secondly there is yet to be an effective collective state response to the issue of global warming, despite approaching two full decades of ongoing and reoccuring negotiations and the very near universal participation by states in the UNFCCC. Thirdly, because this issue has been put on hold for longer than it was innitially expected, greenhouse gases are being emitted into our atmosphere, polluting our environment. The South-North issue and an ongoing debate comes into effect as all the greenhouse gases that are created and used in the Northern hemisphere are being emmited into the southern hemisphere. Hence, my thesis is; despite the fact that global warming and climate change has been an ongoing problem globally for years, humanity has failed to resolve thiis issue as it quickly begins to escalate.
One of the biggest problems facing the world today is global warming. The main reason behind it is the production of carbon dioxide from our cars, factories, power plants and other greenhouse gases, which is having a heating effect on the atmosphere, and this affects our ocean weather and agriculture, thereby dangerous to human life. “In Climate Crisis at the End of Our Fork “Anna Lappe gives her views on how global warming can lead to many problems, what are its probable causes and potential solutions to it. Whereas in “Research and Development on Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases in Support of Climate Smart Livestock Production and a Vibrant Industry” Scholtz discusses the impact of global warming and continued, uncontrolled release of greenhouse gases on the livestock industry and consequently food security as well as
In Michael Pollan’s “Why Bother?” Pollan argues that each person can contribute to helping to the environment by erasing their carbon footprints. In my everyday life I experience the choice of driving my car to work or riding my bike. More often than not I choose to drive my car because it is the easier option. I, along with many other people, believe that my individual impact will not cause a larger impact on the global scale. In Pollan’s essay, he makes each person think about the effect they are leaving on the environment and how each person, as an individual, can change his ways before it is too late. Wendell Berry, a naturalist and well-respected and influential writer, was a key factor in recognition of the environmental crisis and how to solve the problem.
Mr. McKibben provides a strong argument call of action for everyone to take action against global warming. But he doesn 't just want action, Mr. Mckibben is demanding action now, and lots of it. Throughout the passage, Meltdown: Running Our of Time on Global Warming, the reader can examine the many ways that McKibben attempts to persuade others to join his movement. When one examines Bill McKibben 's use of rhetoric appeals, persuasive fallacies, and counter augments, A reader can analyze and understand the real claim that the writer is attempting to address.
The first part of this essay discusses what the human species has done to deal with the problem of climate change. While some improvements have been made, the problem has not been addressed aggressively enough to stop the damage. What is amazing about this is the denial of so many people that problems exist. If they do realize the risks, they are simply not taking actions to contain the damage.
To stop the rather scary problem of global climate change dramatic orders would need to be put in place. “We’re talking about the wholesale decarbonization of our country, about removing the fossil fuel base on which our prosperity has so far rested,” and that all seems a bit too complicated (McKibben 501). So instead, it seems a change in attitude is needed. In many cultures, including America’s, it is money over everything and it has always been like that. “If something made the economy…larger, we generally assented,” and that is the problem. Obviously, the reckless attitudes of humans are becoming more and more apparent as our planet plummets deeper into peril. However, maybe just by changing the overall attitude of the population, the results will change too. And in the long run, putting the environment first now will allow the economy to push to the front again.
It was difficult for me, at first, to understand the momentum of Climate Justice. When I started high school, it became clear to me how significant the issue was. I’m from a small island in Indonesia, called Bali, where garbage is carelessly tossed over the shoulders of locals. I never noticed it because it was the environment I lived in, it never seemed odd or out of place. When I moved to America for the first time, I noticed a drastic difference. I moved to a small town in Northern California, where priuses and reusable cloth bags were counted on fingers and toes. Shortly after, I moved back to Bali, and it was a monumental shock. I had never took notice of the impact it had on the earth. In Bali I constantly observed my setting, from wading
In recent years, the issue of climate change has increasingly become a serious global concern. The Earth is experiencing a rapid increase in global temperatures, as well as deforestation, desertification, melting of the polar ice caps, and sea level rise, with 9 of the 10 warmest years on record occurring since 2000 (NASA, 2017). The scope of this global problem is not limited to just the scientific mechanisms behind the change but also has social, political, and economic implications. The rapid increase in global carbon emissions and resulting warming trends are likely due to anthropogenic activities (IPCC, 2007), indicating that attempts to remedy this environmental crisis must aim at changing human behavior, addressing the psychology behind our behavioral interactions with the environment. Environmental psychologists seek to understand what causes people to participate in environmentally friendly behaviors, for the purpose of developing methods to influence human behavior in a pro-environmental fashion using social norms and their
Director David Guggenheim's, 'An Inconvenient Truth' is a documentary about former American politician Al Gore informing citizens on the causes and effects of Global Warming. He explains that the natural cycle of the Earths climate has been disturbed by noxious gas building up around the atmosphere and will continue to raise if we don't act soon. Gore's way of explaining Global Warming is both enlightening and surreal, as he refers to statistics, sentiment of nature, and the question of our perception and freedom to get his point across to his audience. By using such techniques to show his extensive knowledge on the subject, he can really appeal to the community.
The growing global awareness of climate change has encouraged governments and corporations to take steps in preventing climate change, such as passing clean energy legislation (Obama’s plan in the U.S.), limiting deforestation (Brazil), reducing carbon emissions (E.U.), and working together as a planet to pass international laws and help counties that are still developing (like China and India) reduce their negative impact (National Public Radio [NPR], 2011). It is true that this future may take longer to show signs of momentum, however, progress in this movement is sure to be in a positive direction. Hopefully, this direction will include collaborative work to ensure that communities help in the fight against climate change, protection of plants, animals, and oceans, increased usage of alternative energy, and most importantly, encourage global mindfulness. Collaboration and a conscious choice to end climate change are all we need for a brighter, climate change free,
Subpoint A: Not long ago, a documentary film called “An Inconvenient truth” came out in 2006. This film raised international public awareness of climate change and reenergizing the environmental movement. A former U.S Vice president Al Gore campaigned to educate citizens about global warming through a simp...