The Black and White of Science and Religion

1658 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Creationism vs theory of evolution argumentative essay

Annotated References

Astley, J; & Francis, L. (2010) British Journal of Religious Education, Promoting positive

attitudes towards science and religion among sixth-form pupils: dealing with

scientism and creationism. Vol. 32 Issue 3.

The Routledge group writes a very compelling argument dealing with the attitudes towards science and religion. The authors have survey results from their research and supply the basic data learned. The paper data talks about the consistency of each institution and really points towards how group and subcultures can either be positive or negative based on how its presented.

Cho, F; & Squier, R. (2008). Journal of the American Academy of Religion, "He Blinded Me

With Science": Science Chauvinism in the Study of ReligionVol. 76 Issue 2.

The glaring word of chauvinism is brought up in this article of science and religion. The author brings in the disparity of that institution flex their muscle on their views. The article goes through the heaviness of history with this mindset and the problem of think through the constructions of theories with the stubbornness of one way is the only way. The article also goes through the illusions of naturalist and the tension of reductionism.

Dias, P. (2010). Academic Journal Science & Christian Belief, Is Science Very Different from

Religion? A Polanyian Perspective. Vol. 22 Issue 1.

The polanyian perspective is it reveals an aspect of reality, a reality largely hidden to us, and existing therefore independently of our knowing it. The author is demonstrating that science is not that much different that religion and that both have a faith type base. He explains that both sciences and religion have a dogmatic set of core commitments that ...

... middle of paper ...

.... (2010). Academic Journal Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, No Field Is an

Island: Fostering Collaboration between the Academic Study of Religion and the Sciences.

Vol. 22 Issue 2/3

Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2010). Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, Zygon and the Future of

Religion and-Science. Vol. 45 Issue 2.

Van Slyke, J. (2010). Academic Journal Theology & Science, Challenging the By-Product

Theory of Religion in the Cognitive Science of Religion. Vol. 8 Issue 2.

Walhout, M. (2010). Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, Looking to Charles Taylor and

Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Vol. 45 Issue 3.

Zeller, B. (2011). Academic Journal Church History, American Postwar “Big Religion”:

Reconceptualizing Twentieth-Century American Religion Using Big Science as a

Model. Vol. 80 Issue 2.

Show More
Related

  • Compare and Contrast of Stephen Jay Gould and Richard Dawkins´s Points of View on Science and Religion

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The lack of conflict between science and religion arises from a lack of overlap between their respective domains of professional expertise—science in the empirical constitution of the universe, and religion in the search for proper ethical values and the spiritual meaning of our lives. The attainment of wisdom in a full life requires extensive attention to both domains—for a great book tells us that the truth can make us free and that we will live in optimal harmony with our fellows when we learn to do justly, love mercy, and walk humbly.”

    Read More

  • Use Of Satire in Kurt Vonnegut's Cats Cradle

    1440 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wilson, Dr. Andrew. "The World's Religions and Their Scriptures." World Scripture. 1991. 15 November 2007.

    Read More

  • The Dead Sea Scrolls: An Enlightening Archaeological Discovery

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...es.” Encyclopedia of Religion. Ed. Lindsay Jones. 2nd ed. Vol. 4. New York: Macmilla Reference USA, 2005. 2845-8. Print.

    Read More

  • Personal Gods, Deism, & ther Limits of Skepticism

    3710 Words  | 8 Pages

    In order to continue our discussion of the legitimate philosophical, scientific, and religious aspects of the science and religion quagmire we need a frame of reference to guide us. What I present here is an elaboration on a classification scheme proposed by Michael Shermer. (5) Shermer suggests that there are three worldviews, or "models," that people can adopt when thinking about science and religion. According to the same worlds model there is only one reality and science and religion are two different ways of looking at it. Eventually both will converge on the same final answers, within the limited capabilities of human beings to actually pursue such fundamental questions. The conflicting worlds model asserts that there is only one reality (as the same world scenario also acknowledges) but that science and religion collide head on when it comes to the shape that reality takes. Either one or the other is correct, but not both (or possibly neither, as Immanuel Kant might have argued). In the separate worlds model science and religion are not only different kinds of human activities, but they pursue entirely separate goals. Asking about the similarities and differences between science and religion is the philosophical equivalent of comparing apples and oranges. "These are two such different things," Shermer told Sharon Begley in Newsweek's cover story "Science Finds God," "it would be like using baseball stats to prove a point in football."

    Read More

  • Psychology & Religion: The Spirtual Side to Counseling

    1111 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hood, R. W. Jr. (1999, November). American Psychology of Religion and the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

    Read More

  • Religion And Science : The Scarlet Letter

    1374 Words  | 3 Pages

    As said by Yale professor of psychology and cognitive science, "Religion and science will always clash." Science and religion are both avenues to explain how life came into existence. However, science uses evidence collected by people to explain the phenomenon while religion is usually based off a belief in a greater power which is responsible for the creation of life. The characters Arthur Dimmesdale and Roger Chillingworth in Nathaniel Hawthorne 's novel, The Scarlet Letter, represent religion and science, respectively, compared to the real world debate between science and religion. Roger Chillingworth is a physician who is associated with science. (ch. 9; page 107) "...made [Roger Chillingworth] extensively acquainted with the medical science of the day... Skillful men, of the medical and chirurgical profession, were of rare occurrence in the colony...They seldom... partook of the religious zeal that brought other emigrants across the Atlantic." The people of the Puritan community traveled across the Atlantic for religious reasons, and because men affiliated with medical science did not tend to practice religion, they rarely inhabited this community. Chillingworth, falling under the category of "skillful men of the medical and chirurgical profession," would not be expected to reside in this community. The narrator through emphasizes this with his rhetorical questioning, "Why, with such a rank in the learned world, had he come hither? What could he, whose sphere was in great cities, be seeking in the wilderness?" These questions demonstrate that it was so strange for Chillingworth to appear in this community because of his association with science. Perhaps, the phrase "with such rank in the learned world" could yield the narra...

