Healthcare in a Bundle People getting taxed on their hard earned money may be going to people who need it or to those who do not. The Healthcare reform law is not a reasonable solution for people who cannot afford or do not have private health insurance. The healthcare reform law has been the center of a heated debate for some time now within the House and the Senate. The Obama administration has been pushing healthcare reform since its beginnings in 2008 and has finally pushed the law through Congress. This was a difficult process simply because some of the members of Congress wanted the Supreme Court to judge if the healthcare law was constitutional. The Supreme Court however did not side with these members of Congress. They ruled that it was constitutional as long as it was applied as a tax. The Republicans have still heavily opposed the law eventually leading to the government shutdown in early and mid October of 2013. The big issue is that Democrats believe that the bill that they pushed through Congress will help people with pre-existing conditions such as diabetes. They also believe in the long run it will benefit the United States as a whole. The Republicans however believe that the bill is destroying jobs, raising taxes, and increasing the cost of healthcare in general ("Repeal and Replace the Job-Destroying Health Care Law - A Pledge to America"). Some Alexander 2 people also believe it may hurt jobs in the medical field in the future and it may affect doctor's incomes now. On the other hand, everyone can accept that the healthcare reform law will indeed benefit people with pre-existing illnesses such as diabetes. The law will help them get health insurance that before they would not have even been considered for, ... ... middle of paper ... ...insurance and people who cannot afford it; have much more evidence. There are many consequences for this healthcare reform law it may hurt states rights even more in the future, it may affect future jobs in the medical field, and it may be abused by people and not be able to help the people who need it most. The key reasons why the healthcare reform Alexander 5 law is not a reasonable solution because it limits states rights, leaves doctors with an uncertain future, and it allows people to abuse the system and use up other people's hard earned money. Works Cited Moffit, Robert E. "Health Care Reform Law Limits States from Making Health Care Decisions."Health Care Legislation. 14 Oct. 2013: n. pag. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 4 Oct. 2013 "Repeal and Replace the Job-Destroying Health Care Law - A Pledge to America" GOP. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Nov. 2013.
Moncrieff, A. R. (2013). The Individual Mandate as HealthCare Regulation: What the Obama Administration Should Have Said in NFIB Sebelius. America Journal of Law & Medicine,39, 539-572.
...ll have to provide nutrition facts to help communities as a whole become healthy or continue their healthy habits. This means the economy will have fewer people covered by government-sponsored health plans. The amount of coverage required to cover all the uninsured will not be enough. According to Daniel Fisher (2012), the laws that were in place provided coverage for the poor, elderly and even about 60% of Americans who get their insurance through their employer. The sole purpose for the healthcare reform is to fix a problem that each year costs extreme amounts of money. The Healthcare reform act is to help with the economic issue of people merely staying at their jobs just so they can continue with insurance coverage. The rising cost and the complexity of healthcare systems is an imperative factor that should concern both businesses and individual
Senator Scott Brown a Republican from Massachusetts stated that: “States shouldn 't be forced by the federal government to adopt a one-size-fits-all health care plan; each state 's health care needs are different”. Senator Brown has a very good point, the ACA healthcare program does not fit the differentiating needs of the different states, and each state has different factors that go into the roles of their healthcare programs. Thomas Miller, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute also has opposing viewpoints toward the relationship between the Affordable Care Act and state healthcare programs. “Miller says the ACA will undermine the development of free-market dynamics in the health insurance field and force states to accede to federal dictates. At first, he says, states may be able to shape their own insurance exchanges through which people purchase health coverage. But that is simply because Washington made certain “concessions” to the states to induce them to back the law, he says. Once the new health regime is deeply rooted, he predicts, “the long-term dynamics will very much have Washington in control rather than having open markets.”” (Clemmitt, Assessing the New Health Care
There is an ongoing debate on the topic of how to fix the health care system in America. Some believe that there should be a Single Payer system that ensures all health care costs are covered by the government, and the people that want a Public Option system believe that there should be no government interference with paying for individual’s health care costs. In 1993, President Bill Clinton introduced the Health Security Act. Its goal was to provide universal health care for America. There was a lot of controversy throughout the nation whether this Act was going in the right direction, and in 1994, the Act died. Since then there have been multiple other attempts to fix the health care situation, but those attempts have not succeeded. The Affordable Care Act was passed in the senate on December 24, 2009, and passed in the house on March 21, 2010. President Obama signed it into law on March 23 (Obamacare Facts). This indeed was a step forward to end the debate about health care, and began to establish the middle ground for people in America. In order for America to stay on track to rebuild the health care system, we need to keep going in the same direction and expand our horizons by keeping and adding on to the Affordable Care Act so every citizen is content.
