Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Development of the cold war
Communism and cold war thesis
Americas cold war policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Development of the cold war
In discussions of the causes of the Cold War, one controversial issue has been the question: who caused the Cold War? On the one hand, traditional historians argue that the leaders of the Soviet Union are to blame. On the other hand, revisionists contend that the Western leaders are to blame. Others even maintain that it was both the Western and the Soviet leaders who are equally responsible for the development of the Cold War. My own view is that the Western leaders were responsible for protecting democratic values that we enjoy today while the Soviet leadership’s ideology, aggressive and expansionist intrusions were mainly responsible for the development of the Cold War.
World War II had ended in 1945 leaving the Soviet Union in control of large areas of Eastern Europe, and the Western Allies in control of the West. While the Allies restored democracy in the West, the Soviets started turning the Red Army occupied countries into Soviet satellites controlled my Moscow. Unfortunately, the consolidation and threat of the communist regime, and Stalin’s threatening expansion in Eastern Europe led to distrust and suspicion. Tensions were heightened by the ideological differences between the two sides of the “iron curtain”.
On March 5, 1946, Winston Churchill delivered a speech at Westminister College in Fulton Missouri known as the "Iron Curtain." In his speech, he uncovered what he believed were the true intentions of the Soviet leadership. Hoping for a peaceful reconciliation with the Russians, Churchill said “We welcome Russia to her rightful place among the leading nations of the world.“ However, based on the events in Eastern Europe, he felt that the Soviet intentions were not only solely for security but rather expansion...
... middle of paper ...
...War, 1941-1947 (2000), (ch. 10: To the Truman Doctrine: Implementing the New Policy), 316-352. [electronic resource]
Charles S. Maier, ‘Hegemony and Autonomy within the Western Alliance’, in Melvyn P. Leffler and David S. Painter (eds.) The Origins of the Cold War. An International History (2002), 154-174. [electronic resource]
John Kent, ‘British Policy and the Origins of the Cold War’ in Melvyn P. Leffler and David S. Painter (eds.) The Origins of the Cold War. An International History (2002), 139-153. [electronic resource]
John Lewis Gaddis, We Now Know. Rethinking Cold War History (1997) (Esp. ch. 7: Ideology, Economics, and Alliance Solidarity), 189-220. [on reserve in the Rutherford Library]
Anne Deighton, ‘The 'Frozen Front': the Labour Government, the Division of Germany and the Origins of the Cold War, 1945-7’, International Affairs, 63 (1987), 449-465.
The alliance formed between the US and USSR during the second world war was not strong enough to overcome the decades of uneasiness which existed between the two ideologically polar opposite countries. With their German enemy defeated, the two emerging nuclear superpowers no longer had any common ground on which to base a political, economical, or any other type of relationship. Tensions ran high as the USSR sought to expand Soviet influence throughout Europe while the US and other Western European nations made their opposition to such actions well known. The Eastern countries already under Soviet rule yearned for their independence, while the Western countries were willing to go to great lengths to limit Soviet expansion. "Containment of 'world revolution' became the watchword of American foreign policy throughout the 1950s a...
Isaacs J (2008). ‘Cold War: For Forty-five Years the World Held its Breath’. Published by Abacus, 2008.
Gaddis, John Lewis. We Now Know: Rethinking the Cold War: Dividing the World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1997. Publishing.
1 Walter Lippman, The Cold War: A Study in U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1947) 48-52.
Discussions of the causes of the Cold War are often divisive, creating disparate ideological camps that focus the blame in different directions depending on the academic’s political disposition. One popular argument places the blame largely on the American people, whose emphasis on “strength over compromise” and their deployment of the atomic bomb in the Second World War’s Pacific theatre apparently functioned as two key catalysts to the conflict between US and Soviet powers. This revisionist approach minimizes Stalin’s forceful approach and history of violent leadership throughout World War 2, and focuses instead on President Harry Truman’s apparent insensitivity to “reasonable Soviet security anxieties” in his quest to impose “American interests on the world.” Revisionist historians depict President Truman as a “Cold War monger,” whose unjustified political use of the atomic bomb and ornery diplomatic style forced Russia into the Cold War to oppose the spread of a looming capitalist democratic monopoly. In reality, Truman’s responsibility for the Cold War and the atomic bomb drop should be minimized.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Gregory, Ross. A. Cold War America: 1946 to 1990. New York, NY: Facts on File, 2003. McQuaid, Kim.
Hammond, Thomas, Editor. Witnesses to the Origins of the Cold War. University of Washington Press. Seattle, 1982.
Glynn, Patrick. Closing Pandora's Box "Arms Races, Arms Control, and the History of the Cold War". New York: HarperCollinsPublishers, Inc. 1992.
Outline of Essay About the Origins of the Cold War OUTLINE: Introduction- 1. Definition of ‘Cold War’ and the Powers involved 2. Perceived definition of ‘start of Cold War’ 3. Iron Curtain Speech, Truman Doctrine and Berlin Blockade as significant events that caused strife between both powers, but which triggering off the start of the Cold War Body- 1. Iron Curtain Speech (1946) - A warning of Soviet influence beyond the acknowledged Eastern Europe - Churchill’s belief that the idea of a balance in power does not appeal to the Soviets - Wants Western democracies to stand together in prevention of further
"Nevertheless, like its predecessors, the Cold War has been a worldwide power contest in which one expanding power has threatened to make itself predominant, and in which other powers have banded together in a defensive coalition to frustrate it---as was the case before 1815, as was the case in 1914-1918 as was the case from 1939-1945" (Halle 9). From this power struggle, the Cold War erupted. In April 1945, Russian forces that had been triumphant at Stalingrad had pushed the German forces back into Germany and American and British forces that had been victorious in their invasion of Normandy did the same; they met at the Elbe River in central Germany (Lukacs 17). Europe was separated into two independent halves, one Russian occupied and the other American. From this division, the Cold War emerged.
Tomkinson, John L. (2008) The Cold War: Themes in Twentieth Century World History for the International Baccalaureate. 3rd edition. Athens: Anagnosis.
...E. The Cold War: The United States and the Soviet Union, 1917-1991. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.
Opalisime After World War II there was a strong anti-communist movement in America for decades prior to the 1950s. Nuclear weapons also sent a shot at distrust and fear between America and Russia. Information about nuclear weapons is very limited to the public. There are some facts, details, and reasons on why this war happened, the effects of the Cold War, and how society reacted to the War. It began in the 1945-1948 timeframe and ended in 1989, having been a dispute over the division of Europe.
Larres Klaus, Ann Lane. (2001) The Cold War: the essential readings. United Kingdom. Blackwell Publishers
The New Cold War. Great Britain: Bloomsbury Publishing. Weber, Smith, Allan, Collins, Morgan and Entshami. 2002. Foreign Policy in a Transformed World. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.