Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Long term effects of imperialism on somalia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Long term effects of imperialism on somalia
Before 1991, Somalia had an unstable government and with that they don’t have proper control of their people, people starve and become aggressive, when the US tried to send aid into the country we have to send armed men because relief workers are being killed for being in Somalia says Foreign Affairs. For well over 20 years Somalia has lived in anarchy. This can no longer go on with tragedy occurring in the nation on a regular basis. Some people would shrug off another country or send a few dollars to the funds to help African nations. These funds don’t specifically say which nations we help. We should care about Somalia because journalists are being targeted and attacked, the women are abused and because war is waged in the streets because of the collapsed government.
Journalists in Somalia are targeted, attack and even killed for reporting stories. December 2011 a man working for a cable station was also killed notes the African Press Organization, Database of Press Releases Related to Africa, going on to say that, “Hassan Osman Abdi, director of the Shabelle Media Network, was shot by unidentified men outside his home in the Wadajir district in January 2012 and died of his injuries.” Targeted News Service stated that he is the third journalist to be killed in Somalia. The article continued to on the matter pointing out that, “At least 25 Somali journalists have been killed in Somalia since 2007 and many others have been injured.” In January of 2013, journalists have been unlawfully held against their will for at least a week if not more claims another article from Targeted News Service. A handful of journalists from varied sources of media were detained. These journalists are being held because they are supposedly linked to a ...
... middle of paper ...
...cs: U.N. experts find "subhuman conditions" in Somalia." Global Information Network: 1. Sep 04 2002. ProQuest. Web. 8 Oct. 2013.
"Somalia: Attacks Against Journalists must Stop." Targeted News Service. Feb 29 2012. ProQuest. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
"Somalia: Free Journalist, Others Unlawfully Detained." Targeted News Service. Jan 23 2013. ProQuest. Web. 10 Oct. 2013 .
“Somali Government Denies Ethiopia Sent Troops into Somalia.” Lanham: Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc, 2010. ProQuest. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
"Somalia: Protection of Civilians and Human Rights are Critical for Stable Future." African Press Organisation, Database of Press Releases Related to Africa. Feb 23 2012. ProQuest. Web. 10 Oct. 2013 .
Webersik, Christian. "Differences that Matter: The struggle of the marginalized in Somalia." Africa (pre-2011) 74.4 (2004): 516-33. ProQuest. Web. 8 Oct. 2013.
Stanton, Gregory H. "Genocides and Conflicts." World Without Genocide. World Without Genocide, 7 May 2013. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. .
“UN Extends Darfur Force Mandate.” Aljazeera.net. 31 Jul 2010: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 08 Nov 2013.
The U.S. and other Western nations support the fragile Somali regime, which is battling an Islamic insurgency, as part of the counterterrorism strategy for the region.” As apparent, the United States has put a counterterrorism strategy into place, to help bring down the power that Somalia has over child soldiers. As seen from “Armed & Underage” by Jeffrey Gettleman, “.200,000 children worldwide are still being used as combatants, usually against their will. And it isn't just boys: Girls are often pressed into duty as cooks or messengers.
Again, the United States entered the conflict failing to adhere to all the principals of jus ad bellum, espousing the principles of jus in bello, and inadequately upholding those of jus post bellum. The US entered the war an unjust nation, and left the conflict in a rather unjust manner. As a result, Somalia faces hardship over two decades later with no signs of a hasty recovery. Even worse, with the problem lingering and the international debt crisis, few countries are willing to intervene in Africa to cut out a solution. How long will the world let Somali people starve and whose job is it to intervene if America is unwilling?
The. “Country of Somalia.” Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia. Grolier Inc. -. 2001. The 'Secondary' of 11 Sep. 2001. 6.
Meja, Thelma. "Honduras: Pressure Mounts As More Journalists Are Killed." Global Information NetworkMay 03 2010. ProQuest. Web. 22 Oct 2013 .
At that time in the early 1990’s the U.S. was the only superpower country left in the world. The Soviet Union collapsed after the Cold War and the left the U.S. at the top. With the U.S. being the only superpower left, it meant that they were the only ones who could try to keep peace between other countries and hopefully end violence in the world. At the time, Somalia was a complete disaster and still is to this day. They have no structural government and warlords rule parts of the country. The one warlord at the time, Mohamed Farrah Aidid, was stealing shipments of food from the U.S. to the starving citizens in the rest of Somalia. The U.S. did not like this, so they set up a plan to capture Aidid and his men in a building near the Bakaara Market. The U.S. just got done defeating Saddam Hussein’s army in the first Gulf War. Before the war, Hussein had one of the largest armies in the world. The U.S. defeated them in a couple of weeks and gave them a massive amount of confidence going into this raid to try to capture Aidid.
