Parental Control Vs. Teenage Independence: The Canning Case

1227 Words3 Pages

Rachel Canning was an 18 year old, high school honor student who sued her parents to pay for her schooling and living costs even though she no longer lives under their house. Canning claims that her parents kicked her out of the house; however, the parents claim that she moved out since she refused to listen to rules, do chores, or end her relationship with her boyfriend. This was a controversial case since it challenged the parent’s right to exert rules and discipline their child. The public now fears that parents will live in hear of establishing house rules. The judge ruled that the parents will not be required to pay for Canning’s high school tuition, provide a weekly allowance, or additional financial support. Recently, Canning has been in the news again for accusing her now ex-boyfriend of assaulting her and both have set a restraining order on one another. However, the charges were later dropped to clear both records for college. Canning eventually reconciled with her parents, withdrew her lawsuit, and moved back into their home. She will not be attending New England University as a biomedical engineering major. Parents sacrifice for their children so that they can become …show more content…

She responded to the University via email, in the style of a rejection letter stating that she will be attending the fall semester. She posted a screenshot of the mail on her tumblr account which attracted over 100,000 likes. Others criticized her for throwing a tantrum and getting attention/praise for her childish actions. O’Dell stated that she she “wanted to give college a taste of their own medicine.” Duke University responded with an email stating that she could request an appeal; however, there has been 500 requests and only 4 approved in the past decade. O’Dell is now attending the University of Southern California and majoring in biology with a minor in

Open Document