Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Perspective on the right to counsel
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Perspective on the right to counsel
Criminal procedures protect individual’s rights through a set of rules stipulating on how investigations should be conducted. In this paper, I will analyze the criminal justice process and explain what happens during this process. State prosecutions go by the procedure code of the state, but typically mimic the Federal Guidelines, so I will attempt to explain most of the process under those Federal Guidelines up to the rights of the defendant through pre-trial proceedings.
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are the procedural rules that oversee how federal criminal prosecutions are conducted in United States district courts and the general trial courts of the U.S. government. To start off, I will discuss the arraignment. During the arraignment,
…show more content…
At this time many choose to exercise their right to counsel if not sooner, but the right can be exercised as soon as the defendant is questioned about the crime. Right to Counsel states “every defendant who is unable to obtain counsel shall be entitled to have counsel assigned to represent him at every stage of criminal proceeding”. That includes the pre-trial. The rightDuring the arraignment, the defendant may not be present if he has been charged by indictment or misdemeanor, have a signed written waiver by both the defendant and defense, stating that the defendant received a copy of the indictment with the plea being not guilty, and that the court accepts it. After the arraignment, there is the preliminary hearing. During the preliminary hearing, it is up to the judge to determine if there is enough evidence in order for the case to go to trial. During this stage of the criminal procedure, the prosecutor can call on witnesses to testify, and also introduce
Pretrial court is usually within a week from the date that you committed the offense. Did you know that if you can't afford a lawyer, the court would appoint you one? It is the law that you have to be represented by a lawyer during the time of your trial unless you sign a waiver to not have a lawyer at all.
In chapter twelve, Joel Samaha has discussed various court proceedings before trial. Samaha begins to elaborate the importance of the prosecutor’s decision in determining whether there is a concrete case against the alleged defendant. The evidence at hand ultimately dictates the proceeding of events in court. Along with evidence, the lack of resources might add to the difficulty in charging an individual. Prosecutors are faced with an overload of cases; ultimately prosecutors are forced to prioritize their cases based on their resources and the evidence provided. The cases that are regarded are then considered for suspect detainment. Probable cause to detain suspects is undergone so that the case may proceed to trial. Typically an arraignment
Well written procedures, rules, and regulation provide the cornerstone for effectively implementing policies within the criminal justice system. During the investigational process, evidence collected is subjected to policies such as Search and Seizure, yet, scrutinized by the Exclusionary Rule prior to the judicial proceeding. Concurrent with criminal justice theories, evidence collected must be constitutionally protected, obtained in a legal and authorized nature, and without violations of Due Process. Although crime and criminal activities occur, applicability of policies is to ensure accountability for deviant behaviors and to correct potentially escalation within social communities It is essential the government address such deviant behavior, however, equally important is the protection of the accused which also must become a priority when investigating criminal cases.
The entire criminal justice system can be very frightening and even intimidating if someone fails to understand the meaning of terms used, procedures, laws, and rules (Cook, 2009). Criminal law is among the terms that have been defined differently by various sources. It is mainly concerned with a system of legal rules defining actions that are classified as crimes and the manner of which the government prosecutes people who commit crimes (Snyman, 2014). According to the chapter, some sources use it in a way that is very general that describes it as the entire spectrum of laws that deal with the criminal justice system while others use shorthand ways which terms it as substantive criminal law, which is very true.
U.S. Department of Justice. 2002. “What is the Sequence of Events in the Criminal Justice System?”
"Criminal Procedure and the Supreme Court: A Guide to the Major Decisions on ..." Google Books. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Feb. 2014.
Roberson, C., Wallace, H., & Stuckey, G. B. (2013). Procedures in the justice system (1st ed.). [Vitalsource or Kaplan University]. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781269223119/pages/76743177
In summation, there is no real way to dismiss the utilization of certain rules to protect and or eliminate evidence. The defendant must preserve his or her constitutional rights. The prosecution and investigators must also be accountable to these rights to ensure that the judicial system in this nation does not become a mêlée of wrongful or unfair convictions, which may be motivated by speed and necessity, rather than good experienced police and legal work. It is also important to note that many legal violations of the disclosure laws and events that would obtain the use of the exclusionary rule have ended in false convictions, giving further proof to the efficacy of the law. The rules for presenting evidence are designed to help the court and jury establish truth and administer justice (Paul B. Watson, 1986).
The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.
However, in the real world the process is not as seamless and rapid one would observe on television. There are normally two trial for homicide cases, one for conviction and the second for sentencing. In this paper this author will explain the trial process for homicide investigation and the main stages of the trial . Moreover, the uniqueness of homicide investigations in relation to other crime that goes to jury trial will be examined. Lastly, an explanation to why all capital murder cases go to trial will be discussed.
I wanted to look at the investigative and criminal procedures following the arrest of an alleged criminal and the powerful effects via testimonies and evidence (or lack thereof) it can have on a case.There is an importance of the courts in regards to crime that can’t be over looked. The primary function of the criminal justice system is to uphold the established laws, which define what we understand as deviant in this society.
Both the federal government and states have authority to prosecute for criminal behavior in the United States. Each has their own criminal statutes, court systems, prosecutors, and police agencies to help deter crime. These criminal statutes control how suspects are investigated charged and tried. The court system institutes rules and policies that consist of their own structures and procedures within each state. Prosecutors are the most powerful and influential representatives of the court system. Sometimes a case can begin in a lower court then work its way up to a higher court depending on the crime. The law enforcers are made up of small town police officials and go all the way up to large federal agencies.
They are hired by the defendant and sometimes even appointed to someone that is not able to pay for one. The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees every person the right to be represented by a qualified attorney. In Miranda V. Arizona, the Supreme Court mandated that every person who is arrested be informed of this right and that if they cannot afford an attorney, the court will provide one (Klein, 2012). These defense attorneys are impelled by law to assist their clients by making sure that they are treated fairly by the United States justice system. Their jobs see that people are granted the right to a trail by a jury of their peers, the right of innocent until proven guilty, the right to a speedy and public trial, and the right to remain silent (Klein, 2012). Lawyers are a necessary part of the criminal justice system.
Police, courts, and corrections are separated government institutions with different goals, histories, and operating procedures. Law enforcement officials report crimes that happen in their area. Officers investigate crimes and gather evidence to identify and use against a presumed perpetrator. Thus, it is the duty of the officer to uphold the rights of offenders, victims, and to conduct police procedures within rules set by law. Depending on the nature of the crime and the evidence gathered it is up to the police discretion to make an arrest or issue a citation for the accused to appear in court. The law enforcement has responsibilities that no other component does, thus an officer does not decide the defendant’s conviction; the jury does (Neubauer and Fradella,
The prosecutor and criminal investigator square measure 2 cogs that have to work along to achieve success in making an attempt a criminal case. The prosecutor should swear upon the investigator to tell them of all aspects of the case that they designed, and the investigator must accept the functionary to achieve justice for the victim, their family, and the community. Any criminal trial is an adversarial match between the functionary and the defense and facets either side can use all the data on the market to them to induce a win for his or her side.