Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how culture affects organizational performance pfeffer and veiga
determinants of organizational culture
determinants of organizational culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Cultural Intelligence Difference Cultural intelligence is quickly becoming the focus for companies looking to diversify into the global market. When focusing on a business strategy, maintaining the conceptual mindset of business as a mission (BAM) is crucial, not only for increasing the company’s success, but individual leaders within the business (Tunehag, 2008). One of the strategies to focus on while improving an approach of BAM is the concept of cultural intelligence. Furthermore, individuals capable of self-study and improvement will begin to see an increase for their company, as well as, God’s kingdom when their focus is in alignment with the teaching of the Holy Bible. Author David Livermore defines cultural intelligence is as the “capability to function effectively in a variety of cultural contexts” (Livermore, 2011, p. 3). In order for achieving dimensional …show more content…
69). The four sub-dimensions of CQ knowledge are business, interpersonal, socio-linguistics, and leadership. Dissecting the business sub-dimension acknowledges the understanding an individual has of the different cultural environments existing in different parts of the world regarding the economic, legal, and educational systems (Livermore, 2011, p. 75). The interpersonal sub-dimension assists with further insight into the differences in morals, societal protocol, and religious viewpoints of different cultures (Livermore, 2011, p. 75). Furthermore, obtaining the ability to decipher the different dialects while knowing the meaning of expressions of verbal and nonverbal cues (Livermore, 2011, p. 75), describes the socio-linguistics sub-dimension. Understanding how the role of managers and their job duties differ cross culturally explains the leadership sub-dimension (Livermore, 2011, p.
The Cultural Intelligence Difference was written by David Livermore, Ph.D. and published by AMACOM in 2011. After reading the book, I have found that the most important indicator of my ability to achieve success in today’s interconnected, globalized world is my cultural intelligence. Cultural intelligence can give me the ability to understand different perspectives and adjust my behaviors accordingly. According to Dr. Livermore, cultural intelligence can be defined as the ability to function effectively in a variety of cultural contexts, including: national, ethnic, organizational, and generational. By reading this book I can improve my understanding of cultural intelligence (Livermore, 2011). This paper will discuss my understanding of CQ drive, CQ knowledge, CQ strategy, CQ action, how I can improve my scores in these categories, my cultural prejudices, and my cultural ignorance’s.
The Analysis of the Intelligence of Individuals and Groups Much controversy surrounds the subject of intelligence. Intelligence tests were developed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century to assess the intelligence of individuals and groups. However, criticisms quickly arose regarding tests due to results being used to justify discrimination between different groups and cultures. Theorists argued that the tests assess verbal, mathematical, and spatial capabilities, but they do not directly examine other abilities that seem to be inherent parts of intelligence: creativity, social understanding, knowledge of one’s own strengths and weaknesses and so on. This perspective led Howard Gardner to formulate his theory of Multiple Intelligence.
Cultural competence does not assume that knowledge of a culture will provide all of the information
“Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is – His good, pleasing and perfect will.” (Roman 12.2, New International Version). This paper will show the similarities and differences between the Caux Round Table and White’s biblical principles. It will discuss how if any White’s principles more than Caux can impact organizations, employees, customers, and other stakeholders. Also, this investigation will discuss how suitable it can be to use scripture as a basis for ethical business decision making for global managers and what challenges or problems might exist for the Christian manager using White’s five
Intelligence can be defined in several ways. Intelligence is a combination of abilities for example recognizing reality, adjusting to evolving conditions, problem solving, and knowledge. One of the most important aspects of intelligence is an organism being able to familiarize oneself with the environment. The testing of intelligence is to analyze the way an individual thinks and the way he or she reasons, not to understand the how much information he or she as obtained. The problem that arises is the questions do not mean the same thing in every culture, so it becomes difficult to analyze the intelligence of more than one culture with the use of the same test. An ethnically direct meaning of intelligence is to comprehend the ideas behind the testing of intelligence and its effectiveness (Shiraev & Levy, 2010).
What daily demonstrations lend themselves to the development of stronger relationships with regards to being culturally competent?
