Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
celebrity culture by frank furedi argumentative essay
celebrity culture by frank furedi argumentative essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Stains As celebrities stand distinctively among the masses and cast out their halos of personality charm and strong suits of skilled abilities, the controversies about them are unavoidable shadows created from their fame. With the popularization of celebrity culture, information synchronization, and communication technology, their lives are publicly exposed and various forms of media (depending on eras) record their flaws. Tough information transmitted to audiences are frequently biased, evidences of objective reality remains, even in the remote past. Different from temporary public opinions that often fall into bidirectional extremes, citizens of the United States of America seems to come to a general agreement speaking of the founding fathers …show more content…
In his statement, he claimed that after the capture of Jumonville, “sometime after the Indians came up the half king [Tanacharison] took his Tomahawk and split the head the head of the French Captain [Jumonville] having asked if he was an Englishman and having been told he was a French man. He then took out his brains and washed his hands with them and then scalped him.” With brutally vivid details, however, the statement Washington signed after being captured at Fort Necessity in the Great Meadows, tells a different story. Just over a month after the Jumonville skirmish, another French trooped accompanied with their Native American allies overwhelmed Washington’s position and forced Washington to surrender. Since the troop was led by Jumonville’s half-brother, during the negotiations, he had Washington signed a French statement (A language that Washington was not capable of) admitting assassination of Jumonville. Tough the document was more likely compelled on Washington and the authenticity in the statement is questionable, nevertheless, it is certain that all the aftermath created by Jumonville’s death was caused by Washington’s lack of discipline on his subordinates or considerations for the overall war
Marshall P. David (1997). Celebrity Power; Fame in Contemporary Culture. May 16, 2010. Electronically retrieved from
“Posts.” Fame is a dangerous Drug: A Phenomenological Glimpse of Celebrity.” N.p. ,n.d. Web 15. Feb 2014
The star text of a celebrity can help to decipher their image and transitions they may undergo. In order to better understand these transitions, one must know the definition of a star text. A star text is the sum of everything we affiliate with celebrities, which includes their body of work, promotion, publicity, and audience participation (Jackson, 08/09/16). One must note that “celebrity doesn 't happen because someone has extraordinary qualities – it is discursively constructed by the way in which the person is publicised and meanings about them circulate” (O 'Shaughnessy and Stadler 424). Destiny Hope Cyrus, “an American singer and actress, became a sensation in the television series
It is the public discourse, after the death of a celebrity, which results in the emergence of an icon. In books, films, and other media content about the celebrity, various narratives and central values become associated with the celebrity. After several years of continued public interest in the dead celebrity, the image and values associated with the celebrity become more significant than, and transcend, the factual details about the historical existence of the individual. The following section will outline elements contributing to the construction of the image of a celebrity, after their death.
As Boorstin suggests, the celebrity is fabricated in order to satisfy “our exaggerated expectations of human greatness’. In doing this celebrity also exaggerate the flaws that work against set cultural norms (Turner, 3). Celebrity has a history, during the golden age of Hollywood, gossip columnists reframed the ways audiences engaged with celebrity culture , through a significant shift to gossip about the personal lives of stars (Meyers, 24). A recent article on Stuff.co.nz, “The Bachelor NZ: Naz 's text to other man revealed” illuminates this gossip culture, the way it intertwines her life of fame and her private life. This gossip culture is an environment that produces, circulates and consumes pesonal desire, therefore organising and negotiating the cultural norm of social interaction (Meyers 19). The ‘crisis’ female celebrity’s role in this negotiation is her allusion to a larger set of dilemmas in western culture about the role of women in public life (Negra,
The celebrity gossips are indeed the most important news in the modern day society since it benefits the younger generation. For instance, some gossip stories motivate the young to explore the singing or acting talents so as to earn what their favorite celebrities earn. Additionally, popular celebrity gossip blogs provide the best opportunity for marketers to reach out for their target market segments. The senses of humor, as well as the criticisms associated with the readers’ comments often ruin the public image of the concerned celebrities, especially if they are abusive.
