The Call Of The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

674 Words2 Pages

Aengus wanted to find love by finding his glimmering girl. Spitz needed to remain as the lead dog or kill Buck to stay alive, and Buck needed to kill Spitz to overthrow his dictatorship. They were driven to stay alive, or find love.
Aengus was driven to find his glimmering girl so he could experience love. These ideas are shown in the passage as “I will find out where [his glimmering girl] has gone, And kiss her lips and take her hands; and walk among the dappled grass” (Yeats, 19-21). The author is expressing how Aengus searched for his glimmering girl so he could do what other couples who were in love could do. Sadly, Aengus was not successful because he wasted his life. This is expressed in the passage as “I am old with wandering” (Yeats, …show more content…

This is shown many times in the passage but one quote truly stands out which is, “Buck hated [Spitz] with a bitter and deathless hatred” (London, 27). This was because Spitz was a trickster and a deceiver, a ruthless dictator, and cunning. He hoodwinked the dogs and had no trouble killing one of them. This can be shown in the passage as “Spitz ran out his tongue and laughed again” (London, 27). Spitz laughed as the other wolfish and savage dogs annihilated Curly causing Buck to loathe him even more. Spitz had no shame or remorse after this, after all, he was a dog of the wild. Buck’s mission was successful for Spitz died and his dictatorship disappeared into oblivion. In the text, it does not clearly state that Spitz died, but it can be inferred from, “The dark circle became a dot on the moon-flooded snow as Spitz disappeared from view” (London, 67). This can be inferred that Buck did not kill Spitz but he was the one who caused Spitz to die. As a result of this Buck became a wild dog, a primordial beast never to go back to the sunny hills of the Santa Clara Valley. This is shown in the passage as, “the dominant primordial beast” (London, 67). This was what Buck had become not only when he killed Spitz but when John Thornton …show more content…

This is shown in the passage as, “[Spitz] divined in Buck a dangerous rival” (London, 44). He wanted this so he could stay alive, control others, and appear as the best. Spitz was unsuccessful because he died when Buck bested him. This is shown in the passage as, “Buck stood and looked on, the successful champion, the dominant primordial beast” (London, 67). This was when Buck had beat Spitz in their fight to the death. Spitz’s mission was an unnecessary one because he caused his owners pain and he was a bully to other dogs and as a result of this many dogs died or were injured and he died. This would not have happened if Spitz was not such a jerk or a

More about The Call Of The Wild Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document