The Crebal Banter In The Play 'By Oscar Wilde'

674 Words2 Pages

The play contains a constant exchange of verbal banter between the characters. Wilde does this in a comical way, while still using the witty remarks as a way to satirize the absurdities and excesses in the character’s lives. Lady Bracknell, Gwendolen’s mother, is a lady of high society, and she bases her life on the standards and morals that the Victorian society proposes. The film replaces the verbal banter with physical humor which ultimately loses the satire and wit the characters have in the play. In Act I of the play, Lady Bracknell questions Jack about his life in order to approve her daughter’s engagement to him. Her questions are based on what the society deems important, instead of what she, as a mother, should care about. Lady Bracknell says, “Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes … What is your income?” (Act I. 1435). Obviously, the verbal banter between Lady Bracknell and Jack is quite comical, but more importantly it satirizes the things that Lady Bracknell and the Victorians value essential. The film modifies this scene into a more visual one for a modern audience. Lady Bracknell and Jack still have their witty conversation; however, Wilde’s intended effect of the verbal banter is lost. The director modified the verbal banter because a modern audience most likely would not comprehend Wilde’s intentions. The visual aspect of this scene is the director’s way of expressing the satires of the Victorian morals in a way that the modern audience will understand. In the film, this scene is made visual as Jack enters Lady Bracknell’s home. Large pillars, expensive paintings, and grandiose doors create the mood. She sits ...

... middle of paper ...

...ilde uses humor to mock the morals of the Victorian society. The director made several changes in the film in order to appeal to a modern audience. The director’s changes were not meant to undermine Wilde’s intentions of the play, but to express it in a way that a modern audience can understand. While the film remains true to the play, Parker’s modifications of lines, verbal banter, and physical humor inevitably detracted from the concerns Wilde was addressing in his play. Even though Parker didn’t drastically change the lines, it ultimately overshadowed the sartorial aspect of the play. Parker’s changes can be justified by his attempt to amuse a modern audience with physical humor rather than the satires that come along with the verbal banter. In the play the verbal banter is used to provide humor with witty responses between characters that satirize their morals.

Open Document