TANF Case Study

1660 Words4 Pages

Introduction What is TANF? The Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program was created under the 1996 welfare reform law known as the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (Falk, 2014). TANF is funded by a $16.5 billion-per-year basic federal block grant. Each state is also required to contribute at least $10.4 billion under a maintenance-of-effort (MOE) requirement (Schott, 2012). TANF’s primary purpose is to fund a wide range of benefits and services for low-income families with children. These services include cash assistance, child care, and services for children who have been or are at risk of being abused or neglected Clientele The requirements to receive TANF benefits vary from state to state. …show more content…

Each state is responsible for how the benefits are allocated. The application process for benefits is very similar among the states. However, 12 states (Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah) have laws regarding receiving benefits and drug testing. In 2011, 36 states proposed some form of drug testing for TANF benefits; in 2012, 28 states; in 2013, 29 states; and in 2014, 18 states. As of February 2015, at least 14 states have proposed legislation requiring some form of drug testing or screening for public assistance recipients (Finzel, …show more content…

The TANF program has several purposes: assist needy families, end dependency by promoting job preparation, and prevent and reduce out-of wedlock pregnancies. To qualify for benefits, Montana requires residence, pregnancy or responsibility for a child under 19 years of age, low or very low income, and either under-employment, unemployment or imminent unemployment (Benefits.Gov, n.d.). TANF benefits are based on family size and gross monthly income (GMI). If approved, TANF cash assistance is limited to 60 months in an adult’s lifetime. Currently, the final requirement, is an application process. However, there is an additional requirement being considered in Montana legislation: HB 200. HB 200 would require all applicants to be screened and possibly tested for illegal drugs. It is estimated the cost to screen all applicants and test those who are identified would be $63,285 from the general fund in 2016 and $39,950 per year thereafter (Carter,

Open Document