Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Moral heroes in literature
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the thriller short story “The Birds”, by du Maurier, there are many characters and events that occur to separate this story from almost any other story. By examining his characterization, morality, and functions, it becomes clear that du Maurier is characterizing Nat as a hero that takes danger and unexpectedness in a straightforward manner to reveal the certain skill and mindset needed in order to survive in the position that Nat is in.
Nat Hocken is one of the essential characters in the short story. He is presented to the reader as a solitary man, sitting down and watching the birds fly around and over the sea. He is also presented as having been in the war, the story stating that he was working on the farm part time, “... because of
…show more content…
He is very resistant to fear, as he dealt with the birds very calmly and even when he was being attacked or was about to be attacked, he stuck to his mindset and carried out whatever he had planned to do. Using that information and details from many other instances, the reader can infer that Nat will put his family and their protection in front of everything when they are in trouble or need him at all. After the first attack, instead of thinking of it as bad luck, “...He got up and started to work on the kitchen windows…” (10) Nat is also described and inferred to enjoy nature (at least until he was by the birds) and “sitting on the cliff’s edge, he’d watch the birds.” (1) Using all of du Maurier’s indirect characterization, the reader can learn much about Nat’s personality and how he would think and react to certain …show more content…
After the birds attack Nat and his family the first time, Nat tries to warn all of his neighbors that they could potentially be in danger. Nat, realizing he and his family could be in danger, as well, boards up the windows, blocks the doors and does anything that would help keep his family safe. Nat’s character is shown most effectively when he is invited by Mr. Trigg to go shooting with several of his neighbors and instead of going decides to “...get along home…” (15) This shows the conflict in Nat and how his choices affect the story. With the choice of going with his neighbors and having some “fun” after a stressful day and terrifying previous night, he once again chooses to stay with his family and keep them safe. This moral constitution of Nat makes him a very powerful and resistant character to the reader and the characters in the book
Doug Swieteck, from “Okay for Now”, by Gary D. Schmidt, lived a life in anger. At the beginning of the book, he was very hateful of everything. He had spent a long time in anger and disgust, trying to find a way in life. Near the beginning of the book, Joe Pepitone gave Doug his baseball cap and jacket in person, to Doug. But, Doug’s mean older brother took the cap and his dad took his jacket. That added to Doug’s anger even more. But, luckily he turned it around in the middle and end of the book. He ended being a lot happier and was able to control his emotions better.
ultimately defends the wild in all of its forms. He opens the novel with a narrative story about a
The story explains that mongooses are curious, so Rikki spent his time exploring everything in the house. When exploring outside, Rikki meets a bird that explains to him that one of his babies fell out of the nest and was eaten by Nag, the cobra. That night, Rikki overhears the cobras’ plans to kill the family, so that Rikki would leave and they could take over the garden. Nag sleeps in the bathroom overnight, planning to kill Teddy’s dad in the morning; Rikki attacks him, causing the father to wake up and shoot Nag, saving the family. Rikki also helps save the family by distracting Nag’s widow, Nagaina, as she was about to attack, eventually killing her as well. The family was very thankful, as he had saved all of their lives.
The play “A Raisin in the Sun” by Lorraine Hansberry has many interesting characters. In my opinion, the most fascinating character is Ruth because of her many emotions and captivating personality. She goes through extreme emotions in the play such as happiness, sadness, anger, stress, and confusion. Ruth is very independent, firm, kind, witty, and loving.
In the play A Raisin in the Sun, by Lorraine Hansberry (1959), the author depicts an African American family whom struggles with the agonizing inferiority present during the 1950s. Hansberry illustrates the constant discrimination that colored people, as a whole, endured in communities across the nation. Mama, who is the family’s foundation, is the driving force behind the family on the search for a better life. With the family living in extreme poverty, their family bond is crucial in order to withstand the repression. Hansberry effectively portrays the racism within society, and how it reinforced unity amongst the family members.
