Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Distinguish between comedy and tragedy
Distinguish between comedy and tragedy
Critical essay about The Cherry Orchard
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Distinguish between comedy and tragedy
The Cherry Orchard: Critical Analysis
The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov is about a Russian family that is unable to prevent its beloved estate from being sold in an auction due to financial problems. The play has been dubbed a tragedy by many of its latter producers. However, Chekhov labeled his play a farce, or more of a comedy. Although this play has a very tragic backdrop of Russia's casualty-ridden involvement in both World Wars and the Communist Revolution, the characters and their situations suggest a light-hearted tone, even though they struggle against the upcoming loss of the orchard. Apathy and passivity plague the characters and contribute often to the comic side of things. Sometimes, however, the passivity erupts the tragic flaws of the characters as they fail to save the estate. Another theme of The Cherry Orchard is the thin line between reality and outer appearance between which the characters cannot distinguish. Although indirect, this confusion provides the play yet again with comedy. On the contrary, the confusion is also seen as another tragic flaw of the characters contributing to the downfall of the estate and its orchard. Another theme Chekhov portrays is the effect of choice and free will. In some surcumstances this is the ultimate form of tragedy, depending on the outcome. With this, Chekhov succeeds in confusing tragedy and comedy in his final play The Cherry Orchard.
Chekhov's characters in The Cherry Orchard contribute greatly to the comedy. The action takes place on a Russian estate belonging to Mrs. Ranevsky. There is a debate over finances and a wealthy businessman named Lopakhin, whose father was a serf on the estate, thinks of a way to solve the financial problems. The family, however, seems to ignore the problem of losing the estate. This is the first instance of comedy in that the family chooses to ignore the problems while a wealthy businessman pleads with them to take action. The family continues to ignore the future for the estate as personalities are developed in each of the characters. A very comical character is the clerk Yepikhodov, also known as 'Twenty-two Calamities.'; In his entrance he stumbles over a chair while babbling at whatever comes to his mind. Firs, a senile manservant, is the next to add comic elements as he hobbles across the stage also ...
... middle of paper ...
...and dulled in its tragic mournings. The perception of whether this is a comedy or a tragedy is a battle uselessly fought. The play clearly exhibits both a comic perception as well as a tragic one. The comedy, although more directly comes from the characters themselves, would be half as noticeable without the tragic occurrences of the family and those surrounding them. Just as with comedy, the tragic moments would not seem as tragic without the comic outbursts of the characters and their repeated failing actions. Chekhov intended The Cherry Orchard to be a comedy or farce; almost all of the producers that chose to interpret The Cherry Orchard did so as a tragedy. Clearly it is neither. It incorporates both.
Works Cited
Chekhov, Anton. 'The Cherry Orchard.'; Best Plays by Chekhov.
New York: Young, 1956. 226-296.
Corbin, John. 'Russian High Comedy.'; Galens 38-39.
Fiero, John. Galens 33-37.
Galens, David and Spampinato, Lynn. Drama For Students.
Detroit: Gale, 1998. 21-39.
Pritchett, V.S. 'Chekhov: A Spirit Set Free.'; Galens 37-38.
Main Characters: Ivan Ilyich (protagonist), Gerasim (Ivan’s peasant servant – a young healthy man), Peter Ivanovich (Ivan’s closest friend and colleague – attends his funeral), Praskovya Fëdorovna (Ivan’s terribly selfish wife – she is more upset about a loss of income, than losing her spouse)
Chekhov is the true precursor of the theater of the absurd. Before the beckettian "waiting" there was the continuous "waiting" of the three sisters who never live for Moscow. Chekhov developed an aesthetic principle, according to which tragic and comic are not separated by an impassable wall but represent two sides of the same phenomenon of life, which can be viewed both in terms of tragedy and in terms of comedy.
I think that even though Cyrano died, widowing Roxane for the second time, this play is a comic tragedy. Cyrano supplies a lot of the
The differences of these two plays, gives one a sense that any general idea can be broken into a distinct one and not sway away from its intended idea. This means, a comedy can be made into a tragedy, romance, and other themes, and yet still maintain the purpose of providing laughter to the audience. This shows the development of literature over the years, as many more subcategories result because of the contrasts.
William, Robert. ‘Is Romeo and Juliet’ a Tragedy or a comedy with tragic events?-Homework Help-Enotes.com.’Entoes.com.Enotes.com, 9 Nov.2008.Web.29Apr.2014. http://www.enotes.com/homework-help/romeo-and-juliet-tradedy-commady-tragic-46075>.
Romeo and Juliet is also a play which is full of anger, passion, and death. The secrecy of the marriage of Romeo and Juliet pointed out a form of dramatic irony. This is shown by Juliet’s “ double-edged ';phrases when Lady Capulet is denouncing Romeo. For example,
Tragedy is when something is lost in a terrible manner. The tragedy of a character named Blanche is the eventual loss of her mind and of her reality. Events throughout the tragic play A Streetcar Named Desire are what lead to Blanche become adrift in the seas of dreams within her head. Along her path to becoming this way Blanche does not only suffer herself, but causes the suffering of others around her. The author of this play uses Blanche as an instrument to carry out the tragic vision of the play itself. You see tragedy within herself and the people she comes into contact with throughout the play.