Friedman, U. (2011, July 19). What It took for the U.N to declare famine in Somalia. Retrieved
Laura Smith – Spark on www.cnn.com writes, “Half of the 258,000 Somalis who died in the famine were children younger than 5.” (Smith-Spark et al. May 02, 2013) Somalia was once considered to be one of the most prosperous countries in Africa, but now is considered as one of the worse. How did this horrible transition occur to such a prosperous country? This horrendous result is due to the famine, lack of resources, and lack of trade. Oxfam International states, “Famines result from a combination “triple failure” ("Famine in Somalia: causes and solutions"). This triple failure includes production, access, and response failures. Somalia has been the victim of a two-year drought. Oxfam International states, “particularly in the expectation of the next harvest being 50% of normal.” ("Famine in Somalia: causes and solutions") Because Somalia cannot feed its people, this issue creates malnutrition and affects all ages, especially the young. This is a massive problem in their economic system. The young die too early, therefore creating a gap in the age distribution, which can affect Somalia’s work force in the future. This could also make the economic system weaker. If the only people living in Somalia are old, then there will not be any work done. One reason that they die so young is because of the lack of food. The availability of the food is minimal. Oxfam International states, “The drought has killed off the pastoralists’ prime livestock assets (up to 90% animal mortality in some areas), slashing further their purchasing power.” ("Famine in Somalia: causes and solutions") Somalia ‘s access to its food is limited because the people of Somalia cannot feed their animals. The people of Somalia also cannot trade for food, because dead...
The United States is one of the leading suppliers of Foreign Aid in the world, and even though the US gives billions, European countries give aid money to the same countries, this causes many areas of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia to be almost fully dependent on foreign aid. This means that without aid from other countries, they would not be able to support themselves at all. Foreign aid is meant to help countries that are struggling with civil unrest, disease, or natural disasters, it is not meant to help keep the country out of debt, but that is where more and more of the US and The EU’s foreign aid budget is going. The question is, does all this money actually go where it is intended? It should be going towards the government and to help the people, but in many cases, the countries government does not have the resources to properly track the flow of money. The countries in most cases have poor infrastructure and corrupt or oppressive leaders, not always at a national level, but in the towns and cities. So this means there is almost no way to oversee the flow of foreign aid through the country, all we can see is that their situations aren't getting any better and the countries are still impoverished. If this is the case, where are the millions of dollars going? Countries like Afghanistan and Iraq receive the most money from American foreign aid and European aid, yet they are still under oppressive governmental rule and there is still an extreme difference between the rich and poor. Garrett Harding’s theory of “Lifeboat Ethics” exemplifies how not giving aid to others will allow the strongest of society to thrive, while teaching the impoverished to help themselves. He believes that giving aid to poor countries will only make ...
...what the context, if that is besieged in some way, it feels unjust. It feels wrong’ (CNN, 2011). This raises an important question of where the limit is on how much information we should be allowed access to, when concerning public figures.
In the Africa, lies the country Somalia, which is located on east coast of the continent. Its capital, Mogadishu, however has inconveniently brought its own problems, from colonization to politics, disagreements arise, causing tension throughout the country. Somalia’s historical background and culture ultimately lead to the war in its capital, it lead to the War of Mogadishu.
The logic in this is that if the media does the right things freely and on its own, as a genuine service to the Filipino people, then the public will be its strongest ally in protecting the institution and its members. In their publication (2006), the Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ) and the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) declared that “the media’s best protection [against violence] is good, ethical journalism.” The same notion is believed by Mr. Canoy. According to him, ethical journalism is their greatest weapon as journalists, and that if they stay true to what their job asks of them, then, they have nothing to worry about (personal communication, July 25, 2013). The CMFR observes that a more civil media and a press orientation toward genuine public service might help to temper the resort to violence in Philippine society. The best way to attain a civil media is through the government promotion of ethical journalism. It was concluded by the CMFR study that the KBP should insist that all those going on the air for news and commentary should have passed accreditation as a minimum requirement (de Jesus & Khan, 2006). In addition to this, the government, through the NTC, must track down illegally-operating broadcast stations all over the country as what was done in Quezon City last July 8, in which the NTC, with the help of the Philippine National Police, was able to identify the location of the unauthorized frequency of 107.9 MHz (“NTC cracks down on illegal stations”,
In extreme situations, journalists choose the angle they can find, tick the boxes to the news worthiness, but never having a stand. According to Kempf, journalists fulfill certain criteria of newsworthiness and fake empirical evidence, which implements propaganda and in the journalists’ defense “that it did not matter the pictures were faked since they only showed what people already ‘knew’ and since they served the goal of opening the eyes of the public” (Kempf 2002, p. 60). Various examples from the War on Terror, where journalists and reporters would fake evidence just to gain more audiences but examples like this could elevate the issues, and it is as if this responsibility of Journalism of Attachment only adds fuel to the fire and this is done in the name of peace (Kempf 2002).
Magno, A., (2001) Human Rights in Times of Conflict: Humanitarian Intervention. Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, 2 (5). [online] Available from: http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/resources/publications/dialogue/2_05/articles/883.html> [Accessed 2 March 2011] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report (2000) Human Rights and Human Development (New York) p.19