Tehran Conference Research Paper

1968 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: World War 2 propaganda

Paradoxically, the Soviet Union and the US fought together and won the war against Nazi Germany, and two years later they turned into complete enemies. How did these two countries become enemies so suddenly? And most importantly, if the mutation was so fast, did a real friendship ever exist between the USSR and the US during WWII? For sure, the USSR and the US were not hostile during WWII, however they could not be described as friends. The US and the Soviet Union could not win the war separately, so they had to join forces and create strong offensive against Nazi Germany. Meanwhile, their ideas were deeply divergent regarding the European future. Especially when WWII was coming to an end, the two major super powers started to show their real …show more content…

The Tehran Conference was a strategic meeting held between Joseph Stalin, Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. On one hand, the main outcome of the Tehran Conference was the commitment to the opening of a second front against Nazi Germany by the Western Allies. On the other hand, the conference addressed the relations between the Allies, the operations in Yugoslavia and against Japan, and most importantly The Big Three discussed the post-war settlement (Leahy 70). All the players at the table were rushing to draw the post WWII era. Security for the Big Three at The conference was a top priority NKVD. In fact the agency was able to implement a massive operation to prepare the location for the event (Omel'chuk and Iurchenko 82). Some scholars have described the Tehran meeting as a big farce. During the Tehran conference it was already clear what the world was falling into. On one side, the Soviet Union and on the other side the US and the UK. However, a direct confrontation was still premature and not beneficial. Even though WWII was coming to an end, there was still a war to win and an enemy to capture. Hence, at that time there were still no formal allies or enemies between the Big Three, there were just friendly country planning their next …show more content…

The strong political propaganda made by both USSR and US during Cold War, had driven the world to useless and pointless assumptions. The Cold War was the result of the expansionist political and economic policies of both USSR and US. On this topic, in 1962, President John Kennedy

Show More
Related

  • Cold War Dbq Essay

    750 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Cold War was a period of dark and melancholic times when the entire world lived in fear that the boiling pot may spill. The protectionist measures taken by Eisenhower kept the communists in check to suspend the progression of USSR’s radical ambitions and programs. From the suspenseful delirium from the Cold War, the United States often engaged in a dangerous policy of brinksmanship through the mid-1950s. Fortunately, these actions did not lead to a global nuclear disaster as both the US and USSR fully understood what the weapons of mass destruction were capable of.

    Read More

  • John F Kennedy Ethos Appeal In Jfk Speech

    628 Words  | 2 Pages

    On October 22, 1962, President John F. Kennedy reached out to America and the Cubans with his Cuban Missile Crisis Address to the Nation. During this time, the Cold War had occupied several countries of world. This war resulted from tensions, military and political, between Russia and its allies and America, its allies, and the Western Hemisphere. When President Kennedy gave his speech, Russia had occupied Cuba and began building military bases that contained nuclear warheads and other deadly missiles. People of America saw this as a threat to the freedom of the U.S. and the Western Hemisphere. In a time of great tension and fear, President Kennedy delivered his spectacular and reassuring speech that appealed to the citizens of American in several ways.

    Read More

  • Soviet Union Dbq

    678 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States and The Soviet Union were originally joined together by the want to defeat The Nazi army, in 1941-1945. The alliance remained, and strengthened, among the two until the end of World War II. At the end of World War II, a rupture between the two occurred. The differences began earlier, but there was a straw that broke the camels back. The reason The United States and The Soviet Union’s alliance did not work out is because The Soviet Union and The United States were complete opposites, The Soviet Union proved to be faulty, and they were never truly allies.

    Read More

  • The Failure Of The Potsdam Conference During The Cold War

    269 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Potsdam Conference occurred from July 17th to August 2nd, 1945. The conference took place between US president Harry Truman, Soviet’s Joseph Stain, and England’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill. The major goal of the Potsdam meeting was what would happen with Germany postwar. They wanted to be able to ensure the “eventual reconstruction of Germany’s democracy and peace.” At that time, the Soviet Union occupied a lot of the Eastern part of Germany and wanted a “unified, but unarmed Germany.” However, President Truman did not trust Stalin’s motives. In addition, Truman had found out that they had tested their atomic bomb and it was ready to be used in battle. Truman seeing the immense advantage the US had from a military standpoint knew he had leverage.

