The First Amendment

1019 Words3 Pages

The 1st Amendment Freedom of speech is probably the most controversial amendment that there is within the Bill of Rights. “The first amendment of is freedom of religion, press, and expression, which states that congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances (Mount, S. 2010).” The first amendment gives the citizens of the U.S. the right to communicate one’s opinions and ideas with fear of government retaliation or censorship. The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a basic human right under article 19 of …show more content…

The amendment states “The emueration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people (Justia, 1970).” “The ninth amendment bars any denial of unenemurated rights is that denial is based on the enumeration of certain rights that are within the US Constitution, however the ninth amendment does not bar denial of unenumerated rights if the denial is based on the ueumeration of certain powers within the Constitution. The enumeration of powers that the courts have pointed, to in order to determine the extent of the unenumerated rights that are mentioned with the ninth amendment (Justia, 1970).” Some of the consequences of the ninth amendment are people would have to sneak around to get contraceptive devices, and make sure they were not seen for fear of punishment by the government. Another consequence was the fact that women were denied their most basic human right of protection for the use of contraceptives to avoid unwanted …show more content…

Connecticut, which challenged the state of Connecticut’s law that prohibited use of “any drug, medical article, or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception (Legal Dictionary, 2012).” This case began with Estelle Griswold, who was Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, and Dr. Charles Buxton, opened a birth control clinic in New Haven, Connecticut. The pair were arrested, tried, and convicted of offering services that prevented contraception, and fined. Estelle Griswold appealed the case, which had been upheld in both the appellate court and the Supreme Court of Connecticut. The case then went on to the US Supreme Court, “ where Griswold argued that the state law against the use of contraceptives violated the Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, which provides that “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges of immunities of citizens of the US; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law… nor deny any person the equal protection of the laws ((Legal Dictionary, 2012).” “The Supreme Court of the United States then, ruled that the Connecticut law was unconstitutional, and violated the “right to martial privacy”, in a 7-2 decision, which pointed out that although the Bill of Rights does not specifically mention “privacy,” it is inherent and implied

Open Document