The Codes Of Gender Socialization In Pop Culture

738 Words2 Pages

In the article Shortchanging Girls, Peggy Orenstein addresses the differences between gender socialization in school. In the begging of the article, Peggy addresses that “many of today’s girls fall into traditional patterns of low self-image, self-doubt, and self-censorship…” (Orenstein pg.28). What interested me about this sentence was the use of “traditional”, when describing the patterns. It shows that these three patterns have become common within young girls, which focuses on the “why” they develop. In the article, Peggy mentions that it’s more common for girls to follow the rules when speaking in class. For example, girls tend to raise their hand to answer a question. While, “boys will speak out in class… and are more willing to argue …show more content…

Not being able to determine ones gender, send mix signals and confusion. When referring to female athletes and advertisements, the film acknowledges that athlete’s pictures are feminized. Meaning that they make sure they are seen as real women, as sports can be more defined as masculine. In their pictures they are found looking over their shoulder, hugging themselves, and even biting their fingers. In the film study, Men talk and women show skin, Nanci Hellmich, compares the roles that both males and females hold in movies and television. In movies women are more likely to be seen in the scenes rather than heard. When it comes to percentages with in speaking roles, women have less than half of the roles men do. Women and young girls, receive attention primarily because of their physical appearance and the clothing they were on scene. Female socialization, within the entertainment business, is not primarily based on their speaking roles, but rather by their looks. The article Invisible Masculinity, by Machel S. Kimmel, starts by addressing that men have no history and how there aren’t any books that speak about the experience of being a man, like there are books about women. The article also links the history of gender and power, by mentioning how the “construction of gender is a

Open Document