The cast of animals that Wilbur meets in the farm serves as a collective word of advice of sorts. Although the advice that they offer isn’t always correct, such as when the goose suggests that Wilbur run wild and wreak havoc (page 17), they appear to be well-meaning and benign all things considered. They are also very fond of gossip, which is demonstrated by the rapid spread of the news of Wilbur’s escape (page 19). However, while most of them are kind-hearted, there is a singular nasty exception. This exception is a rat named Templeton, who is as self-serving and inconsiderate as they come. He blatantly expresses this by straightforwardly and rudely telling Wilbur that he will eat the latter’s food because he “hasn’t got sense enough” to eat
The first words of the book convey a parrot that spoke “a language which nobody understood”, and Edna’s husband “had the privilege of quitting [the parrot] when [it] ceased to be entertaining” (11). In the same light, Edna speaks of and wishes for a life that nobody apprehends. Her husband also possesses the moral, objectifying liberty to quiet Edna when she did not provide leisure, as one can turn off a song once it grows into a tedious nuisance. A further exemplification comes about when Old Monsieur Farival, a man, “insisted upon having [a] bird. . . consigned to regions of darkness” due to its shrieking outside (42). As a repercussion, the parrot “offered no more interruption to the entertainment” (42). The recurrence of the parrot evolves Edna’s state of stagnance as a consequence of being put to a halt by others despite her endeavor of breaking free. Ultimately, as Edna edges out towards the water to her death, a bird is depicted with “a broken wing” and is “beating the air above, reeling, fluttering, circling disabled down, down to the water” (159). This recurrence parallels the beaten bird to a suffering Edna. She has “despondency [that] came upon her there in the wakeful night” that never alleviates (159). Dejection is put to action when Edna wanders out into the water, “the shore. . . far behind her” (159). Motif of birds articulates her suicide by its association with
How can people be so similar and different at the same time? In the novel The Pigman by Paul Zindel both the protagonists John and Lorraine have different characteristics.John and Lorraine are both best friends who are sophomores in high school. Although they are very close friends they have different personalities.At the beginning of the Novel, John is more of a troublesome kid whereas Lorraine is calm, sensitive and compassionate.Overall the novel The Pigman by Paul Zindel demonstrate how different good friends can be.
In a time where the general population is overweight and obsessed with technology, there isn’t much time for the outside world. A Walk in the Woods by Bill Bryson is about two corpulent men on a journey to walk the Appalachian Trail. At first their tale seems unlikely because of their weight and the fact that they have never hiked a day in their lives. However, it quickly turns into an inspiring story that we, as people, should use to spark our own adventure in the great unknown. Bryson writes A Walk in the Woods to encourage people to live a little and experience the great outdoors, to meet interesting people in it, and to encounter the enthralling wildlife that resides on the Appalachian Trail.
Who was once a hero, was now the villain in many regards; he was the protagonist at first, and after, became the antagonist after his fortune took over his morality. Henry Ford had well-meaning intentions at first. Truly wanting to connect the world, he wanted to create a car that everyone can afford and be able to enjoy. Although he achieved his goal of creating this car, the model T, several unintentional controversial ideologies were established along with it.
The creature’s personality, or actions toward society, was displayed as being very calm and compassionate in the novel. He made many attempts to converse with society, but society feared and mistreated...
If he would walk into a room and see people laughing he would walk up and punch whoever was laughing right in the gut. 75% of the time this was a justified course of action for nick. At the same time if there’s one thing Nack loved it was to make people laugh, he was always doodling small little comics. At lunch, on brakes at work, even in the in the bathroom. Every Friday he would set up a small table by the entrance of the school and sell his comics for 50 cents and every Friday the principal would tell him he couldn’t sell his doodles on school grounds, so he moved his stand right outside of the main building. Seth had purchased on of the comics once and found it very perplexing it was titled “ghost jokes” and below the title were three panels all of which were blank. Nack would usually sit right outside the main building, even in the snow, from seven to eight in the morning before packing
Tragedy struck Holcomb, Kansas on November 15th, 1959, with the lost of four members of the Clutter family, who were well known in their town. “Of all the people in the world, the Clutters were the least likely to be murdered,” (Capote 85) was what one townsperson said about the widely known family. Their lives were taken by two men named, Richard (Dick) Hickock and Perry Smith. After months of fleeing, Dick and Perry were captured. Over the next couple of years they were through numerous hearings and questioning over the murder they committed. Then the day came where some believed that vengeance was served. Hickock and Smith were both executed by hanging just after midnight on April 14, 1965. Dick and Perry 's mental health was widely discussed
Even when Jim is in this awful war-stricken place, one thing that he can still find comfort in, and which reminds him of his peaceful home is the birds, which are everywhere, still living their lives unaffected by mans war. This shows how nature is unaltered by mans cruel antics against other man, and how life and nature must, and will go on through all circumstances.
Authors’ Steven Crane and Jack London are known for their stories using naturalism, the struggle between man and nature. Naturalism is like realism, but it explores the forces of nature, heredity, and the environment on human beings, who are faced with the forces of nature. Both “The Open Boat” and “To Build a Fire” demonstrate how inferior and small humans’ really are to nature. Humans cannot control nature or determine its outcome. In both stories nature is the antagonist constantly challenging the humans’ ability to survive. I chose the topic over naturalistic elements because I enjoyed reading these stories. Both stories have a strong since of naturalism in it and both authors’ are known for naturalistic features existing in their writings. In this paper I will give you more of an insight to what naturalism is and what naturalistic elements are present in the two stories listed above.