Culture has a unique role in the case of intelligence and without describing the part of culture the intelligence portion will become incomplete. Besides, individuals in diverse societies have distinctive certain views on intelligence, therefore in one culture one behaviour may consider as smart or intelligent and in other it may consider as unintelligent or stupid. Then, the connections between diverse parts of intelligence can fluctuate crosswise over societies, with relationships that are optimistic in one setting ended up being pessimistic in an alternate. Then, first of all we should understand what is mean by Intelligence and what the definition of a culture is.
Understanding the impact of globalization on cross-culture communication is imperative for organizations seeking to create a competitive advantage in the global market. Regional, ethnic, and religious cultures account for differences with countries; ethnic and religious groups often transcend political country borders. These groups form minorities at the crossroads between the dominant culture of the nation and their own traditional group culture (Hofstede, et., al, 2010). An effective global leader, when crossing country and cultural borders a transformation should occur asking ourselves, who we are and how we see ourselves. Global businesses must understand how to communicate with employees and customers from different cultures in order to fulfill the organization’s mission and build value for stakeholders (McCall & Hollenbeck, 2002). To achieve goals and avoid cultural misunderstandings, leaders should and need to be culturally sensitive and promote creativity and motivation through flexible leadership. Cross-culture leaders should be culturally sensitive and promote creativity and motivation through flexible
Is There a Racial Difference in Intelligence? Starting with birth, most Americans are consistently measured and their abilities consistently assessed. While no clear definition of intelligence has been adopted universally, in general, definitions stress either an ability to adapt to environment, the capacity to learn, or the ability to think abstractly. Like the
Intelligence can be defined in many different ways since there are a variety of individual differences. Intelligence to me is the ability to reason and respond quickly yet accurately in all aspects of life, such as physically, emotionally, and mentally. Anyone can define intelligence because it is an open-ended word that has much room for interpretation. Thus my paper is an attempt to find the meaning of human intelligence. There are a couple of scientists who have tried to come up with theories of what makes a human being intelligent.
Maznevski, M. (2008). How Cultural Intelligence can improve performance. Retrieved Mar 26, 2014 from http://www.imd.org/research/challenges/TC081-08.cfm
... we are able to characterize the nation’s personality. Cultural awareness will outline each individual temperament coming as one whole.
The initiation of intercultural effectiveness can be derived from behaviour impacted by its cultural differences and “cultural self-awareness includes recognition of one’s own cultural influences upon values, beliefs, and judgements, as well as the influences derived from the professional’s work culture” (Winkelman, 2005, p. 9)
The very concept of intelligence has been shown to vary across cultures, as seen in the works by Sternberg (2002) and Mpofu, Ntinda, and Oakland (2012). The conclusions drawn in these two articles could be very useful in our American society, especially in schools across the nation. They also give important insight on just how perceptions can differ between cultures, therefore giving us a basis to use when trying to explain or avoid ethnocentricity.
Therefore, it is essential to study nonverbal and verbal communication Nonverbal communication is all forms of communication other than words themselves, which includes “body motions; vocal qualities; and the use of time, space, and even smell” (Neuliep, 2011, p. 269). On the other hand verbal communication or language “consists of symbols in the form of spoken or written words (Wood, 2014, p. 67). Thus cultures have different representations of symbols and what one culture interprets another may define or view differently. Communication is closely related to culture because communication expresses and alters culture. In a culture you learn behaviors and acceptable ideologies. This can be seen in verbal and nonverbal communication. For example, the tone of your voice is based on culture. Without communication you are unable to establish cultural differences. Your own culture directly shapes how one communicates, such as when it is appropriate to make eye contact. We are not born knowing when and how we should speak; this is a learned behavior that is taught by interaction with others. This is not an easy task because nonverbal signals differ from culture to culture. Charles Braithwaite stated, “One of the fundamental components of cultural and linguistic competence is knowing how and when to use silence as a communication tactic” (Neuliep, 2011, p. 64). Before one can communicate effectively one must understand the context in which the culture exchanges information. One must have a working awareness of how each society conveys meaning, hence high vs. low context cultures. According to the Central Michigan University text, organizational dynamics and human behavior (2009), to become a successful international manager one must develop “cross-cultural skills”. One part of the skill set involves the comprehension of the difference between high-context and low-context