The Basis of Framing A case study of how Framing within Politics uses the mechanisms by which information spreads among people

1319 Words3 Pages

1. The loophole of communication
The only step ahead that humans have, in comparison to animals, is communication. Of which the basis can be found in cooperation. Our desire to help one and other without personal gain in the short term is what sets us apart from animals, proclaims Tomasello. He states that communication can be divided into three groups, namely; requesting, informing and sharing. But these three function of communication only work when the common ground between human communicators is solid. “Indeed, this is what motivates them in the first place−they both assume mutually that it will be to their individual and mutual benefit to do so” (Tomasello, 2010). Thus, when the speaker wishes to tell something he makes sure that the receivers is aware of his attempt to communicate and the possible benefits that will follow.
But who benefits the most? Taillard states communication is a two-fold. “To the audience, it is a means of acquiring relevant information; to the communicator, it is a means of affecting the beliefs and other attitudes of the audience” (2004). Because of this the speaker has the possibility to give false, coloured or partial information, which means that the information may not beneficial for the receivers. Nevertheless, the information will be obtained by the audience.
This is because to obtain information concerning several subjects in life is essential. Due to limited time is it impossible to experience everything firsthand. Communication is therefore often “a more efficient means than direct perception, sometimes the only means, to obtain relevant information” (Taillard, 2004). Thus, we need the two functions, informing and sharing, to learn about life and therefore thrust the speaker based upon ou...

... middle of paper ...

...he possibility of deception” (Taillard, 2004). For the receiver cannot blindly take what the speaker says as factual information. Nor can the speaker be sure if his utterances have the intended effect. The speaker does have the opportunity of using persuasive tactics to enlarge the chances of successfully deceiving the receivers.
One of these persuasive tactics that makes it possible for the speaker to influence the receiver in the hopes of changing their habits or perceptions is framing. The receiver will seek “relevant information to form her own beliefs; [...] by using such information and the associated beliefs to form intentions to engage in self-beneficial, or adaptive, behaviour” (Taillard, 2004). The thrust that we have that the information is valid and given upon a cooperate basis, makes it possible for the speaker to manipulate the audience.

More about The Basis of Framing A case study of how Framing within Politics uses the mechanisms by which information spreads among people

Open Document