More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of child safeguarding
An understanding of safeguarding children
The importance of child safeguarding
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of child safeguarding
: Question 1 Answer: All children have a right to be able to grow up in a safe environment and safeguarding them is not only about their protection but that their interests are promoted. The legislations and guidance have been looked at and developed over a number of years, that have all been based around, recognition of children rights as individuals, who have their own entitlements, increasing focus on protecting vulnerable children and young people. Independent enquiries into the tragic deaths of children have led to legislation improving practice and responding to the failure of multi-agency teams to work together, ensuring they share information to make sure that children are receiving the care and support they have the right to. There
Under section 17 of the Children Act 1989 local authorities have a duty to assess the needs of a child in their area who may be deemed to be a Child in Need. Guidance stipulated by section 17 of the Children Act 1989. Particularly part 1 (a) and (b) of the Act states that local authorities have a duty to: “safeguard and promote the welfare of children within their area who are in need” (Children Act 1989).
In Section 1, Ethical Responsibilities to Children, Ideal 1-1.10 states that we are “to ensure that each child’s c...
Swan, Rita. 2010. “Equal rights for children under the law” Children’s Healthcare Is a Legal Duty, Inc
This essay will first address the statute used and interpretation of the threshold test by the courts, and then focus on cases involving vulnerable children to assess whether the statute in The Children Act 1989 is sufficient in protecting these children from harm. I will look at the argument in favour of the current approach taken by the courts, and the counter-argument in favour of changing the current approach. The arguments are delicately balanced and the law is always developing, so it will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court resolves this issue in future.
According to my experience as a specialist in the development of children, there is a need for a very positive and active partnership as far as the care of a child is concerned.... ... middle of paper ... ... To instill the culture of working together, employers should establish that teams are groups that collaborate and share skills in an effort to reach common objectives and goals that benefit the overall performance of the company.
To conclude, although Lord Laming is still certain that Every Child Matters did make a difference to most children’s lives in the UK and stated that there is assurance that the history of Victoria Climbie or Baby Peter will not repeat itself. Repeating what is said earlier, the aims of Every Child Matters are essential however the approach is treacherous. I still believe that capitalizing on the progress of frontline services is key to improving this application. The concern here is that Every Child Matters will again disappoint to save another child’s life due to failure in realising the limitations.
When a court is dealing with proceedings relating to a child, section 1 of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) governs that the court’s paramount consideration shall lie with the child’s welfare. The term paramount was explained by Lord Macdermott in J v C which means ‘that the child’s welfare is to be treated as the top item in a list of items relevant to the matter of question’. His Lordship went on to explain that when all the relevant facts and circumstances are taken into account and weighed, the outcome chosen by the court is based on the interests of the relevant child. Therefore any other party’s interest is only considered as far as it contributes to promote the child’s best interest.
The safeguarding of health comes with a substantial number of tasks, all of which cannot be accomplished by a single agency. Different agencies deal with different defined roles. Nonetheless, it is important to note that the challenges of safeguarding children are in one way or another related, which means that agencies dealing with different challenges have to liaise so as to ensure that children are fully protected. In what can be termed as the development of effective mechanisms of dealing with the problem of multi –agency cooperation and coordination in safeguarding children in the United Kingdom, Safeguarding Children Boards have been established to oversee the working of child protection agencies in the country (Webber, Mccree & Angeli
Children’s Social Care work with parents and other agencies to assess the stages of child protection procedures, record information and make decisions on taking further action. The police work closely with this agency to act on decisions made such as removing a child or the person responsible for the abuse while gathering evidence and carrying out investigations regarding the matter. Health professionals have a duty to report suspected non-accidental injuries to Children’s Social Care and examine children to give evidence of abuse. The Children Act 2004 requires every local area to have a Local Safeguarding Children Board to oversee the work of agencies involved in child protection, place policies and procedures for people who work with children and conduct serious case reviews when children die as a result of abuse. The NSPCC is the only charitable organisation that has the statutory power to take action when children are at risk of abuse. They provide services to support families and children and two helplines for children in danger and adults who are concerned for a child’s safety. They also raise awareness of abuse, share their expertise with other professionals and work to influence the law and social policy protect children more efficiently. There are also acts in place to protect children such as the Children Act 1989, the United Nations Convention On The Rights Of The Child 1989, the Education Act 2002 and the Children Act 2004. Legal framework from such acts are provided for Every Child Matters which requires early years practitioners to demonstrate that they provide activities that help children protect themselves. This may be through books and group talks known as “Stranger
...be seen gave the author a clear vision on how child protection has developed. Looking at the death of children and discussing them also gave some answers on how children services have developed over time over the years. In the evaluation the author discussed Tthe benefits and challenges offered by inter-agency and inter-professional partnership work have also been considered and it has emerged . By weighing the pros and cons of the author finds out that there is limited evidence on the outcomes for children and families. Even though a number of outcomes were discussed by Atkinson et al., their review provides evidence on the outcomes from professionals’ view point. Therefore, their review is not representative. Perhaps more study based on the outcomes or children and families will provide us a better understanding of on how effective inter-agency working really is.
Parton, N., Thorpe, D. and Wattam, C. (1997) Child Protection Risk and Moral Order, London: Macmillan
i. legislative requirements and expectations on individual services to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and
Throughout this essay, the health, safety and welfare policy and practise that came about after the Victoria Climbie case will be reviewed and evaluated. After arriving in England in November 1991 from the Ivory Coast, eight-year old Victoria Climbie suffered abuse from her great-aunt, Marie-Therese Kouao, and her great-aunts partner. The anguish and eventual murder of Victoria in 2000 from hypothermia, caused by malnourishment and damp conditions, provoked ‘the most extensive investigation into the child protection system in British history’ as described by Batty (Macleod-Brudenell, 2004). The high media profiled incident exposed a clear lack of precision and communication between all professionals and agencies involved. This is shown by the fact that the mistreatment Victoria was suffering had gone unnoticed by the social services, police and NHS staff, who failed to make each other aware of the clear danger signs. Within the Lord Laming Inquiry into Victoria Climbie’s death (2003), it can be seen that some features recur time after time in child abuse cases; inadequate resources to meet demands, inexperience and lack of skill of individual social workers. In addition, it can also be seen that crucial procedures were evidently not being followed. The procedure that was established after this case included the recommendations made by Lord Laming such as the Green Paper of Every Child Matters (DfES, 2003) and the Children Act (DfES, 2004). These ensure that all children have the fundamental right to be protected from harm and abuse. In addition to this, it also certifies all adults who come into contact with children and families have a duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of children.
...ople that everyone 's freedom depends upon that state. my child to learn is the importance of words and the necessity of asking questions and thinking to see the ideas behind the words
LSCB, (2013), SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN, YOUNG PEOPLE AND VULNERABLE ADULTS POLICY, (www.safechildren-cios.co.uk), [Assessed 1 November 2013].