The lack of privacy and increased transparency has caused people to think as a group. There are no more secrets kept from others, putting a lot of pressure on everybody to be accepted. This is the main cause of group thinking. Thinking as a group can be a good thing in certain occasions but in a large society, can be unproductive. Everybody would share the same opinions and the world would become stagnant. There’d be no more emerging engineers and the Circle and all of its inventions would eventually peak. There would no longer be individual identities. With all of the technological advancements made by the Circle, the concept of groupthink seemed unavoidable.
Anytime that you can find a collection of people that think similarly, you’ll find that it’s often hard to get them to change their mind about something. They are very loyal to the group’s ideas and don’t tend to stray away from them at all. The Circle had a couple inventions that really reinforced this. The SeeChange cameras and the meters that went along with them have been primary causes to convincing people not to stray from their ideas. These allowed for anybody to see what was going on and reflect upon it in real time. Mae in particular became very affected by this. She needed to get approval for everything she did, thus she wasn’t thinking for herself. Everybody’s minds came together to approve or reject what Mae was doing and in a sense, had complete control over her. She was hesitant to express or even try out her own ideas because she didn’t want to be different and criticized.
Another trait of group thinkers is that they can be easily led, or mislead, by their superior or leaders. When Mae suggested a Circle account should be mandatory in o...
... middle of paper ...
...of stopping the Circle, he was turned in to the other founders of the company. He was renowned as one of the smartest people around but even he was belittled and dismissed once he tried disputing the ideas of the society.
The people in The Circle have demonstrated that transparency can cause group thinking traits. Transparency was pressuring people to fit in with the general public and as result, they weren’t thinking for themselves. They also saw things with a bias twist on them. Anything the Circle believed in was seen as the right thing and that showed throughout the book. All of these traits are evidence that the way of life created by the need to conform can cause people to stop thinking for themselves and lose their creativity. It’s an unproductive way of life for a growing society and seems almost unavoidable if everyone were to become transparent.
The author of the essay, Carol Tavris, seems to be very passionate about what she is writing. She has her doctorate in Psychology and has had her articles published in many well-known magazines. The intended audience of her essay is the general public. The purpose of this article is to inform the public that they need to stand out and use their own minds in a group setting instead of hiding in the comfort of their fellow friends and colleagues.
Are you a self-reliant individual, or do you generate more ideas while working in a group? Groupthink has always been the dysfunctional idea that results from within a group that seeks harmony and conformity. Groupthink has been seen in Salem, MA, specifically in The Crucible, where townsfolk would go around accusing women, often innocent, of witchcraft. It has also been seen during the Red Scare, where Senator McCarthy would create a list of celebrities and other well-known people that he would accuse of being communists in the United States. At the time, Americans were against the idea of the communists and communism due to the fact that the Soviet Union, which had a communist government, was threatening to bomb the US. Thus, anyone who was
From the Velasquez excerpt he explains Janis definition of Group think which refers to the susceptibility of groups of people to get increasingly out of touch with reality (Janis 84). Velasquez believes the main cause of groupthink is socials pressures within the group due to the group wanting to get along and keep harmony (Janis 84). When a group really wants to have a good standing relationship with each other they could possibly just agree on something to not upset the others, or to make them not like them for their beliefs and not agreeing resulting in them not evaluating the situation. This negatively affects ones decision making outcome. Groupthink as any other problem has symptoms and we will go over each of these.
despised by even those who's careers he began, and lives he had changed. In one meeting
...and his passion for the car industry to merge two car companies together in order for them to benefit from each other at a precise time in the market when he was able to be successful. He understood the problems the company faced, the demand in the market, and he had a clear vision on how to solve it. He gave himself timelines and goals and each were met with great success.
My analysis is on the film The Goonies. While I view the movie and determine the various norms, behaviors, roles and interaction between group members, as well as individuals the examination within the realm of film can present many of the same components. Thus, our group selected this movie to analyze based on its formation of a cohesive problem-solving group full of unforgettable characters. The Goonies portray many different theories and aspects of small group communication.
reputation. His rejection of societal limitations and steadfast individualism was truly commendable, however, his mannerisms were extremely rude. He cast aside all tact and consideration of others because he was so consumed with himself. “He coldly and fully stated his opinion without affecting to believe that it was the opinion of the company. It was of no consequence, if every one present held the opposite opinion.” (p. 1237) The motivations for a number of his decisions seem unclear. Integrity and discipline can be easily confused with conceit and narcissism. The extent of his appeal can be argued because his actions can be interpreted in a negative or positive light, depending on the audience.
In conclusion, something happens to individuals when they collect in a group, they act differently to the way they would on their own, regardless of whether the group has gathered to solve problems, make decisions or have fun, and regardless of whether the members know each other. (Psychology in perspective, third edition, Tavris and Wade, 2001)
Groupthink is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines which could have drastic results. It is the result of group polarization where discussions are enhance or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group. Therefore, if a group leans towards risky situation at the beginning of the discussion on average they will move toward an even riskier position. (Marks, 2015). The idea when everyone think the same no one is really thinking. The drastic outcomes result from people trying to avoid conflict with one another, being highly cohesive, and results is questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions
According to former American Businessman, Henry Ford, he describes working as a team as, “Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success.” When working with a group there will always be struggles and roadblocks that could lead your group to any form of success. However, it takes a successful group leader who is able to keep the group working together to reach the common goal as working as one. This paper will demonstrate the integration and understanding of group dynamics and structure. I have selected the Delta Alpha Pi Honor Society to discuss the following five main principles in each group: the purpose of the group, the individuals and their roles of the group, the structure and the norms that
It is a fact, that when an individual builds more credit, the group tolerates more of his idiosyncratic behavior (Brown, 2000). It has been examined that according to group members, idiosyncrasy credit is considered to be a reliable and a positive form, when compared to leadership. The member of
Johnson and Johnson (1987) defined a group, as two or more individuals in face-to-face contact, were each member is aware of their membership within the group, aware of others who belong to the group and also aware of their optimistic interdependence as they endeavor to accomplish shared goals. This essay will present evidence to explain Jake’s behavior within the group by using Social Psychology with reference to the concept of social loafing.
Imagine a world in which all of life’s problems could all just go away at the click of a button. A world where every individual on the face of planet earth is being watched 24/7, therefore eliminating any possibility of a crime being committed. Imagine, if just for a moment, a world where everyone and everything are connected by the same network, which would in essence create a full and complete circle. This is the world that serves as the setting for Dave Eggers novel The Circle. The Circle is a novel about Mae, the young and enthusiastic protagonist, who gets a job at a company known as The Circle. The Circle is a revolutionary company that is creating all sorts of new and exciting technology that appear to benefit the human race as a whole.
Recounting the lives of one Belgian couple, The Broken Circle Breakdown (Felix Van Groeningen 2012) follows the relationship between Didier (Johan Heldenbergh) and Elise (Veerle Baetens), beginning with their initial stages of their relationship before ending on the latter’s suicide after the death of their daughter, Maybelle (Nell Cattrysse). The syuzhet, however, goes against the conventional order of their narrative, instead creating a greater emotional impact by constructing itself as temporally discontinuous. By presenting later episodes of the fabula first, the audience becomes aware of the fact that the family’s moments of happiness are ultimately fleeting; in turn, all the viewer can see is their impending heartbreak. Further, with
our thought process, and how we contribute to the process of group work. This involves a