    Read More

  • Religion: Christian Science

    1387 Words  | 3 Pages

    Christian Science is an idealistic and most radical form of transcendental religiosity. The study of Christian Science teaches a feeling of understanding of God's goodness and the differences between good and evil, life and death. The purpose of this paper is to address how the study of Christian Science helps us better understand the impact of globalization in America, as well as the impact of American on globalization. This paper is important because globalization features a dominant worldview. All throughout the world people believe, study and teach different types of religious movements that impact others. People need to better understand how certain religions modify, conflict with, and impact the world. First, it will discuss the life and work of the founder, Mary Baker Eddy. Secondly, it will examine the primary rituals and religious services of the Christian Science movement. Then, it will outline the precursors and history of the religion. In the conclusion, a response will be offered to the question of how Christian Science helps us better understand the impact of globalization on America and of America on globalization.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Religions of Christianity and Hinduism

    2515 Words  | 6 Pages

    Eastman, Roger. The Ways of Religion: An Introduction to the Major Traditions. Third Edition. Oxford University Press. N.Y. 1999

    Read More

  • Seven Dimensions of Religion in Buddhism

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    Smart, Ninian. "Blackboard, Religion 100." 6 March 2014. Seven Dimensions of Religion. Electronic Document. 6 March 2014.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Scientific Revolution

    1361 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...wever, in the best interest of advancing education and an enlightened society, science must be pursued outside of the realm of faith and religion. There are obvious faith-based and untestable aspects of religion, but to interfere and cross over into everyday affairs of knowledge should not occur in the informational age. This overbearing aspect of the Church’s influence was put in check with the scientific era, and the Scientific Revolution in a sense established the facet of logic in society, which allows us to not only live more efficiently, but intelligently as well. It should not take away from the faith aspect of religion, but serve to enhance it.

    Read More

  • The Integration of Science and Religion

    3264 Words  | 7 Pages

    At first glance, many facets of science and religion seem to be in direct conflict with each other. Because of this, I have generally kept them confined to separate spheres in my life. I have always thought that science is based on reason and cold, hard facts and is, therefore, objective. New ideas have to be proven many times by different people to be accepted by the wider scientific community, data and observations are taken with extreme precision, and through journal publications and papers, scientists are held accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work. All of these factors contributed to my view of science as objective and completely truthful. Religion, on the other hand, always seems fairly subjective. Each person has their own personal relationship with God, and even though people often worship as a larger community with common core beliefs, it is fine for one person’s understanding of the Bible and God to be different from another’s. Another reason that Christianity seems so subjective is that it is centered around God, but we cannot rationally prove that He actually exists (nor is obtaining this proof of great interest to most Christians). There are also more concrete clashes, such as Genesis versus the big bang theory, evolution versus creationism, and the finality of death versus the Resurrection that led me to separate science and religion in my life. Upon closer examination, though, many of these apparent differences between science and Christianity disappeared or could at least be reconciled. After studying them more in depth, science and Christianity both seem less rigid and inflexible. It is now clear that intertwined with the data, logic, and laws of scien...

    Read More

  • Sociological Perspectives on Religion

    994 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...Other fact is that, even though sociology and science have keep questioning about the existence of supernatural power, practice of one’s religion is still deeply rooted in the society. This proved that sociology and science does not influenced one’s faith. Moreover, sociology has a neutral role in religion because sociologists view religion as part of culture that need to be preserve the way it is not eliminated or changed. Therefore, it doesn’t try to undermine or strengthen one’s faith. In addition, scientists have also come to believe that supernatural power somehow exists in the society because they have invented equipment that is used to explain the supernatural phenomena. This means that science have been trying to adapt and accept that religion is an important study in science. Therefore, science and sociology have neutral role in influencing people’s faith.

    Read More

  • The Thinking about Nature throughout the Enlightenment

    633 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the ancient and medieval ages of Europe, people were trying to find out the truth about the nature by using only observation and reflecting on it. They did not use scientific methods, indeed it cannot be called as science; it was ‘natural philosophy’. However, through the enlightenment this began to change and it was converted to ‘science’ by creating a new methodology and reflection on nature. While this process, science that existed due to the enlightenment gradually differed from natural philosophy in terms of its relationship to religion. Briefly, natural philosophy which means the way of thinking about nature before the enlightenment was different from modern science of today in terms of the relationship to religion, it was completing the religion in contrast of modern science.

    Read More

  • The Relationship Between Science and Religion

    1381 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stenmark, Mickael. How to Relate Science and Religion. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2004.

    Read More

  • Hindu Mythology

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    Organ, Troy Wilson. Eerdmans' Handbook to The World Religions. Woodbury, NY: Barron's Educational Series, 1974. Print.

    Read More

More about The Black and White of Science and Religion

Open Document