The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Nighttime: A Film Analysis

1999 Words4 Pages

The most memorable part of a play that a person remembers when he or she leaves the theater are the people that came together as a group to make the production happen. The scenery, lighting, and special effects should not overpower the performance of the actors. It also should not determine whether or not a play is successful. Theatre productions such as You Tweet My Face Space, Home Chat, The Curious Incident of the dog in the Nighttime, Cats, and Peter Pan Goes Wrong are examples of plays that had wonderful playwrights and performers. Some of these productions used good supportive measures to make the play successful and some unfortunately used measures that overpowered the talent of the people in the show. It is very difficult to know where …show more content…

This production was originally a book and was made into a play by Simon Stephens. The actors he casted such as Joseph Ayre, who played the main character Christopher, were perfect for the production (About the Show). He was able to correctly portray the life of a child with autism and how the brain of an autistic child operates. The audience was really able to feel all of the emotions and struggles that he had to go through on an everyday basis. It is very difficult to act out the symptoms of a disorder that many people don’t understand. An additional actor that added to the play was Nicolas Tennant who played Ed Boone, Christopher’s father (About the Show). He was full of emotions of anger and displayed to the audience how much patience and calmness the parents of an autistic child need to make the relationship between them work. Where the production could have been better were in the category of the set and the lighting. It was overwhelming and took away from parts of the actors performance. The role of the lightning and video designers were taken by Paule Constable and Finn Ross (About the Show). The use of the set, props, lighting and sound in a production should all be supportive and add depth to each of the characters roles. The lighting and sound were obnoxious and distracted the audience from the acting that was going on. Although the set looked really interesting it was way too much. The play could have been just as successful with a less “flashy” set and simpler special

Open Document