More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of title the crucible
The crucible and modern times
Give the themes of the crucible by arthur miller
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Changes that John Proctor and Reverend Hale go Through as the Play Progresses
"The Crucible" symbolises the events in 1950's America when anyone who
was suspected of left wing views was accused of 'Un-American'
activities. "The Crucible" was Miller's inventive way to criticise the
paranoia surrounding a too conservative American government. After
appearing before the committee numerous times to defend himself of
suspected Communist activities, Miller used his pen the greatest
weapon to confront the silly attacks purposed upon him. This essay
will tell you the general background to the play? What the
similarities are between 1690's Salem witchcraft trials and 1950's
McCarthy America and most importantly how would Miller want an
audience to react to Proctor and Hale at the end of the play?
A crucible is a metal dish used to separate metals from its ore. A
compound of metals would be inserted from one end and from the other
end only the pure elements would come out, the remains would be poured
elsewhere. A crucible can be compared with a tough situation or as
life. When Proctor and Hale were put through the 'crucible' would they
come out pure or as useless remains?
"The Crucible" is a story of the events in 1692 Salem which led to the
mass hysteria where witchcraft trials would decide the fate of many
people. The play tells us about the events leading to 19 innocent
people being killed due to false accusations. There was a real powers
struggle at the time where the opinions or views of people with a
higher status would be considered where as if you were of a lower
status, were different or if you apposed to the status quo and yo...
... middle of paper ...
...owards him. Miller wants the
audience to accept proctor as being a good person overall. Proctor has
a deeper meaning that is shown in the play. Miller was called several
times before McCarthy's committee; possibly he resembles Proctor in a
way because of how he stood up for himself just like Proctor did. Hale
changed from being totally with the system to totally against the
system the audience will respect his decision for doing so and
acknowledge how hard this decision must have been at the time. These
two characters were astonishing characters in their own right and were
actually like normal people whilst most of the other characters were
caricatures. Miller wants the audience to realise how this is an
allegory of 1950's America, he wants the audience to realise that
these things are still happening in today's times.
appears to selfishly protect their own interests, they eventually become selfless and serve justice. Through the use of description, Miller illustrates how John Proctor, Reverend Hale and Giles Corey transform from selfish to selfless. In the town of Salem, Massachusetts, John Proctor is a reputable man who despite conceals his unspeakable crimes, transforms to counter the
and 4 employ a variety of dramatic techniques to engage the audience in the fate of John Proctor. Miller continually shifts the focus from character to character throughout the scenes, which as a result produces a strong overall effect in the play. The play was written in the early 1950's during a time when there was a lot of unnecessary hysteria in the United States surrounding Communism, and although the play is based on the Salem witch hunts of 1692 they're similar to what was happening in
Can People Change? “You must be the change you want to see in the world” - Gandhi is a quote that applies to The Crucible, as characters change a lot during the course of the play, whether it has to do with themselves or taking action and speaking out against what they think is wrong. In the world-renowned play, The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the question “Can People Change?” is answered when many characters, such as Elizabeth and John Proctor develop so much making them dynamic individuals
Role of John Proctor in Arthur Miller's The Crucible Arthur Miller wrote the play 'The Crucible' to show the historical parallel between the Salem witch trials of 1692 and the McCarthy 'witch' hunt of the late 1940' and 50's. The character John Proctor seems to represent and show the viewpoint of a real man, unaffected by hysteria; a difficult thing to portray during the 1950's in the USA, due to the fear and hate of Communism and the 'witch' hunt for communists. John Proctor is the
movements of the play. The Crucible is set against the backdrop of the mad hunts of the Salem witch trials in the late 17th century. It is about a town, after accusations from a few girls, which begins a mad hunt for witches that did not exist. Many towns’ people were hanged on charges for of witchcraft. Miller brings out the absurdity of the incident with the theme of truth and righteousness. The theme is conveyed through the struggles of Miller’s main character John Proctor. In The Crucible
Contrast Between Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor Create an outright contrast between the two protagonists – Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor. Examine how he has established this dichotomy of character, and what does it add to the dramatic quality and audience involvement in the play. The “Crucible” By Arthur Miller Miller attempts to create an outright contrast between the two protagonists – Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor. Examine how he has established this dichotomy