The play Romeo and Juliet is a widely known tragedy written by Shakespeare. Romeo and Juliet features two rival families and their children. When a daughter of Capulet and son of Montague meet at a party, sparks immediately fly. However, because of their families rivalry, they marry in secret, and were happy. That is until things took a turn for the worst. After an unexpected accident, Romeo is forced to leave the city, and he may never return. Juliet’s not sure she’ll ever see him again and tries to plan a way to be with Romeo, but ends up making things worse. It is an extremely tragic story. Or that’s what everyone is led to believe. However, the play Romeo and Juliet is in actuality a comedy. Between the overabundance of hyperbole, Paris’
Both processes are different, as well as the development of each character, as they are affected by race, gender, and social class. Although seemingly opposite characters, both Lizabeth from Eugenia Collier’s Marigolds, and the Lawyer from Anton Chekhov’s The Bet, have a surprising amount of similarities, which ultimately leads them to the reality of life and it’s
Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is a man that has learned to deal with a life that is an endless struggle for survival. For example, Shukhov has learned to prioritize the necessities of his life. One being a decent amount of food daily. Shukhov has been able to learn the ropes of the camp and know what he has to do and who he has to interact with in order to get them. He also knows that he should not take lightly what he has and because of that, more than once saved pieces of bread, from an already small meal, for times when he knows he will need them more. Furthermore, Shukhov knows that he is not the only one with a life like his and treats his fellow “zets” with the help and compassion they deserve. He has helped out many of the other zets learn to survive in the work camp and in turn is given more respect than others. In addition, Shukhov, although dehumanized at almost every time of the day, is still able to keep values of his own. Values of respect, to those who have earned it; self pride, so not to be pushed around by just anyone; and even after eight years of facing the bitter cold he will not eat with his hat on. It is Shukhov’s character that kept him alive and sane after eight years in the harsh Stalinist Work Camp.
The cherry orchard is used to symbolise the past or the passing of time; more precisely the orchard could be a vivid illustration of the oppressive past. Chekhov’s play almost mimics the various changes that were happening in Russia at the time as the orchard further illustrates the inability of the aristocratic class to maintain their stature and power. The argument between Mme. Ranevsky and Lopakhin is especially indicative of this rift between the classes – Ranevsky being the classic aristocrat and Lopakhin ascending from poverty and serfdom.
This creates uncertainty for the audience and mirrors the uncertainty that Estragon and Vladimir will face while they wait for Godot. Even with this simplistic setting, he adds depth to the setting through the willow tree. The willow tree is one of the only parts of the play that changes from act 1 to act 2. In act 1 the willow tree is barren and without leaves, but in act 2 the tree is flourishing with leaves. This shows how the willow tree is meant to symbolize rebirth and renewal. For instance, throughout the play, Estragon and Vladimir talk about how they should hang themselves from the willow tree. They usually talk about this right at the end of the day, but they are never able to go through the suicide. This shows Beckett’s belief on our entrapment in our cycle of life. He uses the willow tree to symbolize how even though Estragon and Vladimir’s struggle seems endless that there is a way for them to escape from this terribly monotonous cycle of life. The tree changes from day to day, but Estragon and Vladimir stay the same. The tree is this renewal of life at the start of every day, but Estragon and Vladimir fail to capture this and fall into the
...while because they know that there are still more problems to come such as Babe’s court case and the possibility of her getting sent to a mental hospital. In Williams’ plays there is longer satisfaction in the end which keeps the comedy along with the tragedy. In “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof,” Meg locks up Brick’s liquor and urges him to get her pregnant so that Big Daddy can die knowing that the land is going to his favorite son and that he has a grandkid on the way. This is a comedic ending because everyone is satisfied with what is to come and though there is tragedy, the comedy outshines it. “A Streetcar Named Desire” ends with tragedy because Stanley has to live with the guilt of causing Blanche to go insane and get sent to the mental hospital. Tragedy is best displayed in Tennessee Williams’ plays through the situations he puts his characters in and their dialogue.
In the second part of this essay expanding upon my reading of nineteenth century Russian authors, the short stories of Anton Chekhov, “The Lady with the White Dog” and the “Medical Case” will be compared. These two great authors’ whose stylistic qualities often create problems in interpretation for non-Russian speaking readers like me that I’ve thoroughly enjoyed.
Chekhov used characterization to put forward the message that greed is a truly crippling trait of mankind. Through both the actions and dialogue of the banker the reader saw how greed causes man to behave. Via the dialogue and thoughts of the dynamic character, the lawyer, the reader realized the awful results of avarice. Greed is a timeless theme that, throughout history, has had a perpetually poor outcome.