James, C.L.R.. (1963) PDF article entitled “The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L’Ouverture and the Santo Domingo Revolution” claims that that former slaves in San Domingo were in conflict with white-complexioned slave owners, which in turn caused the French Revolution because of discord between former slaves, the wealthy and the French elites (pp.63-90).
The author support his/her/it thesis by claiming that the white-complexioned slave owners tried to seize the assets of mixed-race individuals through genocide, which in turn caused uproar in France over human rights of slaves in order to highlight that oppression can spark revolutions. The key repetition words are “negroes”, “mulattoes”, “white”, “colony”, “bureaucrats” and “revolution” while the binaries found are “white” versus “negro”, ‘bourgeoisie” versus “poor”, “justice” and “injustice” and ‘”liberty” versus “slavery”(pp 63-90). This means that the white complexioned people were placing African slaves into submission to work in the colonized lands in order to benefit the elite class, which in turn is a case of injustice for the slaves.
The chapter was composed because the author of the book aims to highlight about the history of the French revolution in order for readers to be educated over the implications of slavery, oppression and genocide and bring about the reasons why human rights play a vital role in the stability of society. This component is relevant to post-colonial studies, and it is still relevant to today because oppression of minorities and taking away their rights and freedoms for slavery still occur, although not used with that much force and violence. The chapter is most likely intended for students educated above Grade 10 to adults who are interested in histo...
... middle of paper ...
... civilizations were responsible for oppressing minorities and enforcing cruel misogyny on women through oppression (pp. 100-300). This implies that the author favours the scientific rationale of civilization and society because it restricts males from harmful activities.
The key repetition words are “science of man”, “moral” and “man”, while the binaries are “science” versus “religion”, “optimist” versus “pessimist”, “ignorant” versus “educated”, “past” versus “future” (p.190-43). This illustrates that there are debates on whether human nature thrives in a society built on science versus a society based in nature.
The author’s article is relevant to modern society because democracy is the foundation of political society, and whether modern democracy is upheld by human instinct or by a set of rules and regulations of the state remains a topic to be debated on.
Was the Terror of 1793/4 inherent from the revolutions outset or was it the product of exceptional circumstance?
Chapter six of “Reversing Sail: A History of the African Diaspora” is entitled “Asserting the Right to Be”. This chapter explores the rebellion of enslaved Africans and their descendants. It stresses that fact resistance against slavery and oppression have been present from the very beginning of the slavery and it has grown and evolved over time. One point in particular that the chapter discusses is the rise in the number of slave revolts in the early 1500’s. Another important topic that is discussed is the fact that people of African descent not only had to fight against slavery but they also had to fight the concept that an african ancestry was a mark of inferiority.
The slave insurrection began in August 1791 in Saint-Domingue. Though many conflicts flared in Martinique and Guadeloupe a few years prior, they were not as well coordinated and massive. Not expecting so many to come and attack at once, white planters were overwhelmed.
For years the European colonies in Latin America had made profit off the backs of slaves. They used them to harvest crops and produce goods for their economies. They had abused them and did not give them full equality as whites had in the colonies. By the 1770s, there are abolitionists who have been fighting for the rights of slaves, and many of them have seen or heard of the horrors of slavery. They work tirelessly to rid of the institution that many considered to be evil. However, many of these colonies do not feel that slavery should be ended, and they continued in their abuse of the slaves. Even before the 1700s, slaves have committed small acts of resistance in order to fight back against the injustices done to them. These acts however, did not gather as much attention as the future rebellions that would arise in the 1790s and the 1800s.When these rebellions did occur, such as the famous Haitian Revolution, and the fact that abolitionists have proved through testimonies and evidence that slavery was an evil institution, that many nations begin to reconsider whether or not slavery could be continued. In the case of France, they decided to give slaves in Haiti more rights partly due to the large scale of insurrections occurring on plantations. However, they still want to maintain control of Haiti. After Louverture had become the governor, later arrested, and the French failed to retake Haiti, they finally decided to leave the country alone, and take action against slavery. One example was how there was a law passed in 1818 which “declared that the captains of slave-trading vessels, if apprehended, would be deprived of their licenses and their cargoes would be liable to seizure”. Still the author does mention that the slave trades continue in secret. The Spanish as well as Brazil, who will continue slavery all the way up
The 18th century marked the onset or foundation of this epidemic, this disease which is ingrained in all of us. Slavery became endemic in many parts of the world, especially in Africa. It can be presumed that this movement to subdue this unknown kind to its own akin began the whole notion of racism and constructed these two parallel structures that discriminated purely on the basis of race, sex, class, color and national origin. The memory of having been capital -Africans who were bought and sold and traded lingers on in the present. The 19th century had shown development which further fueled this divide, where scientists subscribed to the belief that human population can be divided into races. With racism came the dismissal of one’s culture, tradition, beliefs, individuality, identity, their experience and beliefs. The slavery of blacks is a term that’s blotted with irreplaceable brutal history. Many
Just when the American Constitution was going into effect in 1789, a revolution broke out in France. Just like the Americans, the French also proclaimed that men are born and remain free and have equal rights. But did this apply to the slaves in France’s overseas colonies? Mainly I will discuss the role played by race in the Haitian Revolution in this paper. France did not possess many colonies in the New World. The three Caribbean colonies of Saint Domingue (today’s republic of Haiti), Guadeloupe, and Martinique contained almost as many slaves as the thirteen original American colonies. Race was a key factor in the decision of France to abolish slavery in all of
Until the early 1800’s, Spain created an empire that lasted around three hundred years and was considered “the most powerful country in Europe” (Mini Q). During the late 18th century, the Spanish colonies had an uncompromising social structure to which people were placed in different classes based on their heritage. The Creoles, people born in the colonies but of pure Spanish blood, lead the fight in the struggle for independence because of the economic and social conditions as well as the attempt to gain political power.
