On April 15, 2013, the people of Boston experienced a tragedy they never saw coming. The Boston Marathon attack was an attack against the American people and our nation as a whole. The emergency response teams from every conceivable organization used their resources to react as quickly as possible. What happened on the morning of April fifteenth will forever live in the memories of the American people and to those who responded quickly to the matter. As much as the city of Boston was prepared for the marathon, nobody could fathom an event like the bombings to take place. The government responded as quickly as possible, and I believe to the best of their ability. Not only that, but the Bostonians, the people of Boston, had a huge impact on the …show more content…
Having been present at many marathons in both Chicago and Boston, I can picture the atmosphere perfectly. The exhilaration and excitement coming from both athletes and bystanders as both parties prepared to embark on the day ahead of them. Whether it be families cheering on loved ones, strangers cheering on strangers, the feeling that is omitted at these types of races is one that can’t really be explained. So, as you can imagine, not many people were thinking that something as tragic as the bombings could possibly take place. In an article published by the New York Times, authors stated, “Two powerful bombs exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon on Monday afternoon, killing three people, including an eight-year-old child, and injuring more than one hundred,” (Eligon and Cooper, 2013). Many witnesses explained how the city of Boston went into complete pandemonium after the first bomb went off. “The F.B.I. took the lead role in the investigation on Monday night,” (Eligon and Cooper, 2013). At first, the bombings were described as a ‘criminal investigation that is a potential terrorist investigation’. At the time of the bombings, law enforcement officials did not have a suspect. After long hours of searching, officials identified the two brothers, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Tamerian Tsarnaev. From there, officals worked with the public and eventually found and detained one and killed the …show more content…
Richard Serino, a deputy administrator for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) U.S. Department of Homeland Security spoke before the U.S. Senate describing the ‘lessons learned from the Boston Marathon Bombings, focusing on the preparation and response to the attack itself. Throughout much of the discussion, Serino praised officials, police officers, and civilians who went out of their way to help those in need. He states ‘we must leverage all of the resources of our collective team at every level of government to prevent, prepare for, protect against, respond to, and recover from, all hazards’ (Serino, 2013, page 3). Within one of his paragraphs he speaks about FEMA and how the incident demonstrated how their approach helped empower the community. “Immediately following the event, FEMA, as part of the whole community, collaborated with our law enforcement, public safety and federal partners to provide expertise and were ready to help when the President issued a disaster declaration for the affected communities (Serino, 2013, page
Walzer is an esteemed retired professor from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Walzer has written many books, essays, and articles. His essay, Excusing Terror, is one that best relates to the current events happening around the world. In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism. In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets
chaplaincy. This profession, like all in the medical field, requires much heart, passion and personal connection when serving and caring for the patient. At Boston Medical Center, located in Boston’s historic south end, excellent health care was provided to a patient diagnosed with Systemic Lupus. Systemic Lupus is an autoimmune disease that attacks the cells and tissues of the body. With the help of Reverend Le Sette Wright, a licensed chaplain and the patient’s health care team, the patient was able
processes to reach their best moral decision. My purpose for this essay to show you how I reach the best ethical decision. I have selected five steps from several of the class readings that coincide with what I believe to be ethical and moral. I have used Baker’s model and his interpretation of Kidder’s model, Josephson’ Model and Patterson and Wilkins examples. That best works with my ethical and moral principles and me. By the end of this essay, you will be able to see my process and understand my reasons
Although exterminating a multiracial society is inhumane, many countries feel there are benefits to having a “pure society.” These extremist countries tend to perform socially and ethically unacceptable acts in order to enforce their personal opinions and beliefs on others. These “acts” are present in today’s society such as genocide and ethnic cleansing. For centuries there has been conflict between countries and not until after WWII was there anything official to neutralize the conflict: The United
research I have done for this essay as well as past projects or assignments due in this class. I think that the Death Penalty strikes me as a particularly important topic because there are two major sides to this issue and in the end it decides whether someone lives or dies. I think that the Death Penalty should only be used based on the seriousness or extent of the crime. On one hand if someone commits a crime such as murdering multiple people in events like the Boston Marathon, or Sandy Hook School shooting
national security. The liberty to have one's’ information protected from the government is important because humans can use information to exploit one another and negatively impact their lives. There have been many court cases over this topic. In this essay, I will address at least two stances on the issue: The NSA’s official standpoint, and the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) standpoint on the