Arguments for Slavery

730 Words2 Pages

Just as ardently as abolitionists fought the institution of slavery, many citizens of the United States argued the advantages of owning human beings and keeping them in servitude as a piece of property. Slavery was not America’s finest hour, but the anti-abolitionists saw nothing wrong with the practice, arguing three key beliefs why slavery should be sanctioned: economic, religious and legal.

The American South became increasingly dependent on the lucrative cotton industry. The wealth and status associated with cotton prompted the expansion of plantations westward (Tindall & Shi, 2010, p.438, para. 2). Large plantations needed a huge labor force to harvest crops, and African slaves were cheaper and more readily available than indentured laborers from Europe. “They could more easily be bought from traders on the West African coast and were more immune to European diseases than indigenous Americans or imported white slaves” (Nash, A., n.d.). To free the slaves, proponents of slavery argued, would have a profound economic impact on the South, where reliance on slave labor was imperative to their success and survival. In addition, releasing four million slaves in to the general population would create competition for jobs and resources.

The religious argument defending slavery referred to biblical passages and claims that slavery was sanctioned by the Bible. Clergymen of all denominations joined in the dispute. “Had not the patriarchs of the Hebrew Bible held bondsmen? Had not Saint Paul advised servants to obey their masters and told a fugitive servant to return to his master? And had not Jesus remained silent on the subject, at least insofar as the Gospels reported his words?” (Tindall & Shi, 2010, p.436, para.4)...

... middle of paper ...

...a.1). It was a slippery slope of interpretation and vision, driven by the majority interest.

The institution of slavery is, indeed, a curious practice. It dehumanizes man based on whatever attributes the slaveholder views as unworthy, and assigns a value to human life as property, something to be used and discarded. There were many arguments in favor of slavery, none of which prevailed in the end, for there is no valid argument which supports the notion that any race of man is less valuable as a human being and undeserving of freedom and protected rights simply because of the color of his skin. Although the arguments favoring slavery seemed compelling under the circumstances at this time in history, there was a growing awareness that owning a person was immoral, and the outspoken abolitionists were gaining momentum in their fight for equality for all men.

Open Document