Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of articles
Analysis of articles
Article analysis essay paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of articles
Article Analysis: Hospitals use tax exemption as a way for facing financial burdens. This allows hospitals to continue their operations by providing high quality care and providing free or discounted care to poor individuals. The implications for denying tax exemption can be financially detrimental to many non-for-profit hospitals and subsequently for many uninsured individuals who need access to care. Although I truly believe that there should be very strict regulations to rule tax exemptions for hospitals and healthcare organizations and I totally agree with the Supreme Court ruling in this case, I feel that this case is very controversial and leads to many fundamental arguments in regards to this subject. The court analyzed each of the factors outlined in Korzen’s case and concluded that Provena only satisfied two of the necessary factors and therefore did not qualify for the tax exemption. According to the court, Provena’s funds were mainly generated from providing medical services for a fee rather than from charities organizations. Patients were billed regularly and they were automatically referred to collections agencies when they could not pay. Hospital charges were waived only after it was determined that patients did not have or were not eligible for insurance coverage, lacked the resources to pay directly, and were eligible for the charitable care program. On the other hand, Provena alleges several important arguments in response to the courts analysis. They alleged that the hospital provided care to everyone who requested it regardless of their financial circumstances and that they provided discounted care for poor individuals. Nevertheless, the court stated that the discounted care was illusory because the charges w... ... middle of paper ... ... McKenna, B.J., McKenna, N.K. (2010). Provena Covenant Medical Center V. The Department of Revenue: Hospital property tax exemptions and the charitable use requirement. Health Care Lawyer, 26 (4), 9-11. Kiselev, M. (2010). Provena Covenant Medical Center V. Department of Revenue: The decision that may end charitable exemptions for nonprofit hospitals. Illinois Business Law Journal. Retrieved from, http://www.law.illinois.edu/. Baker, A. (2011). New U.S. census data show rise in number of uninsured Americans, underscoring importance of Affordable Care Act, http://www.apha.org/. Showalter, J.S. (2011). The Law of Healthcare Administration (5th ed.). Health Administration Press. ISBN: 978-1567939576. Bergen, k. (2011). Illinois Department of Revenue denies tax exemptions for 3 hospitals. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from, http://articles.chicagotribune.com/.
“In 1910, two-thirds of the hospital space was made up of charity patients and 60%of the income was from charity. In 1963, the fees from paying patients constituted 90.92% of the income.” (Gable v. Sisters of St. Francis, Pennsylvania)
In the case of Tomcik v. Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation & Correction, the main issue present was the medical negligence demonstrated by the staff of the medical clinic at the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction towards the inmate Tomcik. Specifically, nonfeasance, or the “failure to act, when there is a duty to act as a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances” (Pozgar, 2016, p. 192), was displayed when the employees at the medical clinic failed to give immediate medical attention to Tomcik when she continually signed the clinic list and “provided the reason she was requesting
Due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law on March 23rd, 2010; health care in the US is presently in a state of much needed transition. As of 2008, 46 Million residents (15% of the population) were uninsured and 60% of residents had coverage from private insurers. 55% of those covered by private insurers received it through their employer and 5% paid for it directly. Federal programs covered 24% of Americans; 13% under Medicare and10% under Medicaid. (Squires, 2010)
Four doctors, three terminally ill patients, and a nonprofit organization called Compassion in Dying, came together to file a suit arguing that prohibiting PAS is against a person’s right to liberty (Illingworth & Parmet, 2006). This became known as the Washington et al. v. Glucksberg et al. case. This case went to the Supreme Court in January of 1997 and by that following June was ruled constitutional to uphold PAS as illegal (Washington et al. v. Glucksberg et al., 1997). The penalty for any assistance in a ...
Wilson , James G. S., “Rights”, Principles of Health Care Ethics, Second Edition, eds. R.E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper and J.R. McMillan. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2007. pp. 239.
Healthcare ethics is defined as a system of moral principles that guide healthcare workers in making choices regarding medical care. At its core lies our attitudes regarding our personal rights and obligations we have to others. When an unprecedented situation comes into play, we rely on medical ethics to help determine an outcome that would be the best case scenario for all involved. In order to appropriately review this case study, we must first identify the key stakeholders, the ethical principles, policy implications at the federal, state, and local levels, financial implications, and a viable resolution for the situation.
