More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies symbolism
Critical analysis of William Golding's Lord of the Flies
Lord of the flies symbolism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies symbolism
William Golding includes many messages in his book “Lord of the Flies”. One of the hidden topics he mainly focuses on throughout the text, is that of man’s inner beast. As a dispute begins to cultivate among the boys and they split off into separate groups, the boys begin to lose their sense of humanity. Piggy questions “What are we? Humans? Or animals? Or savages?” (Golding 79). This is an indication that the boys are losing sanity and their inner beast is starting to reveal itself. When Simon is alone in the jungle, the lord of the flies comes to him in the form of the pigs head. The pig’s head says to Simon that “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!
Simon, the wisest, calmest, and maturest of all the boys, is off by himself “talking” to a pig, perhaps going crazy. All others are sitting around the fire relaxing, ignoring the fact that one of the the wisest men of all has himself begun to lose sanity, possibly symbolic of the condition of people on the island. Of course, readers know, by the description of the bulging clouds, that the sky will soon break and, symbolically, something terrible within the plot will soon happen. Indeed, the entire novel has built to this point, as readers have observed the downward spiral of morality amidst the moral characters and increased savagery. Simon has observed this, and perhaps because he tends to take in everything inwardly, his depression over the gradual decline in the children on the island has caused him to become somewhat senile. Simon continues his “conversation” with the pig whom he calls “the lord of the flies” (“Beelzebub” in Hebrew, meaning “the devil”), and it is as if he is being tempted by the devil, or corrupt immorality that has taken over the other children on the island. However, he is able to be triumphant over the temptations, and staggers back down to the island to inform the other children that the beast on the island is
All of the boys but Simon are becoming the beast at that moment. In Lord of the Flies, Golding proves that fear draws out man’s inner evil and barbarism. Within the novel, Golding uses characterization of the boys and symbolism of the beast to show the gradual change from their initial civility to savagery and inhumanity. Learned civility, order and humanity become ultimately futile in the face of fear. The author teaches that without logic, fear consumes us endlessly.
Lord of the flies dramatizes the conflict between the civilisation and savagery that exists in all human beings. Every choice that the author makes is designed to emphasize the struggle between the order of society, which includes morality, order, law and culture and chaotic elements of humanity’s savage instincts, which include anarchy, bloodlust, the desire for power, amorality, selfishness and violence. As the story progresses we see the swift fall of civilisation and the rise of savagery which is a key motif of this dystopian novel. One of the main characters, Piggy is used to present many allegorical messages such as injustice in society. However as savagery becomes more intense in the novel, Piggy is defenceless and weak so begins to suffer more injustices and eventually
“Everybody has good and evil within them. All we're trying to say is that people are not all good or all bad. People are more complicated than you think, and one has to be more knowledgeable about the complexities.” This quotation from Stephen Schwartz establishes that even the best of people can be bitter by their own nature. In the novel, Lord of the Flies, William Golding removes the restraints of society to prove that it is human nature to live primitively and that evil lies within all of us. The sanctions of society begin to deteriorate due to the loss of communication, Jack’s obsession with hunting, and the inhumane nature of Jack and his “tribe”.
