The Belief In A Just World Analysis

464 Words1 Page

#4. Is Increasing Economic Inequality a Serious Problem? Yes, it is a serious problem according to Stiglitz, who believes that inequality affects the economy, and the democratic system. On the other hand, Rector and Sheffield argue that poor people are richer than people think (page 93). Furthermore, poor people have the same items that were meant for the middle-class, and most of the poor is never hungry. There is a huge gap between the rich and the poor in the United States. This alone proves that the inequality in the world is simply unjustified. According to Malahy, Rubinlicht, and Kaiser (2009), “the Belief in a Just World (BJW) is the notion that people get what they deserve and deserve what they get.” For instance, if a person dropped …show more content…

Rector and Sheffield must have been wealthy all their lives, because they have no idea what they are talking about. From my perspective, I disagree, with the fact that items where designated for the middle-class to purchase and not the poor. Who in the world allowed them to even put this crap in a book? What makes them think that the middle-class is so much better the poor? Poor people are allowed to have nice things too! Just because you are poor don’t mean you are homeless and hungry all the time. A person’s income is what classifies an individual as poor in the United States. If your income is below poverty level, you are indeed poor, depending on how many dependents you may have. Furthermore, people do not have an option to be poor. Many of us were born into poverty and that’s all we know. In fact, being lazy has nothing to do with it. The rich white people are the reason why people are poor. I assumed the authors forgot about slavery and unskilled labor that made them rich; as of today, they are living a prosperous life because of Native Americans, Blacks, and Latinos hard work for at least 400

Open Document