Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
difference between organic and Non organic food production
What's the difference between organic and conventional farming
What's the difference between organic and conventional farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Scientists work around the clock trying to improve daily living. Lab grown meat has yet to hit the market but is without a doubt going to be in our near future. It is said to be healthier than traditional meat and better for the environment. Lab grown meat does offer plenty of significant advantages over traditional meat but never would be able to overcome the ick factor. Lab grown meat will be able to cut down on a few resource costs that traditional meat can not. Animals take up a great deal of farmable land, food that could be used for human consumption, and drinkable water. “Livestock in the US consume more than 7 times as much grain as the American population—enough grain to feed about 840 million people” (Stone, Maddie). When scientists …show more content…
“The beef, pork, and poultry grown by Memphis Meats provides all the same nutrients and flavor as the meat you get from the supermarket, but without all the unnecessary consequences of the contemporary livestock rearing process” (Manoogian, Jack). If meat is being made in a lab it is less likely for greenhouse gases to occur and for bacteria to form on the meat. Greenhouse gases would be less likely to occur since lab grown meat is produced by cells being joined together and with traditional meat the animal would be alive for some time and produce waste which releases gases. Also, bacteria are less likely to occur since it would be made in a more sterile environment and labs are able to control the process and what goes into the meat when creating it. Such as heme iron, which is most commonly found in meat and can cause breast cancer. Yet, lab grown meat such as beef and pork can be made free of heme iron. Regular meat has an abundance of saturated fat, but this too can be reduced in a lab. Although, if scientists were to remove all of those things the grown meat would become very unappealing. It would become yellowish, the texture would be different, and it would lose its juiciness. But, if they do not remove the fat or heme iron the meat will look and taste similar to traditional meat. Being grown in a lab there is room for many unhealthy aspects to be …show more content…
It is not being made directly from a living animal since they are extracting cells from a donor animal and people are very skeptical about the method. The process is taking muscle cells, combining them together and growing it until they have something that looks similar to meat. “The regulatory situation gets more complicated with cell-cultured meat, in which cells taken from animal muscle are grown on special scaffolds until they form enough tissue strands (about 20,000) to make a meatball or hamburger. It is not quite animal, not exactly a food additive—yet intended as food” (Devitt, Elizabeth). When with traditional meat the animal lives and breathes and when it becomes the required size it is slaughtered and taken to be processed for eating. “How natural is it to raise thousands of animals, pump them full of drugs and run them through death machines to get that filet mignon you love?” (Manoogian, Jack). The way animals are killed today for eating is very inhumane, but many people suppress the knowledge they have since it would make eating a burger less appealing. People may never want to give up eating traditional meat since that is what they are used to. The meat made from cells is very tough and does not have the same quality as livestock. Livestock can move around and cells can not, so the lab grown meat becomes very stiff. Individuals eat McDonald
“U.S. Meat Production,” PSR, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Washington, D.C. 2014. Print. Web 1 Apr. 2014.
... flesh are then ground into a paste-like matter, which is cleansed with the previously mentioned ammonia to rid it of E. coli. The meat filler product is purchased by many fast food restaurants, such as McDonald’s. The Beef Products executive predicts that his product will be in 100% of hamburgers within the next five years.
Factory farming began in the 1920s soon after the discovery of vitamins A and D. Shirley Leung said, when these vitamins are added to feed, animals no longer require exercise and sunlight for growth (B2). This allowed large numbers of animals to be raised indoors year-round. The greatest problem that was faced in raising these animals indoors was the spread of disease, which was fought against in the 1940s with the development of antibiotics. Farmers found they could increase productivity and reduce the operating costs by using machines and assembly-line techniques. Unfortunately, this trend of mass production has resulted in incredible pain and suffering for the animals. Animals today raised on factory farms have had their genes manipulated and pumped full of antibiotics, hormones, and other chemicals to encourage high productivity. In the fast food industry, animals are not considered animals at all; “they are food producing machines” (BBC). They are confined to small cages with metal bars, ammonia-filled air and artificial lighting or no lighting at all. They are subjected to horrible mutilations: beak searing, tail docking, ear cutting and castration. The worst thing is that ...
Factory farming is a necessary component of our modern food production and supply system. In 2005, the U.S. produced 45.7 billion pounds of red meat. It efficiently produces and distributes huge quantities of food to feed the growing population of America. But the overfeeding of antibiotics in the U.S. meat industry has gotten to the extreme and it calls for a drastic change in order to prevent a potential public health crises.
At the turn of the new century, activists begun to protest the morality of animal experimentation: “… such methodology is far too cruel on beast, it cannot better mankind, but its lead to it demise…” Despite the rising concern for animal safety in laboratory research, federal legislations approved the practice. According to the federal bureaucrats, it is an essential tool to improve our current medical knowledge. Hence, most of the tested animals have a relatively shorter life span than human. Thus, it allows to test long-term disease in a smaller timeframe. Nonetheless, animal enthusiast request the banishment of animal experimentation in laboratory. Ergo, with our current technology, researchers are capable to reproduce the same result
Why do you eat a burger? The flavor? Lab Meat is meat made from a cell in a cow. It is suppose to completely better than the traditional way of growing of cows. Traditional way is actually better than lab-produced meat. Traditional way is better for you health. The traditional way is also cheaper than lab meat. The traditional way has more variety along with it is better for the environment. So let's see how the traditional way is better in detail.
