The Analysis of the Author´s Viewpoint in a Rose for Emily

666 Words2 Pages

The interesting narrator of “A Rose for Emily” are the first people. Frequently mentioning to themselves as “we.” The narrator talks occasionally for both the Jefferson men and the women. It additionally stretches over three generations: the Jefferson’s, Miss Emily’s Father, Miss Emily’s, and the “newer generation,” composed of the children of Miss Emily’s generation. The narrator is rather though on the first two generations, and it’s not difficult to perceive how their approach to Miss Emily may have drove her to her breakdown. This gives the narrative a moderately confessional quality. Observe how not one specific townsperson is thoroughly accountable for what happened to Emily. The eagerness of the town to now accept accountability is an optimistic sign, and one that admits us to visualize a more exceptional future for upcoming generations. We can think of several words to define the tone of the story that seem to dominate the affecting tones the narrator is conveying as Emily’s story is being tone. It’s ironic because in the story Emily is constantly given thorns instead of roses, and she contributes many thorns in return. Since the narrator is a member of the town, and takes accountability for all the townspeople’s actions, the narrator is admits to the crimes in opposition to Emily. This can also be portrayed as gossip, particularly when you are admitting to malefactions of others. The first line of Section IV is an acceptable characteristic of the aspects of tone: “So the next day we all said. ‘She will kill herself;’ and we said it would be the best thing.” This is where the aggravation comes in. This makes us mad, we get the feeling that the narrator is too exasperated, especially in this section. This gets us back to c... ... middle of paper ... ...onalities. Modernism endeavors to make something useful out of fragments. We can perceive this in “A Rose for Emily.” In Robert Frost’s poem, The Road Not Taken, the narrator has come to a split path in the woods. It’s autumn, and the leaves have started to change colors. The narrator is doubtful of which way to go, and desires to go both ways. He looks off to one path as far into the distance as he can, but suddenly chooses to take the other. He believes the path the chose to take is hardly as used as the other one, but authentically, the paths are somewhat identical, and the fallen leave both look pretty recent. The narrator expresses on how he intends to take the road that he didn’t take some other day, but assumes that he perhaps won’t ever come back. Alternatively, remotely in the future, he’ll be speaking about how his selection was ultimate and life altering.

Open Document