Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A winter's tale jealousy
Analysis of Shakespeare
Analysis of Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As Leontes makes his first appearance in Shakespeare's `The Winter's Tales', the reader is confronted by an aggressively insecure character. His conversation with the more relaxed Polixenes is illustrative of this. Polixenes, in his anxiety to leave, explains that he has overstayed his welcome;
`Besides, I have stay'd
To tire you royalty'
Polixenes' suggestion is clearly a polite one, a non-threatening exclamation of gratitude. However, in a representation of his competitive character, Leontes mis-comprehends this as a challenge;
`We are tougher, brother,
Tha you can put us to't'
The friendship that Camillo pointed out in Scene 1; `an affection which cannot choose but branch now', appears to have vanished in this confrontation. He identifies him and his people as `we', further increasing the competitive nature of this conversation. Polixenes timidly suggests; `No longer stay.' The tone of Leontes' reply does not expect any compromise; `One seve'night longer.' Despite this, Leontes remains insecure of his own authority over Polixenes. In fact, his behaviour during this particular episode shows Leontes as being a rather tactless figure. This is pointed out by his own wife, Hermione, who suggests that she could have done better in persuading him to stay;
`You, sir, charge him too coldly'
Hermione, however, also feels obliged to reassure her husband; `I love thee not a jar o' th' clock behind'. This reflects the rather tense nature of their marriage, and Leontes' behaviour during it. Hermione is the subject of Leontes' tactless behaviour later on in that scene;
`Hermione, my dearest, thou never spok'st to better purpose.'
Hermione responds, condemning his insult, telling him of the lack of praise sh...
... middle of paper ...
...sinister individual - a man taking pleasure in his own jealousy. Camillo responds loyally; `I could do this...' The sly nature of Leontes is accentuated in his final words before he leaves the scene;
`I will seem friendly, as thou hast advis'd me.'
This leaves the viewer with an unnerving tone to the rest of the act, a vision of the schemings of Leontes, as Camillo and Polixenes conclude the scene.
Throughout the first act, the viewer's opinion of Leontes has been corrupted. We have seen the demise of Leontes' sanity, a rise in a sinister attitude, culminating in his plot to kill Polixenes. The act has revealed an intensely paranoid figure, a poignantly insecure character, a man taking pleasure in his envy of Polixenes' relationship with his wife.
Bibliography:
Shakespeare's Language, Russel
Shakespeare's Life, Bussey
English Review, June 2002
The older gent in Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, namely Polonius, is no type character. Rather he is quite rounded and complex. This essay will explore his character.
All throughout the Roman comedy Cleostrata’s power over her husband Lysidamus and her ability to embarrass him is painfully obvious. In the beginning of Act II, when Cleostrata is going to visit Myrrhina her slave Pardalisca informs her that Lysidamus wants lunch ready for when he returns home. Cleostrata’s responded “I will not get things ready, and not a thing shall be cooked this day, either … I’ll punish him, the gallant – with hunger, thirst, hard words, hard treatment, - oh, I’ll punish him” (Casina, 150-155). Clearly, Cleostrata accurately illustrates the type of “unmastered creature” Marcus Porcius Cato
If we look at chapter three, Leonce comes home in the middle of the night, awakening his wife whom is fast asleep. He immediately beings to give her the details of his day. When she is unable to fully reply, because she is half asleep, he becomes upset. He states that she is the sole object of his existence and he is upset that she takes so little interest in his concerns. If she was indeed the sole object of his existence, he would have been more considerate than to awaken her in the middle of the night, because he wanted to talk.
It is often said that characters who are in constant conflict are different in nature. Although this is often true, it does not apply to William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, as characters who are very similar to each other are also involved in constant conflict. While some may argue that Hamlet and Laertes have distinct differences, it is evident that there are noticeable similarities between them. These similarities are evident when looking at their deep love for Ophelia, their desire to leave Denmark, and their domineering attitude towards females throughout the play.
Oakes, Elizabeth. A. "Polonius, the Man behind the Arras: A Jungian Study. " New Essays on Hamlet.
This paper contains 237 words of teacher’s comments. What one perceives is influenced by one’s environment. The setting and commentary surrounding events changes our perception of them. Any innocent gesture can be perceived in the wrong way with enough persuading from someone else. Even if someone has total faith in another person's innocence, they can be persuaded to doubt them through the twisting of events. Once just a small amount of doubt has been planted, it influences the way everything else is seen. This occurs throughout the play, Othello. In this play, Iago influences Othello's perception of events through speeches and lies, making him doubt Desdemona's fidelity. Iago uses his talent of manipulating events to exact his revenge on Othello. Iago's twisting of events in Othello's mind leads to the downfall of Othello as planned, but because he fails to twist Emilia's perception as well, he facilitates his own eventual downfall.
