Therefore, inspiration refers to the supernatural influence of the Holy Spirit upon the authors of the Bible. These sacred writings, while involve man as an agent, are not based on human initiative. In fact, the prophetic accuracy of Scripture confirms divine initiative because “prophecy never had its origin ... ... middle of paper ... ...s subjective. While negating inerrancy does not directly link individuals and institutions to abandon clearly orthodox matters of doctrine, numerous cases support the argument. Many who have denied inerrancy have stepped into greater theological errors.
One of the major themes of Hodge’s work is that the Protestants believe that God is the inspiration for scriptures. The Protestants also believe that scripture tells us exactly what we need to know. The introduction to the text defines us three things that Protestants believes. The first is that they believe that Scriptures are the word of god and were written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, secondly the scriptures contain supernatural revelations about God, and lastly the scriptures can be understood by the people without an interpreter or mediator. The next part of the text focuses on the Protestant view on canonization.
It can easily be seen that Christianity is a religion based on falsehoods and has many intrinsic flaws. They are seen by the fact that the followers of this religion do not conduct themselves in the manner proscribed by their most holy texts. These errors reside in the facts that these same texts are contradictory, and that their very god cannot possibly exist. These errors and omissions are then covered by a vague concept: faith. Work Cited The New Oxford Annotated Bible: With the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, New Revised Standard Version.
There is little evidence that Jesus' appearance cleared anything up or gave us God directly. Wittgenstein, who wanted our language to be clear, knows well enough that neither the Hebrew nor the Christian God's words could fall within his constructed linguistic net. They would always come from outside, from "the mystical." Thus, where our clarified language is concerned, "never the twain shall meet." Then, was Jesus really a proto-Wittgenstein?
So, if I am going to say that this is God’s work, I better be absolutely sure and ready to defend it. This is a difficult task in this day and age. The Bible is not the only book that claims to be the Word of God. We have the Book of Mormon; the Avesta; the Talmud; the Qur'an; the Bhagavad Gita, all claiming to be the spiritual words of us being joined to some sort of God. So here in lies the problem with these books, these sayings, these words; they all contradict one another.
This is a logical fallacy because if the bible is known for its good stories and its good fables, but most of the book contains things that are frowned upon by god himself. In conclusion, Paine makes a good argument that the bible is wrong and the stories in it don’t make a lot of sense. He makes a god point about his religion being his mind and not what a book has to say or what preachers have to talk about to further the word of god. For me I grew up in a catholic family, went to catholic schools, and go to church every Sunday. These points make sense but I cant agree with Paine one hundred percent on this one.
In relation to the other canonical books of the Old Testament, the book of Esther of the Hebrew version contains unique theological figure, which involves the removal of the name of God and the direct absences of various important religious elements essential to a Jewish or Hebrew religious writings. The book of Esther is never referred to either in the New Testament nor the Dead Sea Scrolls, neither did the early church fathers rarely even referred to it in their writings. The book of Esther seems to be “anthropocentric,” and other than fasting there does not seem to any references or any implied points to the religious perspectives on God, Law, covenants and many other important themes that play central role in the Bible as a whole. Due to the lack or deliberate omission of God and various other religious references from the book, scholars have approached and viewed the book as doubtful and question the validity and the canonicity of the book. The book is supposed to contain some theological references and objectives therefore the book is understood by Biblical scholars in light of the commencement of the festival of Purim.
So the fact that Jesus was not crucified for our sins in the Quran makes Christian doctrines meaningless. Even though both are sacred texts for different religions, both believe in the existence of Jesus. Yet the contradictions of the events of the Crucifixion and Resurrection pose many complications to who the person of Jesus actually was. Due to these complications, some of the beliefs that the people of both these religions hold to be true are put into
It is widely accepted through the theological study of the Bible that the gathering and the selection of information included in the final compilation was an extensive and controversial process. Specifically, the events and movements that were influential in the recognition of the canonical books. According to Britannica, the canonical books are recognized as the quintessential corner stone of the New Testament, which also means that they are a foundational part of the current beliefs and practices of most of today’s Christians. Even more important is the process, culmination, and the compilations of events that lead to what Christians currently accept as the Word of God. There are several key historical references that were influential and these references are imperative to understanding the full context of the canonical books and their relevance to the Christian faith.
The Bible itself provides a binding of old teachings and principles that can be used even to this day. It is true that the Bible holds and teaches fundamental basis and principles in some of the most practiced religions, but incorporating a whole religious faith with politics and government is not of good intention. With the Bible, one can read of stories and traditions that can be used for reference, for knowledge, humor, and even fun. However, a religion is full of traditions, respective cultures and is different to each being that it takes part in it. Each person in some form or fashion incorporates what they value into decision-making, but the uproar is caused when one enforces it upon one another.