There was about 30,000 free persons of color in 1700s. Half of them were children of white freeman and slave women. The other group was the free persons of color were the slaves that bought or gained their freedom. There was 50,000 black slaves these slaves were also divided into two groups. The domestic slaves had about 100,000 in there group. These slaves worked as cooks, servants, and various artisans around the plantation or in town. The Haitian Revolution was a social and political change in the French colony of Saint-Domingue. Slaves
In making this argument this essay seeks to five things. Firstly, to define democracy within the contemporary context offering the key characteristics of a modern re...
The San Domingo revolution led to the abolition of slavery, independence of Haiti from France and the proclamation of a black republic. However, unlike many historians, CLR James in his work, The Black Jacobins, does not depict the struggle for independence as merely a slave revolt which happened to come after the French Revolution. He goes beyond providing only a recount of historical events and offers an intimate look at those who primarily precipitated the fall of French rule, namely the black slaves themselves. In doing so, James offers a perspective of black history which empowers the black people, for they are shown to actually have done something, and not merely be the subject of actions and attitudes of others.
In comparing the average citizen in a democratic nation, say the United States, to that of a non-democratic nation, for instance Egypt, it will be found that the citizen in the democratic nation is generally better off – free of persecution, free from fear of the authorities, and free to express his opinions on governmental matters. And while national conflicts occur everywhere, incidents like violent revolts have shown to be more prevalent in nations where citizens are not allowed to choose who governs them. It is slightly paradoxical that democracy, so inherently flawed in theory, can lead to such successful outcomes in practice. The question, then, becomes: “If democracy has so many weaknesses, why does it work?”
There have been enormous efforts to spread democracy as a political system throughout the world by the developed democratic countries and the international development organizations including the World Bank. By the late 1990s the United States alone spent over a half billion dollars to promote democratic expansion throughout the world (Diamond, 2003). These were done considering that the democratic system leads towards development. As a result in the late 20th century we saw a huge political transformation towards democracy. During the last few decades a huge number of countries adopted democracy as their political system. However, it retain a big question how far democracy is successful in bringing development of a country? At this stage, some people also criticizes the effort of democratization arguing that it is done without considering the context of a country, sometimes democracy is not ideal for all countries and it is an effort to extinct diversity of political system. In studying the literature regarding the debate, we found a paradoxical relationship between democracy and development. Some argue that democracy has failed to ensure expected outcomes in terms of development. While others confronted that democracy has a considerable impact on development. Another group of people argue that form of political system actually does not have any impact on development process. On the verge of these debates, some development institutions and academics throw light on why democracy is not working properly, and what measure should be taken to make it more successful in bringing effective development of developing countries. Consequently, this writing is an effort of revisiting the different views about impact of democra...
The French socially oppressed the people of Haiti. The French socially oppressed the people of Haiti and the slave they imported to the land to benefit from their services. Social oppression is a concept that describes a relationship of dominance and subordinat...
Throughout history different types of instrumental regimes have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and cohesive. As humanity advanced, governments obligingly followed. Although there have been hiccups from the ancient times to modern day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive. As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the populaces desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they deem appropriate and can denounce them once they no longer appease them. In this paper, the benefits of democracy are outlined, compared to autocratic communism, and finally the flaws of democracy are illustrated.
The foundation of the modern political system was laid in the times when the world was strangled in slavery. In those moments, enlightened minds in Greek came up with the new system that was there to remain for the next thousands of years. This system, now known as democracy, is a form of government in which supreme power is vested to the people themselves. People have the right to elect their leaders directly or indirectly through a scheme of representation usually involving periodically held free elections. A new democratic government is usually established after every 4-5 years, and it is trusted with the responsibility to cater to the needs of all the people irrespective of the fact that they voted for them or not. Although the minorities may not be very pleased with the idea of democracy, however, a democratic government is certainly the best because it establishes social equality among people, reduces the conflicts in the state to a minimum, gives the chance to vote repeatedly, and creates patriotism.