Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A talk to teachers rhetorical analysis
Importance of teaching writing
A proposal for rhetorical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A talk to teachers rhetorical analysis
Composition and Rhetoric (a.k.a. Writing Studies): A Flexible Field
In his essay, "Teach Writing as a Process not a Product," Donald Murray outlines the major difference between the traditional pedagogy that directed the teaching of writing in the past and his newly hailed model. Traditionally, Murray explains, English teachers were taught to teach and evaluate students' writing as if it was a finished product of literature when, as he has discovered, students learn better if they're taught that writing is a process. For Murray, once teachers regard writing as a process, a student-centered, or writer-centered, curriculum falls into place. Rules for writing fall by the way side as writers work at their own pace to see what works best for them.
While Murray emphasizes the emancipating affect that a process-oriented curriculum has on students, Andrea Lunsford explains how the process approach to writing--adopted by and aligned with the field of Composition and Rhetoric--frees not only students, but teachers and scholars as well. Theories governing Composition and Rhetoric break down boundaries "between disciplines, between the genres of reading, writing and speaking, between the theory and practice, between research and teaching." Janice M. Lauer and Andrea Lunsford similarly point out the cross-disciplinary nature of Composition and Rhetoric and how this creates and directs scholarship in the field.
In their short essay, "The Place of Rhetoric and Composition in Doctoral Studies," Janice Lauer and Andrea Lunsford argue that flexibility and boundary crossing is inherent to research in the field of Composition and Rhetoric as well. In an effort to respond to the many issues that stem from the study of language and its use in ...
... middle of paper ...
...re within which writing is created, evaluated and taught.
Works Cited
Faigley, Lester. "Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal. College English. Vol. 48: 6 (1986).
Lauer, Janice M. and Andrea Lunsford. "The Place of Rhetoric and Composition in Doctoral Studies." Ed. Andrea Lunsford, Helene Moglen and James F. Slevin. The Future of Doctoral Studies in English. New York: Modern Language Association, 1989. 106-110
Lunsford, Andrea A. "Rhetoric and Composition." Introduction to Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literature. Ed.Joseph Gibaldi. New York: Modern Language Association, 1992.
Miller, Susan. Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.
Murray, Donald M. Rhetoric and Composition: A Sourcebook for Teachers. Ed. Richard L. Graves. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton Cook, 1984. 89-94.
Olson, Annie. “An Introduction to Rhetoric.” Le Tourneau U, May 2006. Web. 6 Dec. 2011.
The AP Language and Composition course is purely designed to help students excel in their own stories, but more importantly, become more attentive to their surroundings. A conscientious goal, that would properly be attained through the collection of nonfiction paperbacks. Because of the purpose of this course and the current state of today’s children, one must undeniably agree that in selecting the “perfect book”, the overall idea of self-reliance would hold a prominent factor. This curriculum not only focuses on the rhetorical analysis of nonfiction texts, but it attempts to make students distinguish how the world plays with the dialectic of persuasion, also known as the art of rhetoric. In doing so, this course aims at making students aware
Palmer, William. "Rhetorical Analysis." Discovering Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Writing, and Style. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2012. 268-69. Print.
In his essay entitled “The Rhetorical Stance,” Wayne Booth describes how rhetorical stance is imperative for good writing. I agree with Booth that by using rhetoric stance in our writing we can produce and powerful and well-written argument. How then do we know if we are using the art of rhetoric in our writing? According to Booth, “Rhetoric is the art of finding and employing the most effective means of persuasion on any subject, considered independently of intellectual mastery of that subject" (199). In making this comment Booth urges us to be knowledgeable on the subject we are writing about and use passion and emotional appeals to strengthen our argument. Booth gives his readers a good explanation of what the word means and how it is portrayed in essays.
The Stases and Other Rhetorical Concepts from Introduction to Academic Writing. N.p.: n.p., n.d. PDF.
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
Longaker, Mark Garrett, and Jeffrey Walker. Rhetorical Analysis: A Brief Guide for Writers. Glenview: Longman, 2011. Print.
The impact and effectiveness of using proper rhetoric was a strategy of “good” writing that I was not aware of until my senior year of high school. While taking AP Language and Composition my junior year, my fellow students and I believed that we had survived countless essay workshop activities and writing assignments with emphasis on word choices, grammatical structure, syntax, punctuation and spelling. By the time we had entered AP Literature our senior year, we felt we could achieve success; we already knew how to write in the correct format and structur...
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Russel K. Durst. "They Say/I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing: With Readings. Vol. 2e. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2012. Print.
Student's Book of College English: Rhetoric, Reader, Research Guide and Handbook. Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2012. 402-405.
to Writing. The Basics. Visual Rhetoric. Readings. Ed. Dore Ripley. Pleasant Hill: DVC, 2013 83-89.
McKay, B., & McKay, K. (2011, May 04). Classical rhetoric 101: The five canons of rhetoric.
Last semester I was a part of Chelsey Hauge’s Rhetoric and Composition class. Chelsey had our class take a trip to library to get more information about the resources and research techniques available to us, just as our Intro to Literary Studies class did on February 16th. I found both visits informative and helpful, though they were similar in many ways.
As I prepared to take this writing class, I wasn’t sure of what to expect. Writing has always been a challenge for me because I have never really learned how to write properly. However, after taking this course I have discovered that writing isn’t something to be feared. It is a great way of giving my thoughts and ideas life. The strategies I have learned and practiced in the class has help me to gain a better understanding of writing as a discipline.
Shea, Renee, Lawrence Scanlon, and Robin Scanlon. The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford St. Martins, 2013. 525-529,546-551. Print.