    Read More

  • The Decisions of Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin in WWII

    634 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Big Three met first in Iran’s capital, Tehran, where they covered four main problems (Naden and Blue 187-188). They had to make a plan of attack against the Nazis, so FDR planned D-Day with Churchill’s help and Stalin helped by attacking the Nazis. The second issue was if the Soviets would fight Japan in the Pacific. The Allies were losing and if the Soviets hadn’t stepped in they probably would’ve lost that front of the war (Teheran Conference 2505-2506). The next problem the Big Three talked about was how the boundaries of Poland, Germany and the USSR would be set up after the war. FDR liked the idea moving the Soviet border forward, taking parts of Poland, and of course Stalin wanted more territory. They also approved moving Poland’s border farther into Germany (Teheran Conference 2505-2506). They also discussed how they would keep the peace in the future. Because this was the Second World War after only a 21-year gap, Roosevelt wanted a new mediating group to stop another war from ever happening. He called it the “United Nations” (Naden and Blue 187).

    Read More

  • Cold War Revisionism

    1546 Words  | 4 Pages

    Discussions of the causes of the Cold War are often divisive, creating disparate ideological camps that focus the blame in different directions depending on the academic’s political disposition. One popular argument places the blame largely on the American people, whose emphasis on “strength over compromise” and their deployment of the atomic bomb in the Second World War’s Pacific theatre apparently functioned as two key catalysts to the conflict between US and Soviet powers. This revisionist approach minimizes Stalin’s forceful approach and history of violent leadership throughout World War 2, and focuses instead on President Harry Truman’s apparent insensitivity to “reasonable Soviet security anxieties” in his quest to impose “American interests on the world.” Revisionist historians depict President Truman as a “Cold War monger,” whose unjustified political use of the atomic bomb and ornery diplomatic style forced Russia into the Cold War to oppose the spread of a looming capitalist democratic monopoly. In reality, Truman’s responsibility for the Cold War and the atomic bomb drop should be minimized.

    Read More

  • U.S. Involvement and Impact in WW1

    1458 Words  | 3 Pages

    This war which was also called “The Great War” was a war of alliances and the two parties involved with the war was the “Allies” and the “Central Powers.” The first three nations that were involved in the “Allies” (Russia, France, and Britain) were given the nickname the "Triple Entente". Nations also involved with the Allies were Serbia, Belgium, Japan, Montenegro, New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa. New Zealand, Canada, and South Africa were involved ultimately because of their ties to Great Britain. Whenever the United States entered the war they wanted to stay neutral rather than join the “Allies”. Eventually, the Uni...

    Read More

  • The Historiography of the Origins of the Cold War

    2675 Words  | 6 Pages

    There have been many attempts to explain the origins of the Cold War that developed between the capitalist West and the communist East after the Second World War. Indeed, there is great disagreement in explaining the source for the Cold War; some explanations draw on events pre-1945; some draw only on issues of ideology; others look to economics; security concerns dominate some arguments; personalities are seen as the root cause for some historians. So wide is the range of the historiography of the origins of the Cold War that is has been said "the Cold War has also spawned a war among historians, a controversy over how the Cold War got started, whether or not it was inevitable, and (above all) who bears the main responsibility for starting it" (Hammond 4). There are three main schools of thought in the historiography: the traditional view, known alternatively as the orthodox or liberal view, which finds fault lying mostly with the Russians and deems security concerns to be the root cause of the Cold War; the revisionist view, which argues that it is, in fact, the United States and the West to blame for the Cold War and not the Russians, and cites economic open-door interests for spawning the Cold War; finally, the post-revisionist view which finds fault with both sides in the conflict and points to issues raised both by the traditionalists as well as the revisionists for combining to cause the Cold War. While strong arguments are made by historians writing from the traditionalist school, as well as those writing from the revisionist school, I claim that the viewpoint of the post-revisionists is the most accurate in describing the origins of the Cold War.

