Terrorism And Terrorism: Applied To Internal And External Terrorism

783 Words2 Pages

Many developed nations have seen terrorism as a huge national security problem. Even though, world leaders do not have the same vision and strategy against this problem. The U.S. leaders also have mixed feeling about terrorism. If you look at the recent presidential campaign in the U.S., Mr. Donald Trump sees Islamic religion as a problem, instead of Islamic radical groups, where domestic politics will create constraints for any government. My understanding of realism, it deals with power, basically military and economic power. The U.S. has a huge interest in the Middle East, and around the world because of its hegemonic characteristics. The terrorist groups also know they have to deal with the super power to achieve the goal. Non state terrorist …show more content…

However, this model emphasizes on nation-state, where terrorism can be built as a powerful threat. Even realists have often ignored terrorism, favoring on the notion that crime-fighting, which can be addressed by nation states. Thus, the structural realist idea can be applied to internal and external terrorism. An argument that, “Understanding international organized crime and terrorism in terms of networks has become a widely accepted paradigm in the field of international relations" (Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, 2008). Such a terrorist group, al-Qaida has a worldwide network, and their local and global goals would be different. On the other hand, ISIS doses not have worldwide network, but they have radicalized followers, which also create such a violence that we have seen in Paris. The realist theory provides different kind of insights into the foundation of alliances and interest of the local groups, as well as the entire network. Professor Mearsheimer also stated that all of the realist logic about state behavior will have a significant effect on how the war on terrorism is fought, so realism and terrorism are inextricably linked (UC, …show more content…

Richard Rubenstein says, “Foreign oppression may generate anger, but native complicity generates shame – and at a certain point, a sense of shame demands purifying action" (Rubenstein, 2002). Middle Eastern countries have been facing tremendous conflict because of dictatorship, and unequal distribution of wealth. People have an interest to have their rights, liberty, and economic freedom, and fighting with their regime (government); however, different types of interest groups (national/international) are playing a role for psychological fueling upon general people, creating more tension, aggression and arise the conflict. Increasing aggression lead to the terrorism act, where youths are joining ISIS and other terrorist organization. The young generation does not have reliable source to live a decent life. This causes to radicalization and joining in a terrorist group. The perceive a discrepancy between value expectations and value capabilities, and relative deprivation is the tension within your actual state and what you feel and you should be able to accomplish. Having a good house, regular income, good health care, education are normal expectations of every person, but it is not necessarily available for many people. When people do not have value capabilities, the aggression would be rising and it leads to violence and

Open Document