The approach to climate change has been a topic of debate for as long as the concept of climate change has been around. Some believe that the Hamiltonian response, a focused national response from the government, is necessary in order to get the country to correctly react to the problems the world is currently and will be facing. Others believe that the Jeffersonian response is more appropriate since it means that citizens would be in control of the changes and therefore more willing to make the changes and more likely to accept, follow, and tell others about these changes. However, to truly implement the kind of change necessary to combat climate change, a mixed approach is necessary to not only ensure that a larger portion of people want to follow the changes, but also ensures that the changes are practical and efficient. Any extremes in the matter will result in a large portion of people not taking the matter seriously or only affect a specific group of people. So why is neither response alone the right response and where should the government's control end and the people's begin in order to create the most effective response to climate change?
It is obvious that the community has been the source of some of the most creative and successful practices that have been proven to weather the problems of climate change. Henry Hurage, who is a farmer from Kenya, convinced 300 other farmers to follow practices he had learned in England. The result was that this particular group of farmers were the ones who fared the best when a drought had hit the area. They also became more self-reliant (McKibben, 2011). This is only one of the many examples of "experimental" innovations that communities all over the globe are adopting. However, whil...
... middle of paper ...
...is means that communities are choosing to be more environmentally aware, and therefore the people are more likely to follow these conservation programs.
Kadlecek, M. (2010). A Change in Climate. New York State Conservationist. Retrieved from
Kegans, M. (2005). Mountains of Corn and a Sea of Farm Subsidies. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://artsci.wustl.edu/~anthro/articles/09harvest.html.
Kennedy, D.M., Lizabeth, C., & Bailey, T.A. The American Pageant. Boston, M.A.: Houghton Mifflin Company.
McKibben, B. (2011). Eaarth. New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.
Richardson, J. ( 2011). Are All Farm Subsidies Giveaways to Corporate Farmers? Nope, Here's a Rundown on Both Good and Bad Subsidies. AlterNet. Retrieved from http://www.alternet.org/food/150621?page=entire.