The readiness of the United States Army is something that many American citizens are guilty of taking advantage of. For nearly two hundred and thirty-nine years the Army has been responsible for all land-based military operations concerning the United States of America and it's interests. Months and years of training go into readying every single soldier for that moment when he or she will be called upon. Now, imagine that readiness being compromised by poor leadership or the poor development of future Army leaders. With the ever changing landscape of how the world fights it's wars, coupled with the probable possibility of downsizing in the US military, existing and new leaders must be sharp and honorable (Tan, 2011). They must be intellectually capable to overcome and adapt to any situation to keep the soldiers safe and effective.
Great leadership can motivate an entire nation of people to sand and follow. It shows greatness, and what a well lead team or nation can do with a single purpose in mind. On the other side of that coin is poor leadership and the damaging affects it can have on an organization and its people. The military has long been known to produce great leaders. Civilian leaders seem to always be under the microscope of the public with the exception of some greats like Steve jobs, Elon Musk, the founders of Google, but their approach to leadership is much different than the military. The major reason for the difference is the cost of failure. With the military under a fast transition, the styles and approaches to leadership have changed. The major
There are a number of significant difficulties for today’s military - the Global War on Terrorism or what has recently been termed the “Long War;” weapon system acquisitions and personnel draw downs. The focus of this paper is on one strategic component of the military quest—Leadership. More specifically, it will center on servant leadership and its impact on the military’s vision.
HBO’s series “Band Of Brothers” involves analysis of effective leadership and what qualities make for an effective leader. Despite having several similarities including serving in the same unit, holding leadership roles and suffering from some sort of trauma several of these leaders serve as foils for each other. By analyzing the differences between Captain Winters, Sergeant Lipton and Lieutenant Dike an argument can be made to decide what qualities make the most effective and ineffective leader. By looking at what the leader does, what the leader says and what others say about the leader the series determines what does and does not make a good leader in a military setting.
Leadership is a multidimensional skill that in necessary in a wide variety of situations. In the video, Stanley McChrystal describes how he found himself in a situation where leadership was essential, yet exceedingly difficult. Stanley found that the situation had unique obstacles and that the environment had changed dramatically from the one to which he was accustomed. Yet similarly to many great leaders before him, Stanley utilized his skills and knowledge to learn and to grow his leadership ability to provide quality leadership to those who followed him. This paper is going to cover some of the ways Stanley was able to accomplish this task.
CHAPTER ONE
1- INTRODUCTION:
1.1 Background of study-- UK Police Force
UK police is one of the professional police force around the world and is known for their professionalism, dedication, performance and motivational commitment toward their duties and nation as a whole. Like any other force, it needs motivation to carry on its commitment level. On organizational level, there are a number of motivational factors and theories which are working to keep this motivational level at the top of the world, but there is another factor which provides a roadmap for the organization towards professional commitments. This is leadership.
In addition ,each Organization, nation and religion bring with it a different culture and the Commander is ultimately responsible for developing himself as well as an effective team that can overcome its own internal cultural differences in order to achieve the mission. But ,that does not mean, at all ,Organization either military nor civilian, should not apply maximum effort in building up the mid and lower level Leader skills and attributes. As the, Operational Commanders require experience in both the operational and tactical levels, to allow them to improve their knowledge and intuition needed to understand how tactical and operational possibilities interrelate with each other.
The Greek philosopher Heraclitus stated, “the only thing that is constant is change” (“Goodreads”). This quote serves as an illustration of the episodic protracted and contracted nature of the Army. The events of September 11, 2001, and subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq during the global war on terror, led to expansion and force structure changes in the Army. Presently, the United States is enacting measures to become more fiscally prudent. This has led to overall decrease in the Army’s budget. Consequently, the Army has imposed force-shaping measures to support these congressionally mandated reductions. The needs and requirements of the current strategic environment drive transformation in the military. The elements of transformation consist of causation factors, supporting policies, and its overall effectiveness. Leaders at the tactical, operational, and strategic level must possess insight on all these elements.
In conclusion, there are three identified critical leadership challenges and a suggested course of action for resolution. As we prepare for our next overseas assignment, a vision for the Brigade can only strengthen and help congeal us into a learning organization. The setting of clear expectations will influence your subordinate leaders, both officers and NCOs and build upon the concept of team building. All of this will bring the overall esprit de corps and conduct of the Brigade to a sharp focus and unit climate will improve as a result.
Toffler, Patrick A. (2016), FY 17-18 America’s Army – Our Profession Theme, “One Army, Indivisible”. Information paper