The Crucible Movie Vs Book

487 Words1 Page

The Crucible was a play written about the false accusations towards people in Salem that were apparent “witches” and out to get others on behalf of Satan. None of which was true, and many innocent were put to death because of the lying, deceiving children. Arthur Miller really made his point across by writing this play and showing the reader the actual truth behind the hidden lies of the government during the time this was written. Reading and watching these events were both educational, but watching the events occur made The Crucible easier to understand the characters they portray and the emotions and thoughts of each character throughout the movie.

Abigail Williams, a little villainess who causes basically almost all of the accusations and mass hysteria in The Crucible. She is manipulative, vengeful, and a magnificent liar. She was willing to do anything to get her way, especially for John Proctor who she chased like a lovesick puppy. In the play it became very difficult to interpret the slang they used to write this play like “I have a sense for heat, John, and yours has drawn me to my window, and I have seen you looking up, burning in your loneliness. Do you tell me you’ve never looked up at my window?” which without long discussion is very confusing. But in the film, even without understanding a word, based on emotions and actions you can …show more content…

In the written play the audience is forced to imagine the surroundings and outfits these characters wore during that time period. The film is well spoken of and one top critic states “ Arthur Miller's screenplay keeps everything nice and faithful to the period, and the actors have the dirt on their hands to prove it. The movie lacks polish as well, and that's to everyone's benefit”. The film gets every dramatical event, acting, and scenery that the written play failed to

Open Document