Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of cameras regarding privacy invasion
Positive effects of surveillance cameras
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of cameras regarding privacy invasion
Surveillance Cameras
How are kids safe at night? Do they roam the streets without adult supervision? Are drug dealers taking over the streets? Are drivers nervous of everyone else’s bad driving habits? Although some believe law enforcement cameras invade privacy and disrupt everyday lives, cameras help keep citizens safe. “Police departments across Great Britain credit cameras with dramatic crime reduction, citing such impressive results as 75 percent drop in Airdrie, Scotland, a 68 percent reduction in Glasgow, Scotland, and a 57 percent drop in Northampton” (Taylor 44+). Without the use of cameras everywhere, there would be an excessive amount of accidents, killings, burglaries, drugs, and illegal acts. The use of law enforcement cameras help decrease drug trades, capture traffic violations, and protect neighborhoods without affecting the privacy of citizens.
Surveillance cameras today help police officers and other law enforcement agencies reduce drug trades. Drug dealers make trades in places where they feel comfortable with their surroundings and familiar with the people. By putting surveillance cameras in areas where drug trade appears the highest, cops obtain a greater chance of catching dealers. In their “familiar” areas, they know where to hide the drugs, who is not their friends, and where the police roam. Dealers try to find places where cameras are less common. However, in order to keep track of dealers, and eventually cut them off, cops place plenty of cameras anywhere and everywhere. “We’re not getting rid of anything, we’re moving it around” (Taylor 44+). The cameras force these drug dealers to move about and find new unfamiliar places. By moving these drug trades around, officers are now making more arrests tha...
... middle of paper ...
... Surveillance videos are used as teaching devices by helping kids and teenagers visualize life situations and the importance on why cameras help people. What people do not understand is that cameras and surveillance tapes are here for the purpose of helping and protecting all citizens.
Works Cited
Dale, Dennis. “Auto Asphyxiation.” The American Conservative 7.16 (25 August 2008): 22-23. Web. 31 Oct. 2011.
Perlman, Ellen. “The Valley of Surveillance.” Governing 20.10 (July 2007): 38-40, 42, 44-5. Web. 31 Oct. 2011.
“Recording Compliance Saves Costs.” Advanced Transportation Technology News July 2001: 8. General OneFile. Web. 20 Oct. 2011.
“Security Camera Use in Deterring Crime.” USA Today 125 (April 1997): 3-4. Web. 31 Oct. 2011.
Taylor, Brian J. “The Screening of America: crime, cops, and cameras.” Reason May 1997: 44+. General OneFile. Web. 19 Oct. 2011.
I feel body cameras will bring more awareness to police departments when it comes to the honesty in their staff’s action when they are unsupervised. They can be used as hard evidence in court rooms, to help make the correct judgment on the situations in question. A case of which Officer Michael Slager fell victim to when the courts later changed their verdict after being presented with a video of what really happened.
Have you ever heard of the idea of body-mounted cameras on police officers? If not, David Brooks will introduce you to the idea that was discussed in an article from New York Times called “The Lost Language of Privacy”. In this article, the author addressed both the positive and negative aspects of this topic but mostly concerned with privacy invasion for Americans. Although that is a valid concern but on a larger scale, he neglected to focus greatly on the significant benefits that we all desire.
A way to deal with this problem seems to be body cameras. According to Jay Stanley, writer of “Police Body-Mounted Cameras: With Right Policies in Place, a Win For All” states that body cameras are “small, pager-sized cameras that clip on to an officer 's uniform or are worn as a headset, and record audio and video of the officer 's interactions with the public.”. However, having these new cameras come with privacy and money issues. With 25% of all agencies in the nation already using them and 80% looking into them (pg. 1). So, the two main issues with body cameras have to be addressed before moving
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
Zetter, Kim. "World’s Top Surveillance Societies — Updated with Link." Editorial. Wired.com. Conde Nast Digital, 31 Dec. 2007. Web. 08 Feb. 2014.
Fine, Michelle, et al. "“Anything Can Happen With Police Around”: Urban Youth Evaluate Strategies Of Surveillance In Public Places." Journal Of Social Issues 59.1 (2003): 141-158. Academic Search Complete. Web. 26 Jan. 2016.
The intent of this study is to determine the effects between the independent variable of law enforcement professionals wearing body-cameras and the dependent variable of civilian’s willingness to talk to the police. The research questions that the data collected intends to answer are: Do civilians that come in contact with police deterred from talking to them about relevant information regarding a crime when there is a camera on the officer? What effects do police body-cameras have beyond accountability of law enforcement professionals? Will body-cameras damage communication between civilians and law enforcement that could result in a decrease in willingness to report crimes thus increasing crime itself?
Stevens, Dennis J. Media and Criminal Justice: the CSI effect. Sadbury: Jones and Bartlett, 2011. 35-38. Print.
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
Taylor, James Stacey. "In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance." Public Affairs Quarterly July 2005: 227-246.
"Smile, you're on Candid Camera." This was the catch phrase for the television show Candid Camera. The show filmed unsuspecting people in embarrassing and hilarious positions while their reactions are recorded on a hidden camera. Surveillance cameras are video cameras or close circuit TV (CCTV), which is used for the purpose of observing an area. There are several major concerns on school campuses. The two main concerns on school campuses are safety and security. With school violence on a steady rise, schools are force to resort to many safety and security measures including metal detectors, security guards, and surveillance cameras. Besides academics, protecting the students at school is a top priority to many parents, school administrators and teachers. Incidents of violence are gangs’ activities, drug deals, theft, assaults, and defacement of school property. These occurrences are taking place in some form in every school campuses. To aide in the defense of school violence, many schools are installing or adding video surveillance cameras. This leads to the topic question: Should Public Schools install Video Surveillance Cameras? Public Schools should install Video Surveillance Cameras. With over 14th years experience as a school teacher, I can attest to how video surveillance cameras have made a positive impact in school safety and security. With the passing of the School Safety Enhancements Act on 17 September 2008, $50 million was allocated to purchase video surveillance equipment for schools. Finley states “currently, more than 75% of all new schools in the United States are being equipped with video surveillance systems.” The intent of this research paper will illustrate the pros and cons of surveillance camer...
Whether it is walking down the street, driving on the highway, or shopping, there are usually one or more video cameras recording you. In most cities, there are cameras that record for safety purposes. On highways and busy roads, there are traffic cams that photograph cars also for safety purposes. In almost every store, video cameras are placed to prevent shoplifting. Even though daily we are being recorded, it is not always an invasion of privacy. The road cameras are only usually reviewed when there has been a traffic violation and if you did commit a violation, it is just for you to have been videotaped. The same case is true in store cameras and restaurants, if you are suspected of shoplifting it is the stores right to review the tapes. Cameras in cities or parking lots work to make people feel safe, so it is not an invasion of
Nieto, Marcus. "Public Video Surveillance: Is It An Effective Crime Prevention Tool?" California State Library. N.p., June 1997. Web. 10 Nov. 2013.
Kelly, Heather. "After Boston: The Pros and Cons of Surveillance Cameras." CNN. Cable News Network, 26 Apr. 2013. Web. 14 May 2014.
Since surveillance cameras have been invented for security reasons at shopping malls and stores they have also been place in public areas such as stoplights, parking lots, hallways, bus stops, and more.