Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
positivist theory vs constructionist theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: positivist theory vs constructionist theory
Research Methods PSYCG 1514
Assignment 1
1. Name and briefly describe (2-3 sentences each) the four worldviews discussed in Chapter 1 of the Creswell text. Describe which one (or combination) most closely aligns with your own worldview and why. How does one’s cultural worldview impact the research process?
The postpositivist worldview reflects more of a quantitative approach than a qualitative approach to research and challenges the traditional idea of absolute knowledge by recognizing that what is observed is human behavior. Postpositivists philosophies are deterministic (cause determines effect), reductionistic (reduces ideas into a small, discrete set to test), carefully observed and measurable, and need testing to be verified.
The constructivists worldview is typically an approach to qualitative research. Constructivists philosophies include understanding (seek understanding or meaning of subjective events
…show more content…
The researcher should be cognizant of the setting and minimize intrusion on the participants by impacting the research site as little as possible.
Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence. If the researcher does not respect the site, environment and culture, then the researcher would run the risk of negatively affecting humans and nonhumans in that area.
Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility. Part of fidelity and responsibility is establishing a trustful relationship with those whom the psychologist is working with or studying. If the psychologist disrupts the site and disrupts the lives of others, that psychologist risks breaking rapport and ruining that therapeutic or scientific relationship.
Principle C: Integrity. The psychologist should not employ deceptive practices to access protected sites. For example, if the research wanted to observe sacred ritualistic burial practices and was denied permission from a governing entity, the psychologist should not trespass just to gather
All participants should be able to discuss the procedure and the findings with the psychologist. If they had been deceived they must be told and explained why, as well as being told about their role in the experiment. Any questions must be answered honestly and as fully as possible.
First of all, integrity means being honest to the participants, which requires telling the participants everything that will or might happen during the experiment. However, for this experiment, the participants had no clue about what will happen during the experiment except for knowing their role only, which was either a prison guard or a prisoner. Same thing applies to the Professional and scientific responsibility principle, which went against the ethical code as the participants knew their role only, but not any specific information about what might happen during the experiment and how to appropriately behave under certain circumstances. Respecting people’s rights and dignity principal is the one extremely went against the ethical codes. This is the one created all the problems and completely changed the expectation of the experiment. The most important right of any experiment is to protect the participants from any harm, but this experiment couldn’t protect it. As the prison guards were in higher position, they behaved like a real prison guards and did what a typical prison guard does. Nevertheless, prison
American Psychological Association. (2014). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Codes of Conduct. Retrieved December 17, 2014, from American Psychological Association: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
Knapp, S.J. (Ed.); Gottlieb, M.C. (Ed.); Handelsman, M.M. (Ed.); VandeCreek, L.D. (Ed.). (2012). APA handbook of ethics in psychology, Vol 1: Moral foundations and common themes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
“Constructivism is a new approach in education that claims humans are better able to understand the information they have constructed by themselves. According to constructivist theories, learning is a social advancement that involves language, real world situations, and interaction and collaboration among learners. The learners are considered to be central in the learning process. Learning is affected by our prejudices, experiences, the time in which we live, and both physical and mental maturity.( http://fountainmagazine.com/Issue/detail/CONSTRUCTIVISM-in-Piaget-and-Vygotsky-Issue 48 / October - December 2004,CONSTRUCTIVISM in Piaget and Vygotsky Ozgur
Constructivism theorists believe that learning is an ongoing collective application of knowledge where past knowledge and hands on experience meet. This theory also believes that students are naturally curious. If students are naturally curious, their curio...
Applefield, J M, Huber, R, Moallem, M 2001, ‘Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding’, High School Journal, vol. 84, issue 2, p35, 19pp
Positivist Paradigm is when the researcher separates reality from his/her knowledge to create an “objective reality” in which to conduct research. This paradigm focuses on the true truth of reality. Discovers broad patterns of behavior. Primarily uses quantitative data and relies on easily manipulated experimental
... whom materials are taken. There are a number of issues which are involved in the system of ethical conduction in research.
There are five general principles that are used to guide psychology related careers to their best potential. The first principle is beneficence and nonmaleficence. In the first principle, it discusses that psychologists should only do good deeds and not do anything that will harm the participants or patients. Psychologists must consider the patience safety before continuing with the experiment or research. In the Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility, the principle addresses how psychologists should build a relationship with their colleagues and develop trust with their patients. Also, psychologists should be responsible for their actions and abide by the standards of conduct in a professional manner. The third principle is integrity and expresses how psychologists should not cause fraud, cheat or lie. Psychologists must advocate a virtuous practice within their studies or teachings. For example, they may not skew the data to fit their hypothesis or use deceive others. The fourth principle is justice ...
According to Creswell (2007) in Quality Inquiry & Research Design, everybody sees the world of research from different perspectives. Therefore, the assumption of researchers who choose the qualitative methods approach reflects their own views on the subject matter at hand. Creswell suggest, “When researchers do this, their research becomes shaped by bringing it into the inquiry paradigms, views of the world. Creswell suggest when qualitative researcher views vary according to the beliefs they bring into their research, which represent paradigms” (pg. 19).
The fourth principle is justice. In this setting, justice does not mean that it is applied in a court of law but in the fact that psychologist should be aware of who they’re providing help or information to. For instance, if a known convict comes to you for help you reserve the right to turn him down and should, assuming he wasn’t posing a threat to you. A psychologist should also be sure that their work is complete and concise before publishing it and also that it is available to everyone who may want it (Ethics: An
Constructivism is a method that says students learn by building their schema by adding to their prior knowledge by the use of scaffolding (Rhinehart Neas). Because the students are basically teaching themselves new information, the teacher is there mainly for support and guidance for the students.
Cultural relativism is a moral theory. Moral theories are designed to help us figure out what actions are right and wrong. In the theory of cultural relativism, the theory holds that there is no universal morality that is recognized amongst all cultures. In an article on this theory, James Rachel’s states several characteristics of cultural relativism, each distinguished as either supporting, or neglecting the theory itself: 1. Different societies have different moral codes; 2. There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one societal code better than another; 3. The moral code of our own society has no special status, it is merely one among many; 4. There is no “ universal truth” in ethics; 5. The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society; 6. It is mere arrogance for us to try to judge the conduct of other peoples. We should adopt an attitude of tolerance towards practices of other cultures.
I would describe constructivist learning as a process that allows learners to actively engage in the learning of new concepts through hands on activities, class discussions, awareness programs etc which enables them to construct their own understanding and knowledge through experience and reflection. Rather, than passively receiving information from the educator. (Concepts to classrooms, 2004). In a constructivist classroom knowledge is constructed through an active and metal process by the learners; learners build and create their own meanings and knowledge”. Constructivist learning occurs when learners are given opportunities to engage with the subject content