Celebrities--love them or hate them--have become an epidemic in today’s society and will continue to negatively affect those who continually position them in influential parts of life. The word “celebrity” is derived from the word “celebrate,” in that a person is supposedly famous because the community celebrates him or her (Wright 1). Celebrities influence the public in many negative ways, and since the invention of television and the internet, even more are affected each and every day, and lifestyles are more influenced in today’s society. Gossip magazines are only still around due to people’s fascination with celebrities in the public eye. News channels most likely than not have now relied on celebrity gossip to gain and maintain viewers in the twenty-first century. The reality of today’s media and celebrity culture is that public figures with a spotlight on them, either because of good or bad reasoning, are the role models of the twenty first century (Aalai 1). There is no shortage of celebrities and pop stars who have adopted the mindset that there is no such thing as a negative publicity (Huston, et al. 3), and because of this, celebrities more negatively than positively affect society’s public eye of today. Celebrity lifestyles have become increasingly more prevalent in today’s society, especially to teens and younger adults; they negatively affect its viewers through means of advertising products and self-images, including the fashion industry, unreal lifestyles portrayed across reality TV shows, and the news of the aftermath showcased to the public.
Erma Bombeck once said, “Some say our national pastime is baseball. Not me. It’s gossip.” Every day, Americans buy magazines like US Weekly, People and Star or visit websites like Hollywood Gossip and omg! to get their celebrity gossip fix. For the sake of clarity, rather than differentiating between celebrity news and celebrity gossip, which would arguably be an impossible task, we will consider all material presented in the media about celebrities to be gossip. The sheer quantity of celebrity gossip in the media might make it seem impossible to apply any sort of logic or classification to it, but celebrity gossip can generally be classified based upon the content or subject matter it addresses.
The celebrity gossip industry has affected our assumptions about entertainment. Usually, we assume that entertainment is just for fun, entertainment is only a reflection of our culture, and entertainment is a personal choice. Nowadays, entertainment is not just for fun. Celebrities entertain us in many ways, but sometimes we do not enjoy what they do yet we still watch them. For instance, many teen idols have had meltdowns. Although it is not fun to...
People often look up to celebrities as role models, but aren’t aware of the way they live. The media doesn’t portray the obsession, the other side of fame, or their broad casting. The stories read were helpful to acknowledge the way celebrities have their positive and negative sides of fame, as well as their reality shows. Over all they relate to how a celebrity can handle the fame. Their lives aren’t normal compared to ordinary people. Celebrity lifestyle may not be the life one would want to live due to the fan obsession and unhealthy lifestyle. While viewers often think of the positive aspects of fame, we are actually invested in celebrities because of their negative experiences.
This is due to the firm divide between what is depicted on the media and what actually occurs in real life, due to the constant aid of different workers that assist celebrities in maintaining their image (Meyers 20). Meyers claims that the public are aware of such a divide and consume celebrity news with that divide in mind (20). Turner and Braeme support this notion by stating that “a definition of celebrity is countervailed by equally popular media discourses that emphasise its phoniness and constructedness”. Negra challenges this outlook by arguing that there are four fundamental reasons behind the way female celebrities are represented (2008). Firstly, it challenges the notion of femininity. Secondly, “trainwreck female celebrities”, although hated on, are addictive in an entertainment sense to follow and watch. Thirdly, the death of the correlation between fame and what is deemed to be talent. Fourthly, the challenges that occur as a result in between the death of the earlier mentioned correlation and the values and morals society holds
One of the most key predictors of celebrity influence is the involvement with the celebrity. In the June 2010 issue of the Journal of Health Communication, W.J. Brown states that, “Involvement is a concept that communication scholars have used to describe how audience members relate to individuals depicted in and through the mass media” (361). For instance, recent research on television effects point to television viewers becoming very involved with both television characters and television stars through repeated media exposure. There are several theories of involvement that are valuable in the study of celebrity athletes; basking in reflective glory, parasocial interaction, and identification.
Famous people should be given more privacy by the media as they are too humans and they need to be in a private for some reasons. According to Shoai (2012), the constant attention given to famous people make their personal lives get over exposed and they are brought to public more often than they want. Shoai (2012) contends that media negative role destroys the celebrities’ live and famous people are always followed by media. There is a thin line between a celebrity’s private life and professional life when the media tries to expose his or her private life, and this ac...
Not all bad comes media attention. Numerous celebrities would not be popular without the media attention. For example the Kardashians could not live they way they do with out them. Thanks to the part their father had in the OJ Simpson case and Kim's mischievous doings they quickly became bombarded by the media.“We recognized long ago that the paparazzi were just trying to do their job. Same with the press,” said the Ka...
The media is well known as letting people know the truth without fear or favour, but it is also true that the media is spreading rumours about people without any proof. It is unacceptable to make people read lies about famous people, especially to those who consider them as their Role models. Some of the celebrities who have been in the entertainment industry for a long time have accepted that the media will always have something to say about their personal lives. However the media also manage to get hidden secrets of celebrities without caring about their privacy.