When Simon goes to the pig, Simon starts hallucinating and thinks the pig is speaking to him. Meanwhile the hunters are naked, painted and people are losing their identity. Groupthink is again happening because everyone is starting to think that it would be fun to be a savage. The Lord of the Flies says to Simon that everyone is gonna become savage and kill him. Simon loses consciousness, but then later wakes up and he realizes he needs to tell everyone that there is no beast. When Simon gets to where everyone is, the savages all crowd around Simon and start chanting. Simon screams out about there being no beast but this is what happened “the beast struggled forward, broke the ring and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt onto the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (Golding 153). This is groupthink because everyone becomes a savage and attacks Simon. This is tremendously negative as they just murdered someone just from
The Beast (aka The Beast of War) is about a Soviet T-62 tank lost in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1981. The movie was released in 1988. It was based on a William Mastrosimone play entitled Nanawatai. It was directed by Kevin Reynolds, who later directed Waterworld. It starred George Dzundza, Jason Patric, Steven Baldwin. A Soviet tank unit in Afghanistan helps "clear out" a village, destroying it. One of the tanks, led by a ruthless Commander Daskal, orders the crushing of a captured prisoner under their treads of the tank. Leaving the village, Daskal's tank is separated from its unit and is soon lost. Mujahadeen warriors, led by the murdered prisoner's brother Taj, discover the lost tank and see an opportunity to take revenge. Knowing that the tank is in a valley with only one exit, they begin following its tracks, intending to use a captured RPG to attack it. Some women from the village also follow along with captured grenades in hand. The tank crew is made up of four Soviets and one Afghani. As night falls and the crew sets up camp, the Afghan tank crewman Samad teaches the tank driver, Konstantin Koverchenko, about the fundamental principles of Pashtunwali, the Pashtun people's code of honor: melmastia (hospitality), badal (revenge), and nanawatai, which requires even an enemy to be given sanctuary if he asks. We then see that Commander Daskal, called "Tank Boy" during the Great Patriotic War for destroying a number of German tanks in the Battle of Stalingrad, is not ruthless only to the enemy, but also to his men. He despises Samad and kills him on the pretext of suspecting him a traitor. After Konstantin threatens to report Daskal for the killing, Daskal orders the other two crew members to tie Konstantin to a rock, with a grenade to serve as booby-trap for the Mujahadeen. Some wild dogs come upon him and as Konstantin tries to kick at them, the grenade rolls down the rock and explodes, killing a dog but leaving Konstantin unhurt. The sound, however, draws the group of Afghani women. They begin to stone him and are soon joined by the mujahadeen. Konstantin is saved when he remembers Samad's lesson about "nanawatai," sanctuary. He calls out the word and the mujahadeen are obligated to take him with them. Camping out in a cave, they feed him and ask him to fix the broken RPG.
One of the most important and most obvious symbols in Lord of the Flies is the object that gives the novel its name, the pig's head. Golding's description of the slaughtered animal's head on a spear is very graphic and even frightening. The pig's head is depicted as "dim-eyed, grinning faintly, blood blackening between the teeth," and the "obscene thing" is covered with a "black blob of flies" that "tickled under his nostrils" (William Golding, Lord of the Flies, New York, Putnam Publishing Group, 1954, p. 137, 138). As a result of this detailed, striking image, the reader becomes aware of the great evil and darkness represented by the Lord of the Flies, and when Simon begins to converse with the seemingly inanimate, devil-like object, the source of that wickedness is revealed. Even though the conversation may be entirely a hallucination, Simon learns that the beast, which has long since frightened the other boys on the island, is not an external force. In fact, the head of the slain pig tells him, "Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill! Ö You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you?" (p. 143). That is to say, the evil, epitomized by the pig's head, that is causing the boys' island society to decline is that which is inherently present within man. At the end of this scene, the immense evil represented by this powerful symbol can once again be seen as Simon faints after looking into the wide mouth of the pig and seeing "blackness within, a blackness that spread" (p. 144).
As Simon was trying to tell the boys that the beast did not exist, his death symbolises that mankind can’t face the truth about their inner desires. Part of Golding’s intent was to demonstrate that the evil is not recognised in specific populations or situations. On the island, the beast is manifest in the deadly tribal dances, war paint and manhunt; in the outside world, the same lust for power and control plays out as a nuclear war. Throughout ‘The Lord of the Flies’ Golding has managed to show that evil is present in everyone.
Notably, when they killed the sow that became the lord of the flies they stabbed her “right up her ass!” (135). They treat killing the pig with the brutality of rape. This unsettling imagery shows how truly far from innocent the boys are . Also, when they kill the sow they “leave part of her for” the beast (137). The savage idea of leaving a severed head on a stick shows how the boys have become corrupted by the evils of the island. The fear of the beast has twisted them and made them crazy and brutal. Then the boys declare “this head is for the beast, it is a gift” (139). Their fear of the beast makes the boys frantic to appease what they believe to be the eminent danger of the beast. They throw aside their innocence as they sacrifice a severed pig's head to the beast. Clearly, the lord of the flies show the savage nature of the boys.
