The Argument Of The Death Penalty

814 Words2 Pages

Death Penalty Argument
The Death Penalty was founded in 1990 and is still in use today, but only about 3/5 of the United States utilize this brutal punishment today, the rest has executed this penalty. The Death penalty should be abolished because it is inhumane, it is particularly expensive, and could put innocent people at risk.
First, the death penalty should be abolished because it is inhumane to execute someone no matter what he or she has done. One reason it’s inhumane is because lethal injection causes excruciating pain and takes up a protracted amount of time. Three drugs are used in lethal injection. To induce unconsciousness, sodium thiopental is used. To cause muscle paralysis and respiratory arrest, pancuronium bromide is used. The last in stopping the heart, potassium chloride is used. Another reason is because of the amount of time, within seven minutes after the first injection, death is pronounced. The entire procedure can last up to two hours, which is what happened to Christopher Newton in 1999. Christopher died at 11:53 a.m. at the age of 37. The last reason is because this punishment gives no one a chance for change. Executing a man for murder doesn’t seem like the ideal disciplinary action. Those that agree with capital punishment would …show more content…

They would say the cost is worth ridding our world of criminals, and they probably aren’t innocent, but that’s inhumane itself. No mercy is shown for the innocent because no one cares. The truth is, it is inhuman, expensive, and risky to serve this type of “Justice”, and it’s not worth it. Capital Punishment should be abolished in every state, and in every country. If we try to rid our world of these criminals with execution, that would make you a criminal as well. No longer having this penalty, will bring us more justice than any execution ever

Open Document