The Benefits Of Locavorism

836 Words2 Pages

Is living a lifestyle of locavorism really that plausible of an option? Is it really possible to find all the foods wanted in a diet in a local area. What’s the definition of a “local” area? Finding all the food I need within a say 100 mile radius would be impossible. I don’t know of too many jalapeno farms in Indiana, and living without jalapenos is not living. Living in Indiana alleviates some of this hardship, but I can only imagine the difficulties a locavore in New York City would face in such a populated city. Locavores claim to be living a healthier lifestyle, but if all necessary proteins and vitamins are not attainable in locally grown foods, and that is all locavores eat, then they must not be living as healthy as they think. Locavorism is also a much more costly way of life, and more harmful to the environment.
The first problem with locavorism is the definition of the word itself, what does it mean to eat locally.
The price ratio of shipping 2,000 apples 2,000 miles is the same as shipping 50 apples 50 miles (Source C), which leads many locavores astray. They tend to look at the miles the food travelled, not the “apples per gallon” (Source C) of the shipment. Also the shipment of 2,000 apples will be able to provide for more people than the shipment of 50 apples, thus making the shipment more valuable from a logical standpoint. Changing lifestyles to conform to locavorism also has a negative effect on the food suppliers overseas previously bought from, as they may depend on that person's business (Source C). foods with a ‘farm fresh’, ‘locally grown’, or ‘organic’ label on them also cost more in most cases, preying on the buyers want for local foods. While locavores may be trying to help the economy, they are really just hurting farmers that they previously bought from, and saying that being a locavore is saving someone money is outlandishly

Open Document