When the Affordable Care Act was put into place President Obama promised that it would not be a tax but it had 5 different taxes related to it. These were a total of $494 billion of taxes for
These provisions “prohibit insurance companies from denying coverage to those with such conditions or charging unhealthy individuals higher premiums than healthy individuals” (National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius). The plaintiff’s second argument, however, states that government does not take into consideration the healthy individuals who choose not to purchase insurance. This argument is formed on the political premise that since health care costs are too much of a strain, it is easier for a healthy individual to live without health care coverage than to bear the burden of its cost. The reform will ultimately force healthy individuals to pay for premiums that will be higher than their actual health care expenses. It would also increase premium costs overall by accepting unhealthy individuals who cannot be charged the necessary rates to pay for their
Then president Trump took to twitter in announcing some optimism that the bill could be kept alive, and his disapproval over John McCain saying no. Not only are doctors, hospitals and health plans coming together to keep this act alive but on the other side conservative donors are coming in to make sure it's destroyed. They warned republicans that their contributions would disappear if the government didn't change the tax code or repeal Obamacare. The bill some say looks to be designed to fail, for many states would lose money rather than gain money. Legislation would set a limit on how much federal support states would receive, while the healthcare cost is rising more quickly than this limit. If this bill does happen to go through it could weaken the benefits and the protections of the consumers, allowing insurers to charge more money to sick people and take away basic guarantees such as maternity leave. Also getting rid of federal tax credits that make health insurance more affordable to low income families, the repeal would send the money to the states
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed by President Barack Obama is a significant change of the American healthcare system since insurance plans programs like Medicare and Medicaid (“Introduction to”). As a result, “It is also one of the most hotly contested, publicly maligned, and politically divisive pieces of legislation the country has ever seen” (“Introduction to”). The Affordable Care Act should be changed because it grants the government too much control over the citizen’s healthcare or the lack of individual freedom to choose affordable health insurance.
In the New York Times (Feb 4 2014), the issue of loss of jobs is well addressed with the Republicans stating that the Obama Care, will lead to major employers limiting their workforce so that they can minimize their contribution to the Care as a firm or a company. This can lead to great levels of joblessness despite there being a guarantee of universal health care.
Heath care is currently, and has been, a hot topic in politics and the average person's life today. Since Obama has come into office he has brought up the issue of providing every American with health care coverage while keeping costs low. Since his re-election, we have been faced with a healthcare reform that tears our country, and politicians, down the middle. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare,” is “A federal statute signed into law in March 2010 as a part of the healthcare reform agenda of the Obama administration. Signed under the title of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the law included multiple provisions that would take effect over a matter of years, including the expansion of Medicaid eligibility, the establishment of health insurance exchanges and prohibiting health insurers from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions” (Affordable Care Act). The reform is meant to help those who cannot cover the costs of coverage due to low income, or no jobs, as well as those who have been denied because of pre-existing heath conditions; it is essentially there to help those ultimately in need. Unfortunately, Obamacare is not beneficial to those who are currently covered, typically known as the average American, as it it is not cost effective nor constitutional.
In America the affordability and equality of access to healthcare is a crucial topic of debate when it comes to one's understanding of healthcare reform. The ability for a sick individual to attain proper treatment for their ailments has reached the upper echelons of government. Public outcry for a change in the handling of health insurance laws has aided in the establishment of the Affordable Healthcare Law (AHCL) to ensure the people of America will be able to get the medical attention they deserve as well as making that attention more affordable, as the name states. Since its creation, the AHCL has undergone scrutiny towards its effects on the government and its people; nevertheless, the new law must not be dismantled due to its function as a cornerstone of equal-opportunity healthcare, and if such a removal is allowed, there will be possibly detrimental effects on taxes, the economy, and poor people.
Health care reform is needed for four reasons. First, health care costs are rising. In 2011, the average cost for a family of four increased 7.3%, to $19,393. By 2030, payroll taxes will only cover 38% of Medicare costs. Second, health care reform is needed to improve the quality of care. Because of these reasons, President Barack Obama signed The Affordable Care Act, also known as ObamaCare, into law on March 23, 2010 and upheld by the Supreme Court on June 28, 2012. The goal is to give more Americans access to affordable, quality health insurance, and to reduce the growth in health care spending in the U.S. The Affordable Care Act contains ten titles that span over 1000 pages, but most of its key provisions are in first Title; The first title is about 140 pages long. The purpose of the law if to expand the affordability, quality, and availability of private and public health insurance through consumer protections, taxes, insurance exchanges, and other reforms.
The Affordable Care Act may be an expansion of Medicare that helps provide for needy United States citizens, but it negatively impacts members of the medical field. Many United States Citizens will receive medical care that they originally could not afford to receive, but not all citizens will be eligible for Medicare even with the program’s expansion. The Affordable Care Act could and will provide help to many United States citizens, but it will not perform its purpose efficiently without more thought and consideration of the act’s secondary effects. This act will prove to be both a tremendous help to those in poverty and a menace to those working in the healthcare setting.
The need for universal health care within the United States has been evident, and needed to be addressed. The old healthcare system was plagued with issues, including expensive premiums that were on the rise, along with an inflated average infant mortality rate and limited average life expectancy, which ultimately led to many people being left uninsured (“Affordable” 2). In the 2012 presidential election, one key issue was how to reform America’s broken health care system, and to instate a successful universal healthcare system that has resolved the previous issues. Being one of the last influential and competitive countries in the world without universal healthcare, the pressure was on for the United States to develop their own system. Since Barack Obama became president, Obamacare, instead of the proposed Romneycare, was born.
Health care is one of those issues where the political spectrum shows some overlap. Both sides want the same outcome: a healthy and happy society. However, the ways they want to accomplish this varies greatly. The Republicans are staunchly against government-organized healthcare. They believe that the less government the better, believing that “government run affordable health care leads to inefficiencies and can be disastrous to the nation’s health overall.” They believe that health care should be left to doctors, HMOs and insurance companies to decide and manage. However, the democrats’ main point on health care is that it should be funded and controlled by the government for the people. They hold that all people should be able to have the assurance of health without worrying about losing coverage or going into debt. This would be most effective for the poor and elderly, those who normally would not be able to afford coverage and need it most. As such, Med...