Texas Separation Of Powers Essay

543 Words2 Pages

The federal system used in Texas and the Unites States both contain similarities and differences, but I believe the separation of powers is better utilized in Texas. The U.S. and Texas have the same three branches of government; the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. The executive branch of the U.S. contains a president and vice president while Texas has a governor and lieutenant governor. Both the president and governor serve for four years, but unlike the president the governor has no limit to the amount of terms he can serve. Texas’ executive branch only allows the governor to appoint the secretary of state; other officeholders have to be elected. This limits the authority of the governor which I believe to be a benefit to Texas residents. The U.S. allows the president to appoint many head officials to federal agencies, giving the president most of the benefits. When officials have to be elected by a population of people instead of being appointed, it gives the people more power over who represents them in their government. When officials have to be elected they work harder to please their constituents and when they are just …show more content…

The qualifications for members of the House and Senate are alike among the U.S. and Texas and the way in which a bill becomes a law is also very similar. In Texas the legislator takes opinions from its residents to inform itself on public policy. One public policy Texas has been constantly changing is standardized testing. Texas has recently changed the test again calling it the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness. If one venture a little ways to the west they can also see that California has also changed its standardized test this year. It for years was titled as Standardized Testing and Reporting, now they have changed the title to California Assessment of Student Performance and

Open Document