preview

Symbolism In The Primavera

analytical Essay
1024 words
1024 words
bookmark

Botticelli’s great work of art the Primavera, also known as Allegory of Spring, painted ca. 1482, depicts different mythical characters, and is generally regarded as an allegorical depiction of spring. However, its symbolism and content have been subject to much controversy, and the painting is still interpreted differently by scholars to this day. Going through the different ways it has been interpreted, it is impossible to formulate a clear consensus. Its unclear origins make varying analyses and interpretations possible. However, it is clear that most scholars believe that the painting is drawn from literary inspirations.
Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi, known as Sandro Botticelli, was an Italian Renaissance artist born in Florence in 1445 (Gebhart 9). One of his most famous and controversial paintings is the Primavera, although it wasn’t always that way. Vasari, one of his contemporaries, simply described the painting as “Venus with the Graces who cover her with flowers, representing Spring” (Gebhart …show more content…

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how botticelli's primavera, also known as allegory of spring, depicts different mythical characters, and is generally regarded as an allegorical depiction of spring.
  • Analyzes how alessandro di mariano filipepi, known as sandro botticelli, was an italian renaissance artist born in florence in 1445. the primavera portrays 9 characters in a grove.
  • Argues that the painting is grounded in ovid’s fasti, and other similar texts.
  • Analyzes how andrews argues that angelo poliziano familiarized botticelli with the fasti, and that ovid’s fasti served as an important inspiration to the artist.
  • Analyzes how poliziano suggested to botticelli that he chose horace's ode to venus as the classical source of a painting that was meant to celebrate lorenzo di pierfrancesco
  • Explains that girolamo aleandro jr. has been noted as of one the primavera’s literary inspirations. his book discusses the meaning of syncretistic solar relief.
  • Analyzes how the medici family popularized neoplatonism in their circle. marsilio ficino was botticelli's spiritual mentor at the time the primavera was painted.
  • Concludes that botticelli's primavera is a seemingly simple work of art that has plagued art historians with contradicting interpretations for centuries.

The Primavera can be viewed as a depiction of Neoplatonism as Marsilio Ficino was “the spiritual mentor of Botticelli 's patron at the time the 'Primavera ' was painted”, and they discussed the Neoplatonic conception of the classical Gods in their correspondences (Gombrich 7). To Botticelli’s patron, who is most likely a member of the Medici family- and probably Lorenzo di Pierfrancesco- Venus would have represented Humanitas, embracing Love and Charity, Dignity and Magnanimity, Liberality and Magnificence, Comeliness and Modesty, Charm and Splendour. Thus, to Lorenzo, Venus did not represent ust (Gombrich 17). Given the popular Neoplatonism of the Italian Renaissance, and the speculation that the painting was commissioned by Lorenzo, it is therefore highly likely that Botticelli represented Neoplatonic love in his

Get Access