Hospital A before the merger was a for-profit hospital, relatively new facility, in east side of town. It consisted of 110 hospital beds, 8 of which were reserved for transitional care. Services provided were: general surgery and same day surgery, full-service rehabilitation department and radiology department. Other services included kidney dialysis center, on-site retail pharmacy, blood bank, women’s center e...
Some medical facilities are not-for-profit organizations. They can be a charitable organization or an educational organization or both. There are other not-for-profit medical and public health programs that provide health care to many communities in this country. Some of the best hospitals in America are educational not-for-profit facilities. They work with some of the newest technology and some perform experimental procedures. Most public health programs are ran as not-for-profit organizations and operated for charitable and educational purposes. The not-for-profit organization is not liable to pay taxes under IRS code 501 (c)(3) (.org). This allows the organization to put its revenues back into the organization versus having to pay investors or owners. Unfortunately, over the past 20 years the amount of for-profit organizations has increased (Santa). The growing commercialization of health care has ethical implications and has become a matter of heated controversy (Santa). It’s becoming more difficult despite all the laws and regulations to protect patient’s privacy and confidentiality. An ethical implication that for-profits face is physicians receiving incentives for keeping cost down to increase profits. Some for-profits will encourage doctors to promote profit producing drugs, surgeries, tests and treatments. (Santa). Some of these same physicians may own the facility they operate which creates a huge conflict. On the other hand, financial incentives can cause physicians to delay important tests and treatments or to not perform them at all. In some cases patients are being discharged from hospitals before they are ready to go home (Orentlicher). On an ethical standpoint, the patient’s well being is put in jeopardy and the...
Patients seek medical attention from the nursing homes. There nursing homes get a large amount of financial aid on behalf of the government. The financial assistance is given in order to ensure that all the necessary health care facilities are available at the nursing homes. There are few fraud cases that have seemed to occur in the nursing homes. One of the fraud cases that is becoming very common in nursing homes is that the patients are charged wrong amounts for the services that they acquire from the nursing home. The patient generally comes with some disease to seek medical attention. The nursing home raises fraud cases by advising unnecessary tests and procedures to be done on the patients. These tests or procedures may not be required for the patient. As the patient is limited in knowledge, the tests and procedures are done on the patient while charging the patient with a heavy amount of bill. (LLP, 2016) The nursing homes does not cater the specific problems that ha been raised by the patient rather they start to encounter on more details that are unnecessary and not even needed by the patient. The case is about a nursing home in Washington that charges heavy amounts to the patient for unnecessary treatments and procedures. (PEAR,
Ethical principals are extremely important to understand in the healthcare field. Ethical responsibilities in any situation depend on the role of the healthcare worker and the nature of the decision being made. Healthcare administrators and professionals must make ethical decisions that can be an everyday or controversial situation. When making such decisions, it is imperative to consider the four major principles of ethics: autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and distributive. By using these four principles, ethical decisions can effectively be made. For the purpose of this paper, examined will be the example of the treatment of an uninsured homeless patient. Poor health care be a cause and a result of homelessness.
Berman, M. L. (2011). From Health Care Reform to Public Health Reform. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(3), 328-339. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00603.x
In America the affordability and equality of access to healthcare is a crucial topic of debate when it comes to one's understanding of healthcare reform. The ability for a sick individual to attain proper treatment for their ailments has reached the upper echelons of government. Public outcry for a change in the handling of health insurance laws has aided in the establishment of the Affordable Healthcare Law (AHCL) to ensure the people of America will be able to get the medical attention they deserve as well as making that attention more affordable, as the name states. Since its creation, the AHCL has undergone scrutiny towards its effects on the government and its people; nevertheless, the new law must not be dismantled due to its function as a cornerstone of equal-opportunity healthcare, and if such a removal is allowed, there will be possibly detrimental effects on taxes, the economy, and poor people.
Courts,” in Health Politics and Policy, 4th edition (James A. Morone, Theodor J. Litman, and
Many changes in health care insurance have been made to increase the amount of individuals with health insurance coverage. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted in 2010 in efforts to help solve some of the biggest issues that Americans faced with health care and its availability (The White House, 2016). As of today, more than 9 out of 10 Americans have health insurance (The White House, 2016). This means that 20 million people have gained health insurance since the ACA was enacted (The White House, 2016).