Sustainability Of Singaporean Nation

1301 Words3 Pages

Peck Jie Sheng Daniel D5 CA2 Essay “Singapore’s economic prosperity since 1965 has ensured the survival and sustainability of the Singaporean nation.” To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Since achieving independence in 1965, Singapore has experienced tremendous economic growth. GDP per capita has risen from US$516 in 1965 to US$54,776 in 2013 – one of the world’s highest. However, this economic prosperity has not come easily. Singapore’s economy has undergone constant restructuring to remain globally competitive. Starting with an export-oriented industrialization (EOI) strategy in the 1960s and 1970s, the economy has moved rapidly up the value chain. Today, Singapore is a knowledge-based economy and net capital exporter. These transitions were not a natural product of market forces. Instead, the Singapore government has had a long-standing strategic role, dictating the country’s economic direction, constructing markets and subsidizing infrastructure . Singapore’s economic success has left an indelible imprint on its nationhood. Some even argue that without it, the Singaporean nation would not have survived. However today, there is growing debate concerning whether past and present economic policies have been too growth-focused, creating inequality and social divides that threaten the sustainability of the nation. This essay examines these assertions. A nation is “a community of people, whose members are bound together by a sense of solidarity, a common culture, a national consciousness” . By this definition, the Singaporean nation started out especially vulnerable. Nationhood was unexpectedly forced upon Singapore in 1965 and national consciousness was low. Socio-political tensions also existed. R... ... middle of paper ... ...Over the past 50 years, the existence of a relatively united, turmoil-free Singapore, together with strong electoral support for the state, partly suggests that the economic prosperity achieved has helped the survival and sustainability of the nation. However, the tensions and discontent that have arisen in recent years suggest that Singapore’s economic strategy for the future requires rebalancing. Increasingly, the effect of economic growth seems to be counter-productive in nation-building if Singaporeans cannot partake in it, or feel marginalized. The state is likely to have to make some tough trade-offs to resolve this, and sacrificing some economic success might be on the agenda. (1233 words) “I acknowledge that this research essay is the product of my own work and research. All materials consulted — including websites — have been duly cited and credited.”

Open Document