In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, Simon and Piggy are among a group of boys who become stranded on a deserted island. Left without any adults, the boys attempt to create an orderly society. However, as the novel progresses, the boys struggle to sustain civility. Slowly, Jack and his hunters begin to lose sight of being rescued and start to act more savagely, especially as fears about a beast on the island spread. As the conflict progresses, Jack and Ralph battle for power. The boys’ struggle with the physical obstacles of the island leads them to face a new unexpected challenge: human nature. One of the boys, Simon, soon discovers that the “beast” appears not to be something physical, but a flaw within all humans
Hook fails to display this interaction and instead shows brief shots of Simon staring at the pig’s head. “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast....Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!...You knew, didn’t you? I’m part of you? Close, close, close! I’m the reason why it’s no go? Why things are the way they are?” (158). In the novel, Golding goes into details about Simon and his interaction with the pig’s head, which he sees as ‘The Lord of the Flies’; who identifies itself as the beast and acknowledges that the beast exists within all human beings. In a previous chapter, we are told that Simon suggests that the beast is only the boys themselves, therefore this sign is crucial in confirming that his theory is correct. Since this scene is omitted from the movie, Simon’s theory cannot serve as foreshadowing. Simon is the first character to see the beast as a component of human nature. In the movie, Simon’s encounter with the head is quickly dismissed. We only see the camera focused on Simon staring at the pig’s head intensely. Since we do not see or hear the conversation between The Lord of the Flies and Simon, we are unable to make the connection leading to Simon’s death. In the novel, when the conversation takes place we know that Simon has gained knowledge that the beast is within every human, and he wants to share this with the rest of the boys. However, in the movie we simply see him staring at the pig’s head until the scene changes and shows Simon discovering the pilot’s body in a cave. He wants to share with the rest of the boys that there is no ‘beastie’ and that the beast is simply the dead pilot. The only similarity shared between the novel and the movie is the scene where Simon is returning to the boys, and he is mistaken for the beast and murdered. As their belief in the beast
William Shakespeare once said, “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” Despite whatever personal philosophies one might hold, this quote holds true in The Lord of the Flies. When the ensemble of boys crashes on the deserted island, established society is effectively removed from their lives. Once society is removed, the boys fall prey to the so-called “beast,” that is, their own murderous impulses. The true victim of the beast, however, is Simon, who is the first boy murdered on the island. William Golding uses Simon to represent pure goodness and morality to advance the theme that without societal constraints, man’s true nature is revealed.
Lord of the Flies, awarded the Nobel Prize for literature is considered a modern classic.
On contrary from all the other boys on the island Simon, a Christ like figure in the novel, did not fear the ‘beastie’ or the unknown. “Maybe there is a beast....maybe it's only us” Simon explained. (p. 97) The fear of the unknown in the novel contributes to the boys’ terror of the beast, the beast is an imaginary figure which lays in all of the boys’ minds and haunts them. Golding uses the beast as a symbol of the evil that exists in every creature. "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are the way they are?" The sow head announced to Simon to be the “lord of the flies”. The “lord of the flies” is a figure of the devil, and brings out all the evil and fear in people. It wants you to fear it, but if you don’t believe in the “lord of the flies” nothing can happen to you. Therefore Simon didn’t fall into the trap, but the beast killed him, meaning the other boys on the island did. Simon discovered that the beast is in fact just a dead parachute man before he died and ran down to tell the boys about his finding. When Sim...
When detached from civilization, human nature instinctively shifts from domestic to savage behavior. In William Golding’s novel Lord of the Flies, savagery supplants civilization. The novel is set during World War Two on an uninhabited island, an ideal incubator for this return to primitive behavior. The story follows a group of boys who have arrived on the island because of a plane crash. Automatically, two boys, Ralph and Jack, emerge as leaders. Ralph is chosen as the chief of the group and assigns Jack as a hunter. Piggy is a boy on the island who automatically shows his superior knowledge and is the first to meet Ralph. Another boy, Simon, enters the novel as a very timid and sensitive character who does not say much at the beginning, but increases his speaking throughout the novel. Piggy has a very present intellectual