Analysis Of Edgar Allen Poe's The Cask Of Amontillado

1060 Words3 Pages

When someone wrongs you, do you do it after one major event or do you do it when the same event happens repeatedly, how do you justify vengeance? When trying to decode “Edgar Allen Poe’s” work you must realize his background is puzzling and that his work is intimate with many facets and niches in his life. “Edgar Allen Poe” is like Shakespeare in where he writes the same four stories but he writes them well and has earned his title and legacy, he obtained it by writing his stories around the characters with an excellent plot and setting while also using the point of view in a very nuanced way. The plot of “The Cask of Amontillado” is basic but does its job well, it is the story of the man the basic plot is that Fortunato and Montresor have had a long history of insulting each other, the conflict is usually one sided until Fortunato oversteps his boundaries and Montresor vows to get back at Fortunato. There is much
I interpret this story as a tale of a guy who took things too far and is way too happy with the results of his actions. With how the characters Montresor is too eager to send a man deep into the catacombs and kill a man, and the short path from point a to point b. With the last line of the story “In pace requiescat! (Poe 97)” that is how “Edgar Allen Poe wanted to end his story, with the narrator telling the audience that Fortunato rested in peace with nobody to disturb his resting ground. The setting helps the story in more ways in one, in where it helps nurture the characters’ motivations and helps set the atmosphere of light hearted carnival to dank, somber, dungeon. Symbolism is used well with some being literal like the clown costume and subtle with the echoes and the torch. This story is what defines “Edgar Allen Poe” as a well-established icon of the classical romantic

Open Document