Scope Of Project Scope

827 Words2 Pages

Scope Definition Scope is one of the three key factors that define quality. It is a combination of all the tasks and goals a project requires for successful completion. Furthermore, planning projects and monitoring their output as well as estimating costs and the required time for the project to be completed are parts of setting the scope. Factors Involved When changing the scope of a project, simultaneously the factors cost and time will be affected. One could compare the combination of the three factors with the structure of a triangle. In the case, that one of the three sides is adjusted, the other sides correspond. Thus, when more time is available for the project, the scope can be widened, and more tasks could have been added, which could not be accomplished in the previous time frame. Another possibility to add scope is when extra budget is available. Whenever scope is added, time and cost will be added to the plan. Changing a scope can as well have contractual implications. These would have to be evaluated and might need approval prior to implementation. The client will often have special requirements after the launch of the project and will want these to be included. "The project team may require new technologies in order to address some of the new requirements in the scope.” When it comes to project requirements and entering into an agreement with a client, it is of utmost importance that the scope is clearly defined, avoiding additional costs and assuring that deadlines are met. Calculating profit margins accurately can only be achieved with scope definitions of high accuracy. Relation to Quality The scope defines the three other factors, time, cost and quality. When delivering a service only two of the three requi... ... middle of paper ... ... than needed or demanded since that would cause the price and costs to increase. To ensure that the quality requirements are met, there are three steps that should be taken; plan, perform and monitor. Firstly determining which standards want to be implemented and the way they need to be achieved. Secondly, performing the planned actions. Lastly, monitoring the results to ensure that the standards are being met which involves identifying and eliminating potential problems that arose during the performance. Describing the Iron Triangle’s drivers of cost, time and scope, it becomes evident that changing one of those also affects the other two factors and in the end makes an impact on the quality. Therefore, it is significant to highlight that quality is not so much a driver of the Iron Triangle, but ultimately a result of utilizing the factors of cost, time, and scope.

Open Document