    Read More

  • Cold War Analysis

    1225 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his book Cold War: The American Crusade against World Communism, James Warren discusses the conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union, its causes, its consequences, and its future. Warren also analyzes why the United States was so afraid of communism and how this fear controlled both U.S. domestic and foreign policy. In George Washington’s Farewell Address, he warned future leaders to avoid foreign entanglements. However, the United States strayed away from this policy in 1941 after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. From then on, the United States realized that with its great power came great responsibility. The U.S. felt the responsibility to develop a strategy to combat the spread of world communism, which was viewed as the “Red menace.” The U.S. believed that communism would spread from the Soviet Union, across all of Europe; the U.S. understood that the spread of communism would not be very difficult because the destruction caused by World War II left many nations vulnerable to communism. Also, the Soviet Union had a highly-trained army, a ruthless leader, and a nation committed to Marxist-Leninism, which was a belief that human progress is the destruction of Western democracy and capitalism. The Cold War was a military, diplomatic, economic, and scientific struggle between the Soviet Union and the United States. The rivalry between these two nations also affected places such as Korea, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, Malaya, and Vietnam. The Cold War controlled many of the crises that occurred the last half of the 20th century. The major conflict of course was the threat of nuclear weapons. Thomas Larson wrote that “the vulnerability to weapons that could destroy entire countries...heightened fears and antagonisms and made th...

    Read More

  • Failure of the Détente Between the Superpowers

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    The significance of the Moscow summit was bolstered by the fact that it went ahead despite the Communist spring offensive (which was partly carried out to disrupt or even force the cancellat... ... middle of paper ... ... y détente left at all by 1979 stalled following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, were suspended. The ‘Carter Doctrine’ which followed showed the U.S. reverting back to a confrontational stance in the Cold War and in effect, with both sides now not showing any commitment to a relaxation in tensions, this was the confirmation of détente’s failure. Bibliography · Cohen, W.I. ed.

    Read More

  • Cold War

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nikita Khrushchev, Soviet leader of the time, was nervous about the buildup of nuclear weapons in Western Europe and Turkey by the United States. He felt a build-up of missiles i...

    Read More

  • The Causes of the Cold War - Post-Revisionist

    3007 Words  | 7 Pages

    "When a power vacuum separates great powers, as one did the United States and the Soviet Union at the end of World War II, they are unlikely to fill it without bumping up against and bruising each other" (Gaddis). This 'bumping' and 'bruising' caused the tensions and hostilities that surfaced in the years following WWII.

    Read More

  • Containment Of Communism

    2204 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Cold War is the closest the world has ever come to complete destruction. In this period of time, two world super powers were in a stalemate economically and militarily and were constantly competing to be the superior. The Cold War started as result of World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union had some differences on their perspectives of the world. United States being the richest country in the world promoted democracy and capitalism in the world. The newly formed Soviet Union thought that communism was a better political system because it transformed their economy and status in the world from nothing but a declining empire to a super power once again. The Cold War was a long series of events in which the communist tried to spread their ideas of government and socialist economy, known as expansionism, and the United States and some of the other Western powers such as Great Britain tried to contain it. Containment, a term introduced by George F. Kennan, was the foreign policy the United States practiced from 1946 to 1991 when the Soviet Union collapsed. The United States saw the Soviet Union to be a direct threat to the free world. During president Truman and Eisenhower’s administration the policy of containment evolved so drastically that American presidents would put anything on the line, including world peace.

    Read More

  • Wartime Conferences During The Cold War

    505 Words  | 2 Pages

    President Roosevelt called a meeting of the Allied powers. Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister of Great Britain, was willing to meet but the Premier of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin, ignored the fact. To please Stalin, they met in Tehran, Iran on November 28, 1943. Roosevelt and Churchill just wanted to make sure that they had the Soviet cooperation

    Read More

  • The Yalta Conference

    636 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Yalta Conference was one of the most important events in history, let alone, this century. It took place from February 4 to February 11, 1945, at Yalta, Crimea, a port/resort. The three main individuals at this meeting were Churchill of Great Britain, Roosevelt of the United States and Stalin of the U.S.S.R, known back then, and now known as Russia. This meeting was to discuss the post war effects.

    Read More

More about Tehran Conference Research Paper

Open Document