The Crucible Power Analysis

1465 Words3 Pages

American author, John Steinbeck once said, “Power does not corrupt. Fear corrupts - perhaps the fear of loss of power”. As seen in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, people of authority can feel pressured to go along with actions or make decisions they know are wrong because they fear losing their power and influence in society. They also tend to let to their opinions and motives impact their work and responsibility to make good decisions. The Crucible demonstrates how people of authority, like Parris and Danforth, try to use good judgement to make fair decisions, but are often influenced by their own personal opinions whether they realize it or not. Reverend Parris became a minister because he regarded himself to be holy and was blessed by God …show more content…

A judge is someone who presides over court proceedings, and makes impartial decisions in the pursuit of justice. Danforth is a loyal judge to the court and is passionate about making sure justice is served. When Proctor and Cory try to free their wives, he informs them that, “In an ordinary crime… one calls up witnesses to prove his innocence. But witchcraft is… on its face and by its nature, an invisible crime… Therefore, who may possibly be witness to it? The witch and the victim. None other. Now we cannot hope the witch will accuse herself; granted? Therefore, we must rely upon her victims… ” (Pg. 93) Danforth has authority in the court and has the power to determine who is guilty and who is innocent. Deep down inside, Danforth probably realizes that by relying on spectral evidence, innocent people will probably be hung; yet, he goes through with it because he values the court system. Miller also used the theme of reputation to illustrate how society can pressure individuals into going against what they think is right. Although he might not realize it, Danforth is afraid that going against the court trials for individuals he thinks are innocent could damage his reputation as a judge. Then when Proctor has Mary Warren, one of the accusers, confess that she lied about witchcraft, Danforth thoroughly interrogates her to make certain that her new claim is the truth. He says, “ you tell me that you sat in my court, callously lying, …show more content…

In the play, after Abigail runs away, it becomes obvious that she lied and that she left to escape punishment. Parris wants to postpone the hangings and get more people to confess. He suggests to Danforth, “Excellency, I would postpone these hangin’s for a time… This way, unconfessed and claiming innocence, doubts are multiplied, many honest people will weep for them, and our good purpose is lost in their tears.” (Pg. 118) With Abigail gone, people know that innocent people were hanged and might chose to blame authority for being so easily deceived. Parris realizes that his supporting the trials could reflect badly on his reputation as a church official; thus, he begins to request for postponements and encourage people to ‘confess’. For Parris, it is less about proving people innocent or guilty but about clearing his name so he does not lose his power in the church. On the other hand, Danforth chooses to continue with the hangings. He says, “Now hear me, and beguile yourselves no more. I will not receive a single plea for pardon or postponement. Them that will not confess will hang. Twelve are already executed; the names of those seven are given out, and the village expects to see them die this morning. Postponement now speaks a floundering of them that died till now.” (Pg. 119) Danforth refuses to stop the hangings or pardon anyone because Danforth does not want to

Open Document