Introduction
In The Development of Environmental Regimes: Chemicals, Wastes, and Climate Change, the authors provide a simple framework to analyze the development of global environmental regimes (GER) which ultimately addresses why states sometimes agree to cooperate on global environmental issues despite divergent interests. The chapter is divided into five subsections but begins with an introduction to explain the five processes involved in the development of GERs. The authors address questions such as who forms GERs and how are they formulated. Next, they apply the processes involved in the development of GERs to four case studies that are linked to global environmental issues: ozone depletion, hazardous waste, toxic chemicals, and climate change, respectively.
The Paris Climate Change Conference is set to begin on November 30, 2015 and end December 11, 2015. At the Conference there is hope to build a “Paris Climate Alliance” that will negotiate a universal agreement, require each country to present its national contributions, help finance developing countries “towards low carbon resilient economies” and “strengthen the commitments of civil society and nongovernmental stakeholders” (“COP 21…”). Hopefully, the conference will provide an opportunity for all the countries in attendance to come together to from a new international agreement for the climate. However, in order for this agreement to be successful, it must first be applicable to all countries and be able to adapt to the specifications of each country. The agreement must also be sustainable, must have a balance between modification and adaptation, and must be ambitious to send the “necessary signals to launch the transition to a low-carbon economy” (“COP 21…”). This conference is extremely important as this issue continues to grow exponentially. There is a “variance between commitment and action [which] remains an obstacle to the development of a comprehensive solution” (“Global Climate…”). If an international agreement on the climate was established, each country would be held
The Copenhagen Accord allows global nations to contribute to the goal of having cleaner, safer and cooler living environment and planet. The Copenhagen Accord also requires all parties such as the US, UN, China, India, South Africa, Brazil and other countries to submit their individual emission reduction goals. These records will be classified by the two appendices attached to the agreement: the Annex I Parties and the Non-Annex I parties. The Annex I Parties will require submission on emission reduction objective for 2020. While the Non-Annex I parties will submit their individual plans for specifying their plan to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.
Global temperatures have noticeably been rising since the mid 1800’s.The average temperature has increased by 0.6 ± 0.2°C since 1860 according to (John Sweeney, 2003)with accelerated warming apparent in the latter decades of the 20th century. The legitimacy of global warming had long been debated, however in a report by (IPCC, 2007) it states that warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea level. Simulations on models such as EC-Earth provide us with predictions for future climate change. Depending on levels of emissions an increase of 1 to 5.5 degrees celsius is expected in average global temperatures by 2100.
Overall, climate change is a major issue that demands increased global attention. So far, the United Nations has set some regulations for factories and other industries for all nations to follow. One example would be, “All countries and nations would have to start cutting emissions of greenhouse gasses by January of 2015.” The role of the United Nations today for addressing climate change is to set these regulations to help improve conditions for low-lying countries. However, a way to further resolve the issue is to continue to develop smarter regulations, find ways to enforce these regulations, and to make sure that the countries have the resources to implement these regulations. These steps taken by the United Nations will greatly help improve greenhouse gas levels throughout the world.
In regard to mitigation, the United States proposes that each party of the new agreement define the nature of its contribution to the global effort to limit and/or reduce greenhouse emissions. In other words, contributions should be nationally determined by each party, taking into account national circumstances, capabilities, mitigation opportunities, and level of development. Contributions should be specific and clear. To ensure that schedules are easily understood, all parties should include accompanying information such as a time frame, base year, sectors covered, the percentage of national emissions covered and the overall emissions reductions anticipated. Contributions should be quantitative, or quantifiable. Parties should be required to regularly report their progress of implementing their schedules. Reporting should be based on a single system, but should acknowledge the presence of built-in flexibility given the nature of each parties circumstance and c...
The Kyoto Protocol was created to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that are affecting Earth. The project is extremely expensive and lacks effectiveness. The protocol may benefit the world in the far future, but it is not worth a country going poor. Also, if tackling the issue involves the cooperation of our entire earth, developing countries should not be excluded. The Kyoto Protocol raises many concerns, and if something is going to impact our economy so greatly, it should not raise any concerns and should be foolproof. In order to demonstrate the lack of effectiveness, the economic consequences must first be discussed.
This paper examines the Kyoto Protocol and the United States position on their participation in the Kyoto Protocol. To understand the underpinnings of the Kyoto Protocol one must agree that our planet is warming, and we (its citizens) are contributing to its warming. Any general argument about global warming has to address at least the following five questions:
... international talks not only help these countries gain more experience, but also enable them to adapt better to global warming.
Thesis: As the environment encounters damage from increasing levels of carbon dioxide, actions on both governmental and individual levels need to be implemented in order to protect the welfare of future life.