The proponents argue from the point of view that suffering demands action (Moyn 3). This group believes that the United States is in the best position than any other country to stop the suffering of the Syrian people and the bloodshed going on, and therefore no action from the US means more innocent lives will continue to be lost (Moyn 3). The humanitarian argument, however, has not stimulated the US and its partners to intervene.
The case for military action mainly hinges on the past events of the 1990s. Notably, many proponents of military intervention in Libya point to the Rwanda Genocide of 1994. They disparage the actions of the then President Bill Clinton, who largely chose to stand idly by as Rwandan the death toll mounted. These proponents warn that Mr. Obama—and largely the US—will face the same regret if the US does not act and establish a no fly zone. One possible subscriber to such a view is Professor Christine Chinkin at the London School of Economics. She mainly asserts that the US is plainly hypocritical; that despite the talk of humanitarianism and rooting out tyranny wherever it hides, the US, at the end of the day, seems to have a policy that values some peoples’ rights over those o...
Economic instability is perhaps the category that engulfs most states with petroleum-depending economies, including economic giants like Russia. The downfall of these producers is particularly evident given the current and increasing downfall of oil world prices of more than 50% in the last six months. The increase in domestic supply of oil in North America that rendered the United States less dependable on petroleum imports undermined the influence of exporting countries, particularly the leverage that the once powerful tycoons of the OPEC possessed over international trade. These countries can no longer engage in an embargo like in the 1973, for they are even struggling with enormous deficits to meet their citizens’ basic
The Libyan government needs to realize that the mismanagement of oil wealth is hurting their country. Vast oil fields have centralized economic power in the hands of those who control it. This stints private sector growth and more often than not the wealth from the petroleum doesn't return back into the Libyan economy. At some point the oil reserves will run out or more accessible oil will be discovered elsewhere. In the wise words of Rashid bin Saeed Al Maktoum, the Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates, "My grandfather rode a camel, my father rode a camel, I drive a Mercedes, my son drives a Land Rover, his son will drive a Land Rover, but his son will ride a camel." The government needs to take steps to move power from oil companies to smaller businesses and back into the hands of the people. I believe this would allow Libya to address the problem that's rooted in their history longer than
As written in the SYNOPSIS The Responsibility To Protect: Core Principles The responsibility to protect embraces three specific responsibilities: in which the 2nd is where I’m reflecting from “The responsibility to react: to respond to situations of compelling human need with appropriate measures, which may include coercive measures like sanctions and international prosecution, and in extreme cases military intervention.” There are other ways to consider making peace other then having to resort with violent acts. Such as hindering of resources/funds and dealing with tyrants like Gaddafi before it get’s out of hand. The UN tends to wait til the last minute to react to issues such as this. As stated by Noam Chomsky “incidentally, in accord with the will of most Americans, who believe that the US should follow the will of the majority and that the UN, not the US, should take the lead in international crisis.” Meaning the US shouldn’t always be the fi...
Kramer, Otis, and Rosalind Montanez-Muhinda. "Counterpoint: U. S. Options Are Limited in Darfur." Points of View Reference Center. EBSCOhost, 2009. Web. 6 Mar. 2011. 0
America is dependent on other nations for their ability to create energy. The United States is the world’s largest consumer of oil at 18.49 million barrels of oil per day. And it will continue to be that way for the foreseeable future considering the next largest customer of oil only consumes about 60% of what the U.S. does. This makes the U.S. vulnerable to any instability that may arise in the energy industry. In 2011, the world’s top three oil companies were Saudi Aramco (12%), National Iranian Oil Company (5%), and China National Petroleum Corp (4%). The risk associated with these countries being the top oil producers is twofold. One, they are located half way around the world making it an expensive to transport the product logistically to a desired destination. And two, the U.S. has weak, if not contentious,...
...ople who were not helped, like those in Darfur, because the U.S. ground forces were held up keeping the peace in Iraq (204). He says that the impact of Iraq will be felt and deter interventions for years, creating an “Iraq Syndrome” (205). He goes on to say that the U.S. will say out of Human Rights interventions in favor of more concrete interests, and since the other two major powers also unlikely to intervene unless it is in their sphere of influence, “there is not much hope for humanitarian intervention in the modern-state formula” (205).
With the current spike in oil prices, many American consumers have asked, 'what is going on?' In order to fully understand the current situation and how it is affecting the economy one must look at a variety of factors including: the history of oil crisis in the United States, causes of the current situation, and possible outcomes for the future. It is only after meticulous research in these topics that one is prepared to answer the question, 'what is the best possible solution to the oil crisis?'
First, the threat of extreme terror and massacre was imminent throughout Libya. Although Gaddafi was only a symbolic figurehead for the nation, in reality, he exercised near-total control over considerable government decisions. For forty years, Libyans tolerated Gaddafi’s brutal suppression and senseless killings. (McDougall, 2003) Gaddafi’s regime controlled the media and utilized it to distribute propaganda and instill fear. Libyans feared the consequences of criticizing the regime, which included disappearance and exile. Charles Recknagel described Gaddafi’s re...