food companies are selling products that require more preparation and more human-like ingredients (Byron, 2014). Specialized consumer demand is leading to an increase in product quality with some products being of “human food grade ingredients” (Byron, 2014). Thus there is an increase in the general cost for production of pet food including the supply of premium food ingredients, enhanced additives for increased health benefits, methods of purification and decontamination as well as costs associated with creating a more human appearance and smell. Furthermore, “protein is the most expensive macronutrient in both economic and ecological terms, it is arguably the nutrient requiring the most attention as it pertains to sustainability” (Swanson, Carter, Yount, Aretz, & Buff, 2013). The high level of expense needed in order to use protein as a supply leads, given the high nutritional value and demand, leads to ethical challenges described in more detail in the “Ethical and Social Responsibilities”
Animals are getting experimented on for products. Animals are getting affected everyday by this problem. They are getting experimented on to see if a product is safe for human beings to use. Medical schools in the United States have stopped using animals for their needs in training.(Driscoll and Finley) In 1983, 150 baboons had to be removed from the University of Pennsylvania Head Injury Clinic for brain damage. (Driscoll and Finley) People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and the Animal Liberation Front removed the baboons from the clinic. (Driscoll and Finley) The results of the experiments are not even that accurate. Nutrition experiments on animals are very inaccurate. PCRM published the article “An Examination of Animal Experiments” that stated “Nutrition is another area where animal experiments have raised repeated problems. While it is easy to feed vitamins, fat, or fiber to animals and to check whether their disease rates rise or fall, the relevance to humans is limited at best, due to major physiological differences between species.” People and organizations, such as PETA and the Humane Society of the United States(HSUS), have been...
Many people use the meat that they have harvested while hunting as a main food source for themselves and their families. One could argue that is easier to just buy store bought meat. While it is easier to buy meat from a store, it’s cheaper and healthier to hunt your own meat. In his article, J. Townsend talks about store bought meat vs. hunting
In price, cultured meat is cheaper. In 2010, the simple high in total savings was $243,240. (N. Fiala) This doesn’t seem like much but the first “steak” was made in 2003 at Harvard University. In 2008, PETA offered a $1 million prize to the first company to bring lab-grown chicken meat to consumers by 2012.(Levine) It is projected that in the years 2010-2020 the savings will jump to $2,432,400.(N. Fiala) This jump is just because the growth of the cultured meat. In the prediction for 2010-2030 the savings would be $4,864,800 and 2010-2040 estimated to be $7,297,200. (N. Fiala) This is a huge saving in just the production in meat. There is a down side to cultured meat. If they were to go with in vitro meat the farmer that raise the cows for the conventional meat would lose their jobs. This would cost the government to pay for them until they find a new job. Also, if you think that the prices for the lab equipment is high and the supplies need for synthetic meat, but the prices for livestock are almost as high. They have to pay for the feed for the animals and the time and space for them to roam. If they do not treat them right and pay for these things the right way, they could be...
The testing of animals is rising from pharmaceutical and cosmetic companies because the companies are spending billions of dollars on animals testing in order to make products safer to humans. Test animals are also treated poorly and, because of how they are treated, the animals begin to act differently. The substances cosmetics companies inject into animals are very harmful and torturous to animals, so most animals end up dying or being severely handicapped from then on. Most of the findings and conclusions from animal experimentation do not end up working the same way with humans. Enormous amounts of money are spent on animal testing each year when there are better ways to put the investments for better benefit for our country. Advancements in technology should be used to speed up and improve the process of developing cures for humans instead of continuing to torture innocent creatures. Although animal testing is still being used, the European Union has banned it completely. There are many alternative ways that are in the process of being made but ultimately we need an alternative method that bans animal testing completely.
Every year, humans kill over 56 billion farm animals, with 3,000 animals dying every second in the slaughterhouse around the world. In the United States, there are about 12.7 million people being diagnosed with cancer; eating red meats might be linked. Not only is the growth of the meat industry hurting the health of Americans, but also negatively affects the climate. As a society, we should be more educated about the food we eat and how it affects our bodies.
In the book Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer, the author talks about, not only vegetarianism, but reveals to us what actually occurs in the factory farming system. The issue circulating in this book is whether to eat meat or not to eat meat. Foer, however, never tries to convert his reader to become vegetarians but rather to inform them with information so they can respond with better judgment. Eating meat has been a thing that majority of us engage in without question. Which is why among other reasons Foer feels compelled to share his findings about where our meat come from. Throughout the book, he gives vivid accounts of the dreadful conditions factory farmed animals endure on a daily basis. For this reason Foer urges us to take a stand against factory farming, and if we must eat meat then we must adapt humane agricultural methods for meat production.
An abundance of Americans have no idea that most of the food that they consume are either processed or altered in one way or another. “Almost all beef cattle entering feedlots in the United States are given hormone implants to promote faster growth. The first product used for this purpose is DES (diethylstilbestrol) it was approved for use in beef cattle in 1954. An estimated two-thirds of the nation's beef cattle were treated with DES in 1956. (Swan, Liu, Overstreet, Brazil, and Skakkebaek)” Many people enjoy the various meats that comes from a cow, but that would probably change if the consumers knew that cattle is one of the most processed meat source in the market today because of the synthetic hormones that the cows are given. “ The three synthetic hormones are the estrogen compound zeranol, the androgen trenbolone acetate, and progestin melengestrol acetate. (Swan, Liu, Overstreet, B...
Bhat, Z.f., and Hina Bhat. "Animal-free Meat Biofabrication." American Journal of Food Technology 6.6 (2011): 441-59. Print.