Othello avoids all irrelevancies and the action moves swiftly from the first scene to the denouement. We never get lost in a multiplicity of incidents or a multitude of characters. Our attention remains centered on the arch villainy of Iago and his plot to plant in Othello’s mind a corroding belief in his wife’s faithlessness. (viii)
Rosenberg, Marvin. “Laertes: An Impulsive but Earnest Young Aristocrat.” Readings on Hamlet. Ed. Don Nardo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1999. Rpt. from The Masks of Hamlet. Newark, NJ: Univ. of Delaware P., 1992.
Does Hamlet stand alone? Does this magnate of English literature hold any bond of fellowship with those around him, or does he forge through his quandaries of indecision, inaction and retribution in solitude? Though the young Dane interacts with Shakespeare's entire slate of characters, most of his discourse lies beneath a cloud of sarcasm, double meaning and contempt. As each member of Claudius' royal court offers their thickly veiled and highly motivated speech Hamlet retreats further and further into the muddled depths of his conflict-stricken mind. Death by a father, betrayal by a mother, scorn by a lover and abhorrence by an uncle leave the hero with no place to turn, perhaps creating a sense of isolation painful enough to push him towards the brink of madness.
Jones, Eldred. "Othello- An Interpretation" Critical Essays on Shakespeare’s Othello. Ed. Anthony G. Barthelemy Pub. Macmillan New York, NY 1994.
Although many arguments could take place over the blame of Othello’s fate, the one murderer no one doubts is jealousy. Although Othello’s insecurities and “blindness” along with one of the most duplicitous villains in all of literature definitely catalyze the deaths at the conclusion of the play, in the end Othello must suffer the consequences manipulated or not. Despite the number of uninteresting characters in the play, Othello, the Moor of Venice contains one of the most intricate characters in any of Shakespeare’s plays, and will be discussed and intensely argued forever.
First introduced through conversation with her brother, Ophelia is asserted as a love interest of Hamlets. Within the conversation, Laertes proposes hypocritical advice which she quickly replies to with witty retort: "Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,/ Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven;/ Whiles, like a puff 'd and reckless libertine,/ Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads,/ And recks not his own rede." (I. iii.). Her introduction instills both her friendly relationship with her brother, as well as her comical, original nature. It asserts her neither passive nor aggressive. Within the same setting shortly after, her father asserts a protective command over Ophelia. "I would not, in plain terms, from this time forth,/ Have you so slander any moment leisure,/ As to give words or talk with the Lord Hamlet./ Look to 't, I charge you: come your ways." (I. iii.). Being told to stay away from Hamlet to protect her honor as a woman, Ophelia accepts and complies; it is somewhat foolish yet primarily protective of her father, but also displays Ophelia 's attachment to family in respect and care.
Shakespeare’s Hamlet is arguably one of the best plays known to English literature. It presents the protagonist, Hamlet, and his increasingly complex path through self discovery. His character is of an abnormally complex nature, the likes of which not often found in plays, and many different theses have been put forward about Hamlet's dynamic disposition. One such thesis is that Hamlet is a young man with an identity crisis living in a world of conflicting values.
Both Laertes and Hamlet firmly associate themselves with their families. Laetres highly respects his father and loves him very much. Similarly Hamlets conveys this by comparing his father to “Hyperion” a sun god. “This visitation Is but to whet thy almost blunted purpose” They both share a strong but different love for Ophelia. Laertes departing of advice onto Ophelia concerning her relations with Hamlet can be explained as a wish for safety, emotions and virtue which he considers to be at threat by Hamlet, ”But you must fear, his greatness weighed, his will is not his own”. With Hamlet it can be clearly seen in the scene of Ophelia’s funeral where he declares his love for her and his distress of the departure of her soul, “forty thousand brothers could not with all their quantity of love make my sum!”. Just before this both Hamlet and Laertes jump in her grave for a scuffle, without even a consideration. This is also an example of the two characters rashness.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s behavior and actions cause readers to question his sanity. Hamlet’s character can be interpreted in many different ways. It could be said that he is indeed insane, or it can be disputed that he, as he made known, is simply putting on a good act. The complexity of knowing Hamlet’s true character derives from the fact that we, as readers, are unable to read Shakespeare’s or Hamlet’s minds. Therefore, judgments could be made solely by reading and interpreting his behavior and coming up with a satisfactory conclusion. Taking into consideration incidents such as Polonius’ murder and Hamlet’s contemplating suicide, it is natural for individuals who perform such acts to be categorized as crazy. Ignoring Hamlet’s actual actions, and paying keen attention to what altered his character, one can debate that Hamlet is not at all insane. It is important to consider the situations which triggered Hamlet’s different actions. By giving discreet thought to Hamlet’s position and what he endures, one will realize that he is not demented, but he is actually an angry, betrayed